Search
AI Powered
Human content,
AI powered search.
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Latest News
Don’t Miss Out
Join the
ComicSands.com
community and make your opinion matter.
More from

A bottle of vitamin pills next to a plant on a pink and white background
Photo by Afterave Essentials on Unsplash
Widely-Accepted 'Life Hacks' That Are Actually Terrible Advice
Dec 22, 2025
Everyone is eager to find a "life hack" that makes getting through their day a tad easier.
This could include making your lunch the night before so you're ready to go in the morning, or having your alarm clock out of arms reach, thus forcing you to get out of bed.
However, as with any advice, one should always be cautious before following it, as not all life hacks will make your life easier in the end.
Indeed, some life hacks will make your life even more difficult than you could possibly realize.
Redditor OneLameUser was curious to hear which life hacks people should avoid at all costs, leading them to ask:
"What widely accepted "life hack" is actually terrible advice?"
Stick To What's On The Shelf
"Most cleaning hacks are a good way to either light your house on fire, create accidental tear/mustard/other weaponized gases, give yourself chemical burns, ruin your floors/appliances/furniture etc, and at the very best just creates more work for you than there needs to be."
"I was a professional cleaner for years, most cleaning supplies do their jobs well without needing help from other cleaning supplies or intense scrubbing."
"Just follow directions on the bottle and you're golden lol."
"If you want to try out different products each cleaning to see which one you like best, go for it! "
"Just don't mix them."- Midnights24
Things Don't Just Magically Reappear
"Life hacks that involve exploiting resources intended for the common good."
"Like sure you don’t have to buy creamer for your coffee at home if you take it from your office, but the impression you make isn’t worth the savings."- Future_Armadillo6410
"Strength Lies In Nights Of Peaceful Slumbers"
"Just waking up early doesn't make you productive."
"It will make you worse if you genuinely need the rest."
"It's fine to get up if you have a good reason."
"But being forced or shamed into waking up early isn't the same thing."- ImportantQuestions10

Those Same People Also Don't Know How Finances Work Either...
"I've had people tell me not to get a raise, because in the end, you will lose out on money thanks to paying more taxes."
"People don't understand how taxes work."- Significant-Basket76
Not Everything Is "Multi-Purpose"
"You can use WD40 for hundreds of different things!"
"Nope, it's really bad for certain things: locks, bike chains, anything rubber or wood or painted."
"I was brought up believing it's a cure-all for most household, automotive problems when often it makes the problem worse."-PippyHooligan
Not Fighting Is Also An Option
"Most 'tricks' that involve self-defense are extremely dangerous if you use them in a real situation."
"If you're worried about that, just learn how to fight."- RickHard0

Ironically, These Could Have Toxic Consequences
"Anything that involves a 'detox'."
"Your liver and kidneys exist for that exclusive purpose."
"Drinking a shot of apple cider vinegar mixed with olive oil and maple syrup isn't going to miraculously cleanse your blood of impurities."- Flippy042
There's A Reason "Aging Gracefully" Is A Term
"Start Botox and filler young 'it’s preventative'."
"It actually ages you faster."
"You start using different muscles in the face to smile, etc, and so you will start getting wrinkles under your eyes or nose, which you wouldn’t have gotten until much later."
"Filler microscopically stretches the skin, it also doesn’t fully dissolve like they said it would, so it actually will migrate to different pockets in the face, leaving your face looking puffy and lumpy."
"Too many actives, and lasers will thin the skin, also making you appear much older."- GoalNext6124
... Is This Even A Thing?...
"Putting a spoon in your mouth while peeling an onion stops you from crying."
"Total hogwash."- Zip-Crane

It Takes Two
"Any sex advice about 'how to please your partner' that doesn't involve directly communicating with them."- BuggyWhipArmMF
Not If You Value Your Safety...
"Waiting until Black Friday to get a 'deal'."- -S3R070N1N-
Do What Makes You Happy
“'Hobby should make profit. Grind never stops'.”
"It should."
"You’re not a server, you’re a human."- SticksAndTheCity

A Hazardous Decision Indeed
"I've seen it said by a few younger people that one should turn their hazard lights on when driving on the highway because it makes them more visible."
"Don't do this."
"On top of no longer being able to use the turning signals, some cars will not turn on brake lights when the hazards are on."
"Which, on the highway, it's extremely dangerous."
"Plus, nobody else knows why the hazards are on, adding more chaos to highway driving."
"Just follow basic highway etiquette, you don't need to invent new rules of the road that only you are aware of."- 07ShadowGuard
A Little Contrition Goes A Long Way
"People at work will often tell you to never apologize."
"They say that it's bad for your brand."
"This advice is all over LinkedIn."
"They'll say things like 'instead of apologizing for being late with a deliverable, thank them for their patience'."
"This is borderline sociopathic advice, it's cruel, it's petty, and worst of all it doesn't work."
"If you've done something worth apologizing for, just apologize."- teabagalomaniac
Most Definitely Not A Hack...
"That entire genre of 'just follow your passion and the money will follow' career advice."
"It's not a hack; it's a financial sacrifice."
"Following your passion without any market research or skill development is just a fast track to being passionate, broke, and resentful of the thing you once loved."
"The real hack is often finding something you don't hate that pays well and then using the stability and money from that to fund your actual passion."- Late-Royale7316

A hack is meant to make things easier for you.
If even after the first try, a recommended hack doesn't seem to be doing that, it's safe to say it's not a good idea.
Even if some of us remain fascinated by how anyone could think having a spoon in your mouth will stop you from crying when peeling onions.
Keep ReadingShow less
Most Read
Woman Freaks Out After Getting Stuck In Entry Pod At Her 24-Hour Gym—And It's Pure Nightmare Fuel
Dec 19, 2025
This may not be the most innovative thought, but sometimes it's true that if it's not broken, you don't need to fix it.
That wasn't how the 24-hour gym company PureGym, which bought Blink Fitness in 2024, looked at it, however. They already had a security system in place for their customers to enter and exit the facilities during the off-hours when their staff members were not in the building, through which the customers would use a fob key system to scan in and out of the building.
Deciding to upgrade their system, PureGym implemented an app, in which a customer had to log in when they approached the building. They had to scan a barcode that appeared on their app, which would open a revolving-door-like pod. Once they stepped inside, that pod door would close, and they'd have to scan again to open the door on the other side of the pod, letting them into the facility. When it was time to leave, they had to do the same procedure.
The company justified this process as a way to maximize security and safety for their customers and prevent any non-gym members from entering when the staff were not available.
But for TikToker Gabby Kalomiris, the negatives far outweighed the positives.
At 10pm one evening after her workout, Kalomiris attempted to exit the gym when she got stuck in the pod. She managed to scan the code to enter the pod, but when she attempted to scan again to exit, the system did not respond.
She was trapped in the pod for approximately three minutes before a male gym member just happened to walk by. She was able to get his attention, and he was kind enough to scan the code in his membership app to open the pod so that she could exit.
She warned:
"Count your days, PureGym!"
You can watch the video here:
@gabbykalomiris PureGym aka blink fitness COUNT YOUR DAYS. seriously need a new gym this shit is really pissing me off 😤
Fellow TikTokers agreed that this was pure nightmare fuel, the idea of getting stuck in a pod putting shivers down their spines.






Others shared similar experiences to Kalomiris, stating that they either canceled their memberships or were seeking out a new gym after their location implemented the pod entry system.







It is undoubtedly stress-inducing to imagine going to the gym late at night to be able to exercise without a ton of people around you, only to get trapped in a pod and have no one there to help you get back out.
It was horrifying enough that Kalomiris, who claims to be claustrophobic, was in there for three minutes. And if the man hadn't walked by or had refused to help her, her experience could have been so much worse.
Rather than an important security measure, this pod system feels like an accident waiting to happen.
Keep ReadingShow less
Tech Worker Stunned After Not Getting Job Despite 11 Interviews—Only For Company To Use Their Code
Dec 19, 2025
It's no secret how atrocious the job market is right now, especially for certain industries. However, it might actually be much worse than we thought.
To cut costs, there are undoubtedly companies out there who require their applicants to complete free tasks before stealing their work and rejecting their application, effectively stealing their time and intellectual property.
With the new prevalence of AI and bot accounts, as well as scam accounts, it's hard to distinguish between quality jobs and listings that only want to steal our personal information and potentially train AI.
X-user @beaversteever may have just been the victim of one of these offenses, as they'd already completed 11 rounds of interviews, plus a free take-home project in which they'd created and supplied code to the company they hoped to work for.
Then they received the dreaded "We've gone in another direction" email, but this one had a few special twists.
Not only did the company admit to how many rounds of interviews they'd expected from their candidate, but they also admitted to being impressed with their work and utilizing their free labor without paying them or hiring them.
The rejection email read:
"Thank you for your interest in this role and for taking the time to complete [the] first phase of our interview processes that included 11 technical interview rounds, and the completion of the one-week take-home project."
"We were actually impressed with the quality of your submission, and your work has actually been accepted into our codebase."
The company's interesting choice of the use of the word "actually" was followed by the usual copy-paste rejection:
"This was an incredibly difficult decision, especially given your technical capabilities. However, after careful deliberation, we have decided not to move forward with your candidacy at this time."
"We truly appreciate your interest in [our company] and wish you the very best in your job search and future endeavors."
You can see the original email here:
Fellow X-users empathized with @beaversteever, but they also had their doubts about the quality of the company.
Typically, when a company rejects an applicant, the email will be incredibly vague, simply thanking them for their application and possibly their time dedicated to interviewing, before stating that they've gone in another direction.
The fact that this company specified that there had been 11 interviews was suspicious at best, and their confession that they were impressed with the X user's work and even implemented their work without paying them or hiring them feels like a lawsuit waiting to happen.
These mistakes were enough to give fellow X users pause and made them wonder if @beaversteever had fallen for a scam.


It's unclear if this was a legitimate company with terribly questionable practices or if the X user had fallen for some kind of scam that lost him time, money, and intellectual labor.
If it was a scam, he was fortunate not to have disclosed financial or other personal information that could have further implications down the line, but that doesn't make the lost time and effort feel any less disrespectful.
Keep ReadingShow less
The Oscars Are Moving To YouTube Starting In 2029—And Everyone Is Making The Same Joke
Dec 19, 2025
In 2029, viewers will be able to watch influencer vlogs, conspiracy explainers, AI slop, and the Oscars ceremony all in the same place. After more than half a century on broadcast television, the Academy Awards are officially moving to YouTube, where the ceremony will stream exclusively beginning with the 101st Oscars.
It’s a seismic shift for Hollywood’s biggest night. The Oscars were first broadcast on NBC in 1953, bounced between NBC and ABC throughout the 1960s and ’70s, and eventually settled into a long, uninterrupted run on ABC starting in 1976. That partnership will officially end with the 100th Oscars ceremony in 2028, closing out more than 50 years on network television.
In a joint statement announcing the partnership, Academy CEO Bill Kramer and Academy President Lynette Howell Taylor emphasized the global ambitions behind the move.
The statement reads:
“The Academy is an international organization, and this partnership will allow us to expand access to the work of the Academy to the largest worldwide audience possible, which will be beneficial for our Academy members and the film community.”
That global push comes as Oscars viewership has steadily declined over the past decade. Ratings have fallen from more than 40 million U.S. viewers in the late 1990s to roughly 18 million in recent years, including the 2022 and 2023 ceremonies, as audiences increasingly opt to watch viral clips and highlights online rather than sit through the full broadcast.
YouTube CEO Neal Mohan echoed the Academy’s optimism on the deal as both forward-looking and respectful of tradition.
Mohan said:
“This collaboration will inspire a new generation of creativity and film lovers while staying true to the Oscars’ storied legacy.”
The announcement itself was kind of straightforward. The internet’s reaction was not.
Almost immediately, social media locked onto one shared concern: ads. Specifically, YouTube ads. The same joke kept appearing, just phrased slightly differently. Would an unskippable ad interrupt Best Picture? Would the In Memoriam montage be followed by a mobile game promo? Would viewers have to wait five seconds to hear a winner thank their mom?
That timing, of course, begs the question: why announce the move 1,108 days in advance?
The anxiety wasn’t random. YouTube’s ad experience is famously aggressive, and viewers collectively seemed to share the same muscle memory of hovering over the “Skip Ad” button. The Oscars already struggle with pacing complaints on broadcast TV. The idea of algorithm-driven interruptions did little to reassure anyone.
Ironically, the Oscars are already deeply embedded in YouTube culture. Official clips like red carpet interviews, musical performances, and viral acceptance speeches like the Chris Rock-Will Smith slap down already circulate on the platform every year.
Viral moments from films like Avengers: Infinity War rack up millions of views long after the ceremony ends. For many viewers, YouTube has become the primary way they experience the Oscars or to be less bored on the metro.
In another Academy statement, the organization stressed just how expansive the partnership will be:
“This collaboration will leverage YouTube’s vast reach and infuse the Oscars and other Academy programming with innovative opportunities for engagement while honoring our legacy. We will be able to celebrate cinema, inspire new generations of filmmakers, and provide access to our film history on an unprecedented global scale.”
Social media quickly shifted to a more pressing concern: how often Timothée Chalamet might pause the ceremony in 2029 to remind viewers to like and subscribe, or what the ad breaks might look like.
Under the new deal, YouTube will hold exclusive global rights to the Oscars from 2029 through 2033. The ceremony will stream live on YouTube’s free app worldwide and on YouTube TV in the United States.
The agreement also includes a broader slate of programming, including a red carpet pre-show, behind-the-scenes content during the ceremony, the Oscars nominations announcement, the Governors Awards, and the Oscars Nominees Luncheon.
For YouTube, landing the Oscars is a significant win. The platform has poured resources into live programming as traditional TV audiences continue to shrink, and awards shows no longer dominate the cultural conversation the way they once did.
That shift has already pushed other ceremonies toward streaming. The Screen Actors Guild Awards moved from TNT to Netflix in 2024 as part of a multiyear deal, while the Academy of Country Music Awards left CBS for Amazon Prime Video in 2022.
As comScore senior media analyst Paul Dergarabedian told Axios:
“If you can’t draw an audience this year, I don’t know what else you got to do.”
And whether YouTube’s new deal will really reverse the Oscars’ ratings decline remains to be seen. But by 2029, Hollywood’s most prestigious night will be living alongside makeup tutorials, reaction videos, and comment sections primed to roast every acceptance speech in real time.
And if the ceremony does get interrupted by an ad, no one will be able to say they didn’t see the joke coming.
Keep ReadingShow less
JFK's Grandnephew Offers Blunt Reality Check After Kennedy Center Board Votes To Add Trump's Name
Dec 19, 2025
Former Massachusetts Democratic Representative Joseph Kennedy III made a very important point when he explained why the name of the Kennedy Center can't just be changed on a whim after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced that the Kennedy Center Board had voted to rename the performing arts center the "Trump-Kennedy Center."
Congress officially named the center after former President John F. Kennedy in 1964, following his assassination. According to Donald A. Ritchie, who served as Senate historian from 2009 to 2015, because Congress bestowed the name, only Congress has the authority to legally change it.
Ritchie noted that while Trump and others can casually refer to it by another name, such usage would carry no legal weight. Even so, the board chose not to wait for any formal resolution. It promptly updated its website branding to reflect the new title.
In a post on X, Leavitt announced:
"I have just been informed that the highly respected Board of the Kennedy Center, some of the most successful people from all parts of the world, have just voted unanimously to rename the Kennedy Center to the Trump-Kennedy Center, because of the unbelievable work President Trump has done over the last year in saving the building."
"Not only from the standpoint of its reconstruction, but also financially, and its reputation. Congratulations to President Donald J. Trump, and likewise, congratulations to President Kennedy, because this will be a truly great team long into the future! The building will no doubt attain new levels of success and grandeur."
You can see her post below.
In response to her post, Kennedy—the grandnephew of the late President Kennedy—wrote:
"The Kennedy Center is a living memorial to a fallen president and named for President Kennedy by federal law. It can no sooner be renamed than can someone rename the Lincoln Memorial, no matter what anyone says."
You can see his post below.
Jake Sherman, the head of Punchbowl News, also stressed this point:
"The building is statutorily named the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. Congress did not give the board the authority to change the name."
You can see his post below.
Many criticized Leavitt and the Trump administration and emphasized this fact themselves.
Other Kennedy family members have also spoken out against the change.
In a post on X, Kennedy’s niece, former television journalist Maria Shriver, said that "some things leave you speechless, and enraged, and in a state of disbelief. At times such as that, it’s better to be quiet. For how long, I can’t say."
Shriver also said "TDS is on full display," referring to the "Trump Derangement Syndrome" insult Trump uses to attack his critics, most recently the famed film director Rob Reiner, who was murdered earlier this week.
You can see her post below.
Shriver also called on Americans to reject the name change, drawing attention to Trump's obsession with himself and branding his name on everything, writing in part:
“It is beyond wild that he would think adding his name in front of President Kennedy’s name is acceptable. It is not. Next thing perhaps he will want to rename JFK Airport, rename the Lincoln Memorial, the Trump Lincoln Memorial. The Trump Jefferson Memorial. The Trump Smithsonian. The list goes on.”
“C’mon, my fellow Americans! Wake up! This is not dignified. This is not funny. This is way beneath the stature of the job."
"It’s downright weird. It’s obsessive in a weird way. Just when you think someone can’t stoop any lower, down they go…”
You can see her post below.
Additionally, Shriver’s brother, disability rights activist and film producer Timothy Shriver, said that board members who approved the change might not know that “the Kennedy Center is THE memorial to the president of the United States, John F. Kennedy,” and, like his sister, likened the change to renaming the Lincoln and Jefferson memorials.
Timothy Shriver called the move "an insult to a great president."
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More















