Search
AI Powered
Human content,
AI powered search.
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Latest News
Don’t Miss Out
Join the
ComicSands.com
community and make your opinion matter.
More from
Joe Jonas Hilariously Chimes In After Couple's Argument About Him Goes Viral On TikTok
May 02, 2025
Joe Jonas is out here making sure that people in love stay in love—including preserving other people’s marriages.
The singer, whose upcoming album is called Music for People who Believe in Love, intervened in the comments section of a video of a married couple fighting over, of all things, whether there was a clause in their marriage about Joe Jonas.
The Jonas Brothers singer became the center of a relationship spat on TikTok after a fan jokingly told her husband, “I love Joe Jonas.”
In the viral clip, the husband replied, “You’re my wife. We are married... ‘til death do us part!”
Not missing a beat, she added an important caveat to those vows: “Unless Joe walks through that door.”
@mr.worldwide305pitbull #fyp #joejonas #jonasbrothers #joe @joejonas ur new song slaps
Her husband doubled down, “Joe Jonas, who's like five foot three? I’ll fight his a**. That’s a promise.”
The clip went viral due first to the sentiments expressed by both parties, which many people found relatable.
Enter Jonas himself. Not one to let love go down without a laugh, he jumped into the comment section:
“Well, I love you both and I’m 5’4 ok.”
Case closed. (FYI: IMDb lists him at 5′ 8″, but we’ll let Jonas himself say what he wants to for the sake of comedy—and marriage.)
People thought him adding his comment was truly the icing on the cake in the argument.
@shell.ey14/TikTok
@illsayitagainandagain/TikTok
Many folks said that if her husband loved her, he wouldn’t get in the way of her nuptial bliss with Joe Jonas.
@goldstarfragrancesnyc/TikTok
He should have known what kind of promise he was making in marrying her.
@asmiles/TikTok
@samilee925/TikTok
@reirupsamam/TikTok
Folks shared stories about fantasy husbands getting in the way of real relationships.
@kellyfarr3/TikTok
@globetwatter/TikTok
Some husbands-to-be were understanding.
@rainfoxx12/TikTok
@paula_tgw/TikTok
@realdogmombk/TikTok
Presumably the couple are reviewing the specifics of their vows, with Jonas aware of the situation.
Keep ReadingShow less
Most Read
Don’t Miss Out
Stay ahead of the curve with the latest news and viral moments from Comic Sands!
State Dept. Spokesperson Learns In Real Time That Marco Rubio Is Now National Security Advisor In Bonkers Video
May 02, 2025
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce was left reeling when she learned in real time that Secretary of State Marco Rubio would be the new acting national security advisor after Michael Waltz stepped down and was named U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations.
Waltz was recently at the center of what became known as "Signalgate" after he invitedAtlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg into a Signal chat with high-level Trump administration officials, particularly Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, in which they discussed military strategy surrounding war strikes in Yemen.
Yesterday, weeks after the scandal first broke, President Donald Trump dismissed Waltz as his national security adviser and tapped him instead to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations while replacing him in the position with Rubio. Waltz’s deputy, Alex Wong is also expected to be ousted.
The decision to remove him came so suddenly that many White House staffers only learned of it Thursday morning as senior officials began circulating word internally. And Bruce could not hide her own surprise when she was asked to respond to the news that her own boss would be pulling Waltz's weight in the interim.
RELATED: Tim Walz Goes Viral For Hilariously Shady Reaction To Mike Waltz's White House Ouster
Openly flustered after being asked about the move by a reporter, she proceeded to ramble:
"It is clear I just heard this from you. ... I have some insights into the potential of certain things that might happen. ... I think it's clear to all of you that you don't want to be ahead of your skis or drawing conclusions or speculating about what may occur. You can have a general sense of what's possible and then you see that manifest, usually."
"I think certainly one thing that I've learned is that things don't happen until the president says they're going to happen so the fact that—this was obviously Truth Social—that is the miracle of modern technology so that is an exciting moment here."
"As I know, Secretary Rubio, this is a man who you all know has worn many hats from Day 1 at managing the nature of things at the State Department, at USAID, and he is someone who is well known by the president. The president makes perfect assessments about who would implement his agenda and in this case he's chosen certainly the secretary and Mr. Waltz to implement his agenda moving forward."
"Not entirely surprising, I have to say, and good news for the American people."
You can watch what happened in the video below.
As many pointed out, the moment showcased just how dysfunctional the Trump administration really is.
