Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

British People Explain How They Were Taught About The American Revolution In School

British People Explain How They Were Taught About The American Revolution In School

"British people of Reddit, how is the American Revolution taught in your schools?"–– This was today's burning question from Redditor Shamr0ck01, who did not, contrary to what you may believe, open a terrible can of worms and kick off an imperialist chest-puffing contest.


It turns out the British view the United States' decision to break away from its once mighty empire with much more grace than can be expected. There are no hard feelings here! Why would there be? It's not like it's being taught!

"I'm 34..."

Giphy

They don't teach it. I'm 34 and didn't learn about it at school. Learned about the Roman Empire, Egypt, World Wars I and II and about the British Empire. Mainly Africa and Australia. They mention the war of independence but that's about the extent of it.

tricks_23

"We did lots..."

Nothing. We did lots of Roman/ Anglo-Saxon/ Viking / Norman stuff then straight to the world wars. I think as someone else has said it's learning about things near your school that you can get to on a school trip.

somesnazzyname

"I only ever learned..."

Giphy

I only ever learned about it to add context to the french revolution in sixth form. it actually came up in our a-levels and no one could answer the question because we had no idea what happened.

EmilyHill616

"It's not..."

It's not part of the national curriculum. IIRC we had a small mention of it in the context of discussing the cotton trade, but that was about it.

reverseswang

"History I learnt..."

History I learnt (as far as I can remember):

The tudors
The great fire of London
The second world war
The first world war
Queen Victoria
British Civil War
Holocaust (separate to WW2, we did WW2 in primary and holocaust in Y9 or so)
Guy Fawkes

History of medicine for GCSE.

CSL456123

"On average..."

Giphy

On average a country celebrates independence from the UK every 7 days. We only go to school for 12yrs, and we've got Maths and other stuff to do.

Kapplar

"To Americans..."

To Americans the War of Independence was obviously a huge conflict that lead to the founding of a nation. To British - we have so much other military history (mainly Roman invasion, Norman conquest, 100 year war, War of the Roses, Spanish Armada, English Civil War, Battle of Trafalgar/Waterloo, WW1, WW2 to name a few) that it barely gets a mention.

We also cover non-military history (e.g. Kings/Queens of England, life during medieval period, Henry VIII founding the Church of England, Slavery, British Empire, Industrial Revolution) and learn a little about Ancient History (Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Celts)

There's a lot to squeeze in that is arguably more relevant to UK's development as a nation so we don't really cover it.

CharlieBxox

"It isn't..."

It isn't really.

While it might be America's first war as a nation, I don't think it even makes the top 10 of the most interesting wars that Britain has been involved in.

ShockRampage

"The fact that the USA won..."

Giphy

Although to the Americans, the Revolution is extremely important and the founding of their nation, in British history it's just a footnote. The war itself was just seen as a part of the larger war with France. France backed the fledgling USA, trying to distract Britain from the war in Europe. Britain had to invest more heavily in North America than the French did, so it was a worthwhile distraction. The fact that the USA won was a bit of a surprise, to both the French and the British.

KnowanUknow

"Other than the Civil War..."

Reading some of the comments on here, I think people need to understand that Britain has history going back millennia, while America has history that goes back a few hundred years.

Other than the Civil War and American Revolution, there hasn't really been anything else in American history that is comparable to the hundreds of wars/battles in British history; whether internationally or domestic. So, for America, these two events are massive, while they pale into insignificance in the U.K.

Even WW2 had a lot more happening in the U.K. than in the US, who joined the effort later. America didn't experience the blitz, the rationing or the evacuation of children from urban areas, for example. Nor did America have to rebuild cities and infrastructure, or deal with a whole generation of men wiped out or damaged by the war on the same scale as the UK. Other than troops deploying to Europe, life mostly continued as normal in America.

cavejack

More from People

Elmo; New York Knicks
Paul Zimmerman/WireImage; Gregory Shamus/Getty Images

Elmo Hit With Hilarious Backlash From New Yorkers After Tweeting Well-Wishes To Both The Knicks And The Spurs

Sesame Street may be set on a fictional street in a Manhattan neighborhood, but only a select few characters have that New York attitude.

Lovable, cuddly little Elmo is definitely not one of them, and it recently got him in a bit of trouble with fans of the New York Knicks.

Keep Reading Show less
Donald Trump
Samuel Corum/Getty Images

Trump Plans To Attend The NBA Finals In New York—And Knicks Fans Are Having None Of It

The New York Knicks lead the NBA finals best of seven series against the San Antonio Spurs 2-0 going into game three at Madison Square Garden (MSG) in New York City on Monday night.

It will be the first finals game played at the historic venue in 27 years. Should the Knicks prevail in the series, it will be the team's first championship since 1973.

Keep Reading Show less
Screenshot of Hillary Clinton in 2016; Donald Trump
C-SPAN; Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

Hillary Clinton's 2016 Speech Predicting How Trump Would Behave As President Just Resurfaced—And Wow

People can't help but nod their heads after one of former Secretary of State and then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's speeches from 2016 warning about how Donald Trump would act if elected president resurfaced and proved more relevant than ever.

The footage resurfaced as public sentiment has soured on the economy; recent surveys show that roughly two-thirds of Americans disapprove of Trump's economic stewardship, while a majority say their personal financial situation is deteriorating.

Keep Reading Show less
Screenshot of James Talarico; Donald Trump; Ken Paxton
@jamestalarico/X; Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images; Ron Jenkins/Getty Images

James Talarico Epically Blasts Trump And Senate Opponent Over What It Means To Be A 'Real Man'

Texas Senate candidate James Talarico criticized his opponent in November's election, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, as well as President Donald Trump in a speech about what it means to be a "real man" after facing regular attacks on his masculinity.

Trump has described Talarico as “a weird—a weird—candidate,” a line that was quickly incorporated into an advertisement from Paxton, who argued that that Talarico is unfit to represent Texans partly because of his supposed veganism. Members of the right-wing have followed suit and described Talarico as an “effeminate, estrogenetic, catty, and totally embarrassing” candidate.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Aniston (right) and Lisa Kudrow (left) discuss a potential Friends spinoff.
Variety/YouTub

Jennifer Aniston And Lisa Kudrow's Idea For A 'Friends' Spinoff Is Going Viral For All The Wrong Reasons

For decades, critics have argued that Friends benefited from a television landscape that often overlooked Black-led sitcoms telling similar stories. So when Jennifer Aniston and Lisa Kudrow recently floated the idea of a Friends spinoff called Girlfriends, many viewers saw it as yet another example of Black television history being left out of the conversation.

During Variety's Actors on Actors, Aniston and Kudrow discussed what a potential Friends revival could look like more than 20 years after the sitcom ended its original run.

Keep Reading Show less