Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Latest News
Don’t Miss Out
More from
Melania Just Held A Bizarre Press Conference To Debunk 'False Smears' Related To Jeffrey Epstein—And Everyone Had The Same Response
First Lady Melania Trump had everyone thinking the same thing after she held a bizarre press conference on Thursday to deny that she had anything but casual ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the late disgraced financier, pedophile, sexual abuser, and sex trafficker.
Mrs. Trump publicly denied any ties to convicted sex offenders Epstein and his procurer Ghislaine Maxwell, saying claims linking her to Epstein are “lies” meant to damage her reputation. She said she met her husband, President Donald Trump at a New York City party in 1998 and did not meet Epstein until 2000, contradicting a witness statement in the Epstein files that alleges Epstein introduced the couple.
She insisted the allegations are false and said the individuals spreading them lack “ethical standards” and are attempting to defame her, though she did not specify who she was referring to. The reason for her remarks was unclear, and she has not been accused of wrongdoing in connection with Epstein or Maxwell.
In particular, she addressed a 2002 email to Maxwell that appears in the Epstein files, in which she praised a magazine story about Epstein and signed the message “love, Melania.” Maxwell’s reply referred to her as “sweet pea” and said she would try to call her.
The first lady said:
"The lies linking me with the disgraceful Jeffrey Epstein need to end today. The individuals lying about me are devoid of ethical standards, humility, and respect. I do not object to their ignorance, but rather, I reject their mean-spirited attempts to defame my reputation."
"I have never been friends with Epstein. Donald and I were invited to the same parties as Epstein from time to time, since overlapping in social circles is common in New York City and Palm Beach. To be clear, I never had a relationship with Epstein or his accomplice, Maxwell. My email reply to Maxwell cannot be categorized as anything more than casual correspondence."
"My polite reply to her email doesn’t amount to anything more than a trivial note. I am not Epstein’s victim. Epstein did not introduce me to Donald Trump. I met my husband, by chance, at a New York City party in 1998. This initial encounter with my husband is documented in detail in my book, 'MELANIA.' The first time I crossed paths with Epstein was in the year 2000, at an event Donald and I attended together."
"At the time, I had never met Epstein and had no knowledge of his criminal undertakings. Numerous fake images and statements about Epstein and me have been circulating on social media for years now. Be cautious about what you believe. These images and stories are completely false. I am not a witness or a named witness in connection with any of Epstein’s crimes."
"My name has never appeared in court documents, depositions, victim statements, or FBI interviews surrounding the Epstein matter. I have never had any knowledge of Epstein’s abuse of his victims. I was never involved in any capacity—I was not a participant, was never on Epstein’s plane, and never visited his private island. I have never been legally accused or convicted of a crime in connection with Epstein’s sex trafficking, abuse of minors, and other repulsive behavior."
"The false smears about me from mean-spirited and politically motivated individuals and entities looking to cause damage to my good name to gain financially and climb politically must stop. My attorneys and I have fought these unfounded and baseless lies with success and will continue to maintain my sound reputation without hesitation."
She continued:
"To date, several individuals and companies have been legally obligated to publicly apologize and retract their lies about me, such as 'The Daily Beast,' James Carville, and Harper Collins UK. Now is the time for Congress to act. Epstein was not alone. Several prominent male executives resigned from their powerful positions after this matter became widely politicized."
"Of course, this doesn’t amount to guilt, but we still must work openly and transparently to uncover the truth. I call on Congress to provide the women who have been victimized by Epstein with a public hearing specifically centered around the survivors. Give these victims their opportunity to testify under oath in front of Congress, with the power of sworn testimony."
"Each and every woman should have her day to tell her story in public, if she wishes, and then her testimony should be permanently entered into the Congressional Record. Then, and only then, will we have the truth."
You can hear what she said in the video below.
The general response: The first lady doth protest too much, and the fact she—who closely guards her public image—has spoken out means something must be coming out soon.