Rubio now holds an unusually expansive portfolio, simultaneously serving as Secretary of State and national security adviser—something not seen since Henry Kissinger held both roles during the Nixon and Ford administrations.
In addition, Rubio is acting head of both the hollowed-out U.S.A.I.D. and the National Archives. The precedent isn’t a reassuring one: most historians view Kissinger’s dual role as problematic, given that the national security adviser is meant to mediate between the State Department, the Pentagon, and intelligence agencies.
Kissinger was eventually removed from the national security adviser post and replaced by Brent Scowcroft.
Keep ReadingShow less
Tim Walz Goes Viral For Hilariously Shady Reaction To Mike Waltz's White House Ouster
May 02, 2025
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz went viral for mocking now-former National Security Advisor Mike Waltz after the Trump administration announced he'd be leaving his position weeks after he was implicated in the Signal group chat scandal.
Waltz found himself at the center of what became known as "Signalgate" after he invitedAtlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg into a Signal chat with high-level Trump administration officials, particularly Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, discussing military strategy surrounding war strikes in Yemen.
Yesterday, weeks after the scandal first broke, President Donald Trump dismissed Waltz and tapped him to serve as ambassador to the United Nations instead—a notable reshuffling of senior White House staff and the first major personnel change Trump had hoped to sidestep during his second term. Waltz’s deputy, Alex Wong is also expected to be ousted.
Waltz held onto his position at the time largely because, according to aides, Trump was reluctant to appear as though he was caving to media pressure by letting him go.
And in came Walz with this simple quip:
"Mike Waltz has left the chat."
You can see his post below.
It was hilariously accurate.
Waltz was never seen as a strong ideological match for Trump or much of his inner circle, and while talk of his replacement had circulated quietly for weeks, those discussions escalated following the leak of the Signal chat.
Though he was originally scheduled to accompany the president to Michigan for his 100th day in office, Waltz stayed behind to manage a foreign policy issue, according to someone familiar with the situation.
The decision to remove him came so suddenly—as we've come to expect from the current administration—that many White House staffers only learned of it Thursday morning as senior officials began circulating word internally. By midmorning, aides were told the news was accurate and to await an official announcement from the president.
Keep ReadingShow less
Viral Tweet Claiming That 100 Unarmed Men Could Beat A Single Gorilla Sparks Heated Debate
May 02, 2025
In the early morning hours of Friday, April 25, X user DreamChasnMike posited the outcome of a showdown between Homo sapiens sapiens and one of our closest relatives.
Or rather 100 men versus one of our fellow primates.
His premise?
"i think 100 [men] could beat 1 gorilla everybody just gotta be dedicated to the sh*t"
@DreamChasnMike/X
The post went viral with over 290 million views as of the following Friday.
Soon others were weighing in and employing AI to find an answer to this question for the ages. Some people put a lot of work into their answers.
People—men, it's mostly men—seem downright obsessed.
Is this like another Roman Empire thing?
How long have men been thinking about ganging up on a gorilla‽‽
Lots of people had thoughts on the issue.
"can 100 men take a gorilla?" take him where? back to the jungle i hope
— Memento (Lasagna) Morty 🌙 (@mementomorty.bsky.social) May 1, 2025 at 12:05 AM
the 100 men should first identify the 10 weakest men; the other 90 should then attack the gorilla with stabbing weapons fashioned from their bones
— shaun (@shaunvids.bsky.social) April 30, 2025 at 10:24 PM
While the human vs. gorilla fight night post went viral this week, the question has been banging around the internet for almost a decade.
It routinely gets posted in the Who Would Win subReddit, including the entry here from five years ago.
As well as popping up on Quora more than once, with entries going back at least eight years.
It's unclear if any of the people thinking they could take on a gorilla—in an unfair 100 to 1 fight—were also among the 12% of men who back in 2019 said they could easily score a point on the tennis court against Serena Williams.
But it's giving a lot of the same energy.
There are two species of gorillas in the wild at present: the western gorilla and the eastern gorilla. Each of these species is further divided into two subspecies.
The eastern gorilla species consists of the subspecies Mountain gorilla and the Eastern Lowland gorilla—also referred to as the Grauer's gorilla. The western gorilla species consists of the Cross River gorilla and the Western Lowland gorilla subspecies.
Peppermint Narwhal Creative/Facebook
The largest of the subspecies are the Eastern Lowland gorilla. Silverback males can weigh up to 400 pounds and stand between 5'5″ to 6" tall, making them, at ideal weight, the heaviest primates alive.
