Folks, did you know ESPN airs New Yearâs Eve coverage without basketball or football? Many people (including yours truly) didnât eitherâuntil a clip of ESPN host Scott Van Pelt reacting to a live shot of two men kissing at midnight went viral for being awkward, side-eye worthy, and unintentionally hilarious.
Van Pelt, who has hosted ESPNâs midnight New Yearâs Eve edition since 2015, was doing exactly what the gig requires: filling time, tossing out commentary, and steering viewers through confetti-filled live shots of strangers kissing on cue. Itâs standard New Yearâs Eve television fareâusually not on SportsCenter.
As the clock struck midnight and the cameras panned across couples in New York City, Van Pelt reacted casually to a heterosexual couple making out on screen.
He joked:
âYeah⊠live makeouts on Sports Center. Get into it!â
And oh my, did they get into itâuntil the camera landed on two men kissing and the moment briefly went out of bounds. Van Pelt audibly froze, like a small-town deer in headlights, stumbling over his words as if the teleprompter had suddenly betrayed him. Arms raised, brain buffering, he muttered through the moment before attempting a reset.
He blurted out:
"Ohhhhhhhh! What are we ⊠What do we got âŠ. We got love in the air!"
To be clear, he wasnât wrong. It was love in the air. But the delivery difference was impossible to miss. Where the straight couple got a breezy joke, the same-sex couple got a verbal rainbow-colored loading wheelâcomplete with hesitation, stuttering, and visible confusion.
He tried to rally, ending the moment with raised hands and a soft Hail Mary:
âWhoâs having a good time? Happy New Year, everybody!â
The clip, posted on Instagram by @tara_rule_, took off almost immediately.
You can watch the moment here:
From there, the internet did what it does best: weigh in.
The video racked up millions of views, with commenters split between âhe panicked, it happensâ and âthat reaction said more than he meant to say.â
Some accused Van Pelt of being visibly uncomfortable or even repulsed. Others gave him the benefit of the doubt, arguing he caught himself mid-thoughtâsuddenly aware he was live on national television and scrambling to course-correct.
Hereâs the thing: this doesnât read as overt homophobia so much as a man being caught wildly unprepared. Live TV is unforgiving, and unexpected moments tend to expose instinct before polish kicks in. Van Pelt didnât say anything offensive. He didnât cut away. He didnât condemn what he saw. He just⊠short-circuited. And yes, it was weird to watchâeven after the fact.
Still, itâs fair to point out that his reaction to the same-sex kiss was noticeably different from his reaction to the straight one. That contrast is exactly why the clip went viral. Even when intentions are neutral, reactions will always tell a story.
What makes this moment sticky is how same-sex affection can still register as âsurprisingâ in spaces where heterosexual affection barely gets a second thoughtâin kiss cams, commercials, entertainment, and everyday life.
The five-second Van Pelt pause is the point, and the internet wasted no time weighing in:
Behind the viral moment were two real people. The couple shown kissing at midnight were Ricky, a New York City-based physical therapist and personal trainer, and his boyfriend, DJ Petrosino, an interior designer.
As the debate continued online, Ricky offered a clear-eyed read of the moment and the reactions that followed to OutSports:
âSome people are like, âOh my gosh, heâs disgusted!â And others are like, âHeâs aroused!â Our interpretation was just that he was surprised and didnât want to say the wrong thing.â
The two, who have been dating for just over a year, made a last-minute decision to head to Times Square on New Yearâs Eve and were approached by a production assistant who asked if they would be willing to kiss at midnight.
They assumed it would be a background moment, maybe flashed briefly on a Jumbotron. They did not expect it to air live on national televisionâor to spark a viral debate by morning.
As DJ later explained, the kiss itself felt entirely unremarkable:
âWe thought it would just be shown on the Jumbotrons. We didnât know it was going to be televised. We kiss all the time, so we didnât think it was that big of a deal.â
By the time they reached a nearby bar, the moment was already replaying on TV. By the next morning, the memes had taken off, with reactions ranging from affectionate to conspiratorial to outright bad-faith outrage.
So, love was most definitely in the air at the start of 2026. It's the reaction that weirdly lagged behind the moment.








@sterlingkbrown/Instagram






reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
r/Fauxmoi/Reddit
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
r/Fauxmoi/Reddit
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
r/Fauxmoi/Reddit
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
r/Fauxmoi/Reddit
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
r/Fauxmoi/Reddit
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
r/Fauxmoi/Reddit
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
reply to @thinktwiceshow/Instagram
MS Now
@realDonaldTrump/Truth Social