Afterward, senior adviser Marc Beckman said in a statement that the first lady decided to speak out now because “enough is enough” and “the lies must stop.”
The first lady's remarks came after the Justice Department informed the House Oversight Committee that former Attorney General Pam Bondi would not comply with a subpoena to testify before the panel next week.
Her statement also comes about six months after author Michael Wolff sued her, alleging she threatened a $1 billion lawsuit over comments he made linking her to Epstein.
Mrs. Trump's attorneys moved to dismiss the case in January, and a judge has not yet ruled. Wolff told NBC News he was “totally caught out of the blue” by her remarks and said he has no upcoming book or project that would explain why she addressed the issue now.
Most Read
Dem Rep. Sarah McBride Perfectly Shames Nancy Mace For Her Transphobic Response To McBride's Condemnation Of Trump
Delaware Democratic Representative Sarah McBride pushed back at South Carolina Republican Representative Nancy Mace after Mace responded with transphobia to McBride's criticism of President Donald Trump's genocidal threat to kill the "whole civilization" of Iran.
Trump has insisted that God supports his war on Iran and declared—before a provisional ceasefire was announced—that "a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again" ahead of a deadline to bomb Iran’s power plants and bridges that legal scholars and world leaders have said would constitute war crimes.
In response to this, McBride said:
"It doesn't matter if it's 'just bluster' or 'leverage.' The president doesn't get to threaten genocide as a negotiating tactic."
You can see her post below.
McBride's post caught the attention of Mace, who replied:
"You don't get to call yourself a woman but you still do it."
You can see her post below.
The attack was unsurprising coming from Mace, who has said transgender people are “mentally ill” and “should be in a straitjacket.” She has repeatedly attacked transgender people since 2024, garnering significant attention after proposing a resolution to bar McBride from using women’s facilities at the Capitol complex.
In Congress, she has scored just 14 and 15 out of 100 on the Human Rights Campaign’s Congressional Scorecard. She also voted against the Equality Act, which seeks to ban discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals, and opposed reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act because it included protections for transgender inmates.
McBride took Mace to task, reposting her words and saying:
“According to this person in my replies, trans people exist so Donald Trump gets to genocide a country.”
You can see her post below.
Many were disgusted by Mace's attack and joined McBride in calling her out.
Sadly, other prominent Republicans have wheeled out transphobic attacks to deflect from Trump's genocidal threats.
After Minnesota Governor Tim Walz said Trump "has lost his mind," former NCAA swimmer and current transphobic conservative darling Riley Gaines said that if Walz, "who required tampons in 4th grade boy's bathrooms thinks you've lost your mind, it's a pretty good sign you're completely sane."
Conservatives have dubbed Walz "Tampon Tim" following his approval of a 2023 bill that requires schools to provide free menstrual products in all public school bathrooms.
The Minnesota law, which took effect on January 1, 2024, mandates that menstrual products including pads, tampons, and other items “must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district.”
Gaines was swiftly shut down for comparing tampons to genocide simply because the law's chief sponsor said it was important to make menstrual products available to transgender students so they wouldn't have to ask for them.
JD Vance Dragged After Making Bizarre 'Skydiving' Analogy About His Wife To Explain Iran Ceasefire Deal
Vice President JD Vance had critics raising their eyebrows after he used a bizarre analogy about his wife–Second Lady Usha Vance—going skydiving while attempting to explain the United States' position on Iran's right to enrich uranium.
Vance addressed reporters on the tarmac at Budapest Ferenc Liszt International Airport as he left Hungary, where he had voiced the Trump administration’s support for Prime Minister Viktor Orbán only days before the country’s elections.
Vance was asked if he foresees "a scenario in which the administration may be willing to agree to allow Iran to continue enriching uranium for civilian nuclear purposes."
The question came after Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf accused the U.S. and Israel of already violating parts of a proposed ceasefire framework. Ghalibaf said three provisions of Iran’s 10-point plan for negotiations had been breached even before talks began, undermining the basis for the two-week ceasefire that was brokered with Pakistan’s help.
Ghalibaf cited several alleged violations, including continued fighting involving Lebanon, a reported drone intrusion into Iranian airspace, and disputes over Iran’s right to uranium enrichment under the proposed framework. Vance earlier confirmed President Donald Trump "said that we don’t want Iran enriching towards a nuclear weapon and we want Iran to give up the nuclear fuel."
Vance objected to one part of Ghalibaf’s statement—the claim that the U.S. was denying Iran’s “right to enrichment,” referenced in the sixth clause of the proposed framework.
To illustrate his point, he offered an oddball analogy:
“I thought to myself, you know what? My wife has the right to skydive, but she doesn’t jump out of an airplane because she and I have an agreement that she’s not going to do that because I don’t want my wife jumping out of an airplane."
"We don’t really concern ourselves with what they claim they have the right to do. We concern ourselves with what they actually do.”
You can hear what he said in the video below.
It was truly bizarre.
Does he know we can hear him?
Comedian Explains How Millennials' Midlife Crises Are Different From Past Generations—And He's Spot On
Don't make promises you cannot keep, unless your goal is to hurt someone.
Millennials know that practically better than anyone. They were fed a long and impassioned series of advice, hyper-focused on the importance of getting a college degree in order to find a good job. They were also force-fed traditionalist ideals of getting married, having kids, and buying a nice house with the money they'd be making from that great job, of course.
But for most Millennials, the proverbial rug was ripped out from under their feet and their futures disappeared in a blink of an eye, because somewhere between graduating high school and earning that college degree and racking up debt, the world around them changed, thanks to 9/11, economic crisis, a technological boom, a pandemic, and multiple wars.
Suddenly, there was a huge wave of people who couldn't find a job that covered their basic necessities—or couldn't find a job *period*—let alone one that allowed them to save up for that dream life they were promised if they just "worked hard."
Now, those Millennials are between their mid-thirties and mid-forties, facing the familiar midlife crisis that the generations before them addressed by changing their hair, their relationship, or their car. But these previous generations were stressed about the fact that their life was half over and that there was still so much more they wanted to do.
Some Millennials have pointed out:



Millennials are stuck looking back, feeling grief for what they were promised and did not receive, but also feeling nostalgia for the life they grew up with that they'll never be able to replicate, because it predates the digital age and the pandemic.
Comedian Mike Mancusi addressed this in a recent video on Instagram, stating that Millennials are going to have to face their midlife feelings just like anyone else, but they're going to have to approach it differently than buying a Lambourghini.
Mancusi challenged Millennials instead to pursue something that brings them happiness, and arguably, this must be something that they can do for themselves, with or without residual income resulting from it, because if they're doing it from a place of joy, then it's something that society cannot take away from them.
Mancusi explained:
"We were told the blueprint to follow. We all followed it. And here we are, unfulfilled."
"We look back and go, 'Wait a minute. I was told to do all these things, I did them, and still, I'm not happy.'"
"That is a way different crisis."
"You have to find something else to do."
"Whatever you want to call it, a hobby, a passion, but it has to be something that's for you."
You can watch the video here:
Fellow Millennials agreed with Mancusi, and some shared what they were already working on.











Millennials get blamed for a lot of things, like being lazy and eating too much avocado toast, but the generations before them would have little to say if they really pointed out how the world shifted beneath their feet as they grew up.
Now that they're a little older and can make decisions for themselves, it's best for them to focus on the things that will bring them joy, with or without money, and to really lean into the fact that even if they cannot depend on others, they can absolutely depend on themselves.
AI-Generated Word Search For Kids Goes Viral After Nobody Can Find A Single Word In It
Every Easter season, children look forward to scavenger hunts, Easter-specific candies, and baskets full of various goodies.
A favorite item in many premade Easter baskets is the activity book, which often features mazes, crossword puzzles, and of course, word searches.
But Redditor XcuseMeWat posted on the "Mildly Infuriating" subReddit after they went through an activity book, perfect for kids in the springtime, and came across a very problematic word search.
The word search page promised fun, Easter-themed and springtime-themed words, including "Easter," "Rabbit," "Jellybeans," and "Sunrise," but when the Redditor attempted to complete it, they could not find a single word.
That is, not without a little finagling. The word "faith," for example, can be found by looking in two vertical rows. The "aith" can be found vertically three rows from the left, with the "a" being six letters from the bottom. To find the "f" to complete the word "faith," though, the person searching has to look to the right of the "a," placing the word in an L-shape, which breaks the rules of all words being horizontal, vertical, diagonal, or backwards.
The Redditor posted a photo of the word search and shared their suspicions:
"I defy you to find a single word in this 'kids' word search."
"This has to be a joke, or it's AI-generated and not checked by a human. There's no way a person could mess up this badly, surely!"
You can explore the word search here:

Fellow Redditors went on a wild word hunt, having to laugh at the ridiculousness of it.
"Kuarrot. AI made, and published without any checks." - bumbumwhat
"This is crazy, because aren't there existing word search generators that actually produce a proper word search? Instead, they used AI with no solutions. Pathetic." - despaseeto
"I wrote a word search generator over 40 years ago. They're not that hard to do. I'm assuming that this is either a trolling attempt or that the list and grid got mismatched somehow." - Old-Chesire862
"They have existed for a long time. I used to use them 20 years ago. It was one of the easiest things to do as a teacher when you just needed to have an activity to keep kids busy."
"Throw all the kids' names on a word search. Put the vocabulary words on a word search. Book characters. Places. I had a bunch of printed out for them to do anytime they finished something early." - Open_Bug_4251
"It's crazy to get AI to spit out a crossword when there are literally websites to generate one that’s actually functional. I had to make over a decade ago for a class and used a website." - Cherry_Flavoured_
"This and AI-generated colouring books will be something our kids will be discussing together on Reddit, like, in thirty years." - Upset-Nose-4016
"Here's our future:"
"Remember impossible word searches? As kids, did anyone else's lazy teachers hand out word searches that didn't have the words on them? What gives?"
"In case you didn't know, dogs only have two ears! I never had pets as a child, so I didn't know this. My coloring books always had three-eared dogs."
"Did you know, in the mid-20s, generative text technology was used worldwide as a child-care tool?"
"In the early 2020s, there was a trend where millions of households used a text generating software to give advice on tasks, make lists, and even take care of their children! Doctors even prescribed it as a mental health aid! Just another fun example of people making wacky choices with new technology!" - BLAZMANIII
"My mam bought me an AI-generated colouring book (she didn't know) for stress, and it's a f**king mess of a thing. Lots of random arms and legs and other bits like that that make no sense. Some of the pages are actually really stressful to look at." - Natural_Task9025
"This word search thing I find especially egregious because it’s like we’re going through some mass psychosis. I remember simple word search creation tools that actually worked back like 20 years ago."
"There’s literally no reason to do this. It’s not easier. It’s not more accurate, and it doesn’t cost less. Yet here it is." - AllieRaccoon
"I was looking at this picture and was thinking, oh, the words were in there. Then I saw at the bottom it said there were 20 words, but the list only had 11."
"That's when I looked at the original again to notice the list of words was replaced. I have been laughing for like five minutes. Thank you! 10/10!" - Smiling_Guy
AI-generated products are not totally new, but this word search is a great example of how "new" and "fast" aren't always "better."
The sad thing is that there are people in the world who are very talented at making complex and enjoyable word searches and crossword puzzles, and there are also computer programs that are highly proficient, both of which might be displaced, inappropriately, by AI.