Silverbacks are significantly larger and stronger than human males.
Their strength-to-mass ratio is estimated to be around 10 times their body weight. They can lift massive weights, tear down trees, and possess exceptional upper body strength.
But they are generally described as gentle giants known for a peaceful and sociable nature within their family groups of up to 30 individuals. While they will display aggression when threatened, they—unlike chimpanzees—generally avoid confrontations with other gorilla groups or other species in their habitat.
Why 100 men would want to pick a fight with a gorilla might be the bigger question that needs to be answered.
Keep ReadingShow less
GOP Lawmaker Dragged After Admitting He Has No Evidence Of Student 'Furries' Using Litter Boxes
May 02, 2025
Texas Republican state Representative Stan Gerdes admitted on Wednesday that a bill he sponsored served no purpose and addressed an issue that never existed in American schools.
His bill, HB54, would ban "furries" from classrooms. Furries are a subculture that enjoys dressing up and acting like non-human animals.
In an attempt to be clever, Gerdes named his bill the Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education— F.U.R.R.I.E.S.—Act.
According to his bill, students would be expelled for engaging in "non-human behavior" other than on "exempt days."
Texas HB54
Of greatest importance to the Texas Republican is ensuring students don't use litter boxes.
The bill states:
"'Non-Human Behavior' means any type of behavior or accessory displayed by a student in a school district other than behaviors or accessories typically displayed by a member of the homo sapiens species including: (A) using a litter box for the passing of stool, urine, or other human byproducts"
Texas HB54
Republicans across the country have repeatedly trotted out this lie as a means to promote their efforts to defund public schools and to manufacture a slippery slope to support their transphobic agenda.
But Texas Democratic state Representative James Talarico was unwilling to let it slide.
He confronted Gerdes about the purpose of his bill and the necessity of wasting legislative time on it.
Representative Talarico asked:
"Can you name a school where it has been confirmed that students are using litter boxes?"
Gerdes responded:
"Uh, well, what we do with this bill is we prevent that from happening."
You can see the exchange here:
@jamestalarico Greg Abbott is pushing the “FURRIES Act” claiming schools are giving litter boxes to students who act like cats. But when I asked the bill author, he couldn’t name one school providing litter boxes to kids. This is all part of Abbott’s smear campaign against our public schools.
Undeterred by Gerdes non-answer, Representative Talarico asked again:
"Can you name a school where it has been confirmed that students are using litter boxes?"
The Texas Democrat pointed out how Gerdes used the existence of litter boxes in schools to gain public support and media attention.
Representative Talarico stated:
"This was at the top of your press release. This was mentioned when you introduced this bill. Created quite a stir."
"So I’m asking, can you name a school where it’s been confirmed that there are litter boxes being provided to students?"
Gerdes replied:
"For this purpose? No, I cannot."
Representative Talarico explained the purpose of his question, saying:
"I find it concerning that these types of debunked conspiracy theories are being used by politicians at the highest levels of our government, including in this legislature, who know that they’re incorrect."
He then asked Gerdes:
"Are you aware that [Texas Republican] Governor Abbott said, quote, 'Kids go to school dressed up as cats with litter boxes in their classrooms?'"
Abbott exploited the litter box lie to push for public funding for private school vouchers.
Gerdes simply responded:
"Sure."
Representative Talarico continued, adding:
"Are you also aware that when the governor was asked by the 'Dallas Morning News' to name a single school where this happened, he couldn’t, and PolitiFact called this a 'pants-on-fire' false claim started by online rumors?"
After Gerdes said, "OK," Representative Talarico asked him:
"Do you think it’s a good use of our time to write laws based on debunked internet conspiracy theories?"
Gerdes admitted the litter box story he used repeatedly in the press was a lie, but claimed:
"Well, this isn’t, uh—this piece of legislature before us covers that among other things that are true."
Gerdes failed to specify what those other things that weren't lies were.
Representative Talarico called out several lies being spun by the GOP.
People agreed that Republicans' manufactured outrage is a waste of time that could be better used on real issues.
@fuzzwolf/Bluesky
@nikisumrow/Bluesky
@dogpatch/Bluesky
@mmasnick/Bluesky
The GOP is, if nothing else, dedicated to their lies.
The " litter boxes in schools" lie spawned in 2022 from the anti-LGBTQ+ propaganda created by Chaya Raichik on her once anonymous "Libs of TikTok" