Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

We Now Know How Much Donald Trump's Military Parade Will Really Cost and the Internet Is Not OK

We Now Know How Much Donald Trump's Military Parade Will Really Cost and the Internet Is Not OK
President Donald Trump at a rally in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Fiscal responsibility?

The planned military parade President Donald Trump wanted ever since seeing a special Bastille Day parade in Paris, France, in 2017, gives people a few important points to ponder. *see end of article for continuing updates to this story

The foremost issue for many remains the fact that among the most vocally opposed to the parade Trump claims would honor active duty military and veterans, are active duty military and veterans.


A February 2018 Army Times poll—seen below—of active duty military personnel showed 89 percent opposed to the parade. The poll asked: "Should there be a parade showcasing troops and military equipment in Washington, D.C.?"

Army Times online poll 2/7/2018 (screen grab)

Recent cuts to veterans services—deemed necessary by congressional Republicans and the Trump administration—provoked strong veteran opposition to the parade as well.

Veterans on social media suggested organizing a veterans march or counter protests in Washington DC on the day of the parade.

Now there is new information for the public to process regarding Trump's parade: the actual cost.

According to a Pentagon report, the unpopular Trump mandated U.S. version of a parade of military strength will feature up to 7,000 servicemembers, 100 vehicles, 50 aircraft and 100 horses. So what is the estimated price tag for Trump's Washington DC display set to rival the military parades of Russia's Vladimir Putin, China's Xi Jinping and North Korea's Kim Jong Un?

The Department of Defense and the interagency partners handling the civilian logistics updated their cost estimate for the parade from the original $12 million to a whopping:

$92,000,000.00

A lot goes in to staging any event. For the type of military display the President ordered the Pentagon to give him there are a multitude of logistical costs.

Logistics refers to the costs needed to transport, house and feed the active duty personnel being required to participate; the same for any non-human participants like horses and dogs; the transportation, fueling, maintenance and storage costs of any equipment to be used in the parade; and the costs of setting up, cleaning up and securing the venue for the parade.

Barricades and fencing as well as grandstands and viewing platforms will need to be set up and if not already in stock, purchased. Security personnel will need to be on hand to handle both spectators and any protesters. Everyone who works to set up, during the parade or after to tear down and clean up will need to be paid.

$92 million reflects an increase of $80 million over the original estimate which only accounted for a portion of the logistics required to mount the parade. If everything required for the parade already sat in Washington DC awaiting the go ahead, it might cost $12 million.

It costs another $80 million for the logistics of getting everything to that go point, then restore Washington DC to its pre-parade state afterward. The figure includes $50 million from the Department of Defense (DoD)—who needs to get their equipment and personnel to DC and back to their home bases—out of their fiscal year(FY) 2019 budget and $42 million from the interagency partners—likely including Homeland Security and the National Park Service—FY2019 budgets.

The President recently signed the FY2019 DoD budget appropriations, but the status of the other agencies' FY2019 funding could impact the parade slated for November 10, 2018. Any logistical costs for the parade must come from the fiscal year budget of the year of the event. October 1, 2018 is the beginning of federal fiscal year 2019.

Once news broke of the real cost associated with the parade—that it seems like only the President wants to see—people on Twitter expressed strong feelings about the use of that much money, as shown by the following tweets.

The veterans organization, Vote Vets, remains a strong opponent of the parade.

Many others expressed the same sentiment.

One must ask again, if those this parade contends to honor—active duty and military veterans—are among the most vocally opposed to it, why is it going forward?

If you plan a parade for someone and they do not want it, who or what is it really for?

Thursday evening, the Pentagon announced they agreed to postpone the parade.

"The Department of Defense and White House have been planning a parade to honor America's military veterans and commemorate the centennial of World War I," Defense Department spokesman Colonel Rob Manning said in a statement. "We originally targeted November 10, 2018 for this event but have now agreed to explore opportunities in 2019."

However Friday morning, President Donald Trump claimed he chose to cancel the parade, blaming Washington DC for the actual costs his administration gave him, but added "Maybe we will do something next year in D.C. when the cost comes WAY DOWN."

The Washington DC mayor's response can be read here. And Vote Vets is already getting ready to block any November 2019 parade plans.

More from People/donald-trump

TikToker @richi_luvv; Sabrina Carpenter
@richi_luvv/TikTok; Sabrina Carpenter/YouTube

Kidz Bop Just Released A Cover Of A Super Suggestive Sabrina Carpenter Song—And Fans Are Not OK

Kidz Bop, the long-running music outfit that refashions pop songs for the ears of children, usually focuses on upbeat, bubble gum pop tunes, right?

It's like the kind of songs you'd hear at, say, the grocery store, retooled for the elementary school set.

Keep ReadingShow less
screenshot from Fox News broadcast
Fox News

Sean Hannity Roasted After Claiming His Friends In NYC Are 'Scared' After Mamdani's Win

When Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani won the Democratic primary for New York City mayor in June, Republicans and some old school Democrats were positively apoplectic.

An immigrant Muslim of Gujarati and Punjabi Indian parents who has lived in NYC since he was 7 years old, the 34-year-old New York State Assembly member was the stuff of nightmares for the MAGAsphere. Mamdani was a non-White, non-Christian, Uganda-born immigrant and progressive Democrat.

Keep ReadingShow less
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez; Zohran Mamdani
Andres Kudacki/Getty Images; Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

AOC Has Democrats Applauding With Her Viral Reaction To Zohran Mamdani's Historic Win

New York Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez had people nodding their heads after she opened up about why democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani's win in the New York City mayoral election on Tuesday is so important for the country at large as well as for the future of the Democratic Party.

Mamdani successfully took on the establishment to become the first South Asian, first Muslim, and first millennial mayor-elect, running a campaign that focused predominantly on the city's affordability crisis and that successfully batted away racist and Islamophobic backlash from right-wingers who claimed his policies would "destroy" the city.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Mike Johnson
Fox News

Mike Johnson Gets A Swift Reality Check After Trying To Downplay The Election Results

House Speaker Mike Johnson was called out after displaying his clear denial over Tuesday night's election wins for Democrats, claiming that "no one should read too much into" the results despite major upsets.

Democrats won races around the country, particularly in Virginia, where Abigail Spanberger became the first woman to the win the governorship in the state's history, and in New York City, where Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, successfully took on the establishment to become the first South Asian, first Muslim, and first millennial mayor-elect.

Keep ReadingShow less
A man in a suit walking down the sidewalk and pulling a bag
person in black suit jacket with r ed bag walking beside metal fence
Photo by Romain V on Unsplash

People Who Quit Their Jobs On Day One Reveal What Made Them Say 'Nope, Not Doing This'

Every now and then, simply because we need money, we might take a job that doesn't fulfill us in any way, but at least keeps our bank accounts happy.

Some jobs, however, are so soul-sucking that even with no other prospects immediately on the horizon, we can't, in good conscience, keep working them.

Keep ReadingShow less