Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

We Now Know How Much Donald Trump's Military Parade Will Really Cost and the Internet Is Not OK

We Now Know How Much Donald Trump's Military Parade Will Really Cost and the Internet Is Not OK
President Donald Trump at a rally in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Fiscal responsibility?

The planned military parade President Donald Trump wanted ever since seeing a special Bastille Day parade in Paris, France, in 2017, gives people a few important points to ponder. *see end of article for continuing updates to this story

The foremost issue for many remains the fact that among the most vocally opposed to the parade Trump claims would honor active duty military and veterans, are active duty military and veterans.


A February 2018 Army Times poll—seen below—of active duty military personnel showed 89 percent opposed to the parade. The poll asked: "Should there be a parade showcasing troops and military equipment in Washington, D.C.?"

Army Times online poll 2/7/2018 (screen grab)

Recent cuts to veterans services—deemed necessary by congressional Republicans and the Trump administration—provoked strong veteran opposition to the parade as well.

Veterans on social media suggested organizing a veterans march or counter protests in Washington DC on the day of the parade.

Now there is new information for the public to process regarding Trump's parade: the actual cost.

According to a Pentagon report, the unpopular Trump mandated U.S. version of a parade of military strength will feature up to 7,000 servicemembers, 100 vehicles, 50 aircraft and 100 horses. So what is the estimated price tag for Trump's Washington DC display set to rival the military parades of Russia's Vladimir Putin, China's Xi Jinping and North Korea's Kim Jong Un?

The Department of Defense and the interagency partners handling the civilian logistics updated their cost estimate for the parade from the original $12 million to a whopping:

$92,000,000.00

A lot goes in to staging any event. For the type of military display the President ordered the Pentagon to give him there are a multitude of logistical costs.

Logistics refers to the costs needed to transport, house and feed the active duty personnel being required to participate; the same for any non-human participants like horses and dogs; the transportation, fueling, maintenance and storage costs of any equipment to be used in the parade; and the costs of setting up, cleaning up and securing the venue for the parade.

Barricades and fencing as well as grandstands and viewing platforms will need to be set up and if not already in stock, purchased. Security personnel will need to be on hand to handle both spectators and any protesters. Everyone who works to set up, during the parade or after to tear down and clean up will need to be paid.

$92 million reflects an increase of $80 million over the original estimate which only accounted for a portion of the logistics required to mount the parade. If everything required for the parade already sat in Washington DC awaiting the go ahead, it might cost $12 million.

It costs another $80 million for the logistics of getting everything to that go point, then restore Washington DC to its pre-parade state afterward. The figure includes $50 million from the Department of Defense (DoD)—who needs to get their equipment and personnel to DC and back to their home bases—out of their fiscal year(FY) 2019 budget and $42 million from the interagency partners—likely including Homeland Security and the National Park Service—FY2019 budgets.

The President recently signed the FY2019 DoD budget appropriations, but the status of the other agencies' FY2019 funding could impact the parade slated for November 10, 2018. Any logistical costs for the parade must come from the fiscal year budget of the year of the event. October 1, 2018 is the beginning of federal fiscal year 2019.

Once news broke of the real cost associated with the parade—that it seems like only the President wants to see—people on Twitter expressed strong feelings about the use of that much money, as shown by the following tweets.

The veterans organization, Vote Vets, remains a strong opponent of the parade.

Many others expressed the same sentiment.

One must ask again, if those this parade contends to honor—active duty and military veterans—are among the most vocally opposed to it, why is it going forward?

If you plan a parade for someone and they do not want it, who or what is it really for?

Thursday evening, the Pentagon announced they agreed to postpone the parade.

"The Department of Defense and White House have been planning a parade to honor America's military veterans and commemorate the centennial of World War I," Defense Department spokesman Colonel Rob Manning said in a statement. "We originally targeted November 10, 2018 for this event but have now agreed to explore opportunities in 2019."

However Friday morning, President Donald Trump claimed he chose to cancel the parade, blaming Washington DC for the actual costs his administration gave him, but added "Maybe we will do something next year in D.C. when the cost comes WAY DOWN."

The Washington DC mayor's response can be read here. And Vote Vets is already getting ready to block any November 2019 parade plans.

More from People/donald-trump

Screenshots of LA parking officer issuing parking ticket
@Osint613/X

Video Of LA Police Officer Still Giving Out Parking Tickets Despite Wildfires Divides Social Media

Thousands of Los Angeles County residents have been forced to evacuate to avoid toxic air inhalation and the encroaching wildfires that have destroyed more than a thousand homes and businesses across the region.

So far, five people have lost their lives. Two of the largest active fires, the Pacific Palisades and the Eaton fires, remain designated 0% containment zones as firefighters continue efforts to extinguish raging flames.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Jasmine Crockett and Scott Jennings
CNN

Dem Rep. Blasts CNN Pundit For Griping About 'DEI' Firefighters Amid LA Wildfires

During a CNN appearance on Newsnight with Abby Phillip, Texas Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett laid into conservative pundit Scott Jennings for insinuating that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives to diversify California fire departments are partially to blame for the Los Angeles wildfires.

Deadly wildfires in Los Angeles County remain largely uncontained, with officials reporting at least five confirmed fatalities so far. However, on Thursday, authorities admitted, “frankly, we don’t know” the true extent of the death toll. Evacuation orders are currently affecting nearly 180,000 residents, as thousands of homes and buildings have been destroyed.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Jesse Watters
Fox News

Jesse Watters Admits The Real Reason He Supports Trump's Proposal To Annex Canada

Fox News personality Jesse Watters was criticized after exclaiming on The Five that the reason why he supports President-elect Donald Trump's proposal to annex Canada is precisely because Canadians don't want this to happen at all.

Watters' remarks are the latest development since Trump made headlines for jabbing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau with remarks about Canadian statehood.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eric Swalwell; Donald Trump
John Lamparski/Getty Images; Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Dem Rep. Hilariously Trolls Trump For Fixation On Canada And Greenland Instead Of Lowering Costs

California Democratic Representative Eric Swalwell had social media users cackling after he trolled President-elect Donald Trump over his threats to take over Canada and Greenland rather than lowering grocery prices as he promised during the campaign.

Swalwell is the latest politician to respond to Trump over the matter since he made headlines for jabbing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau with remarks about Canadian statehood and calling "the ownership and control of Greenland" an "absolute necessity."

Keep ReadingShow less
Man in a tux wearing fancy watch
Charbel Aoun/Unsplash

People Recall The Most Out Of Touch Thing They've Heard Anyone Say

Getting everyone's point of view can be fascinating whenever you're with a group of people engaged in a discussion on a range of topics. However, the occasion can be eye-opening when someone unable to read the room makes a comment that can be interpreted as wildly inappropriate.

In an age where social norms are always challenging the way we engage in discourse, nothing is surprising... except for that one rare instance.

Keep ReadingShow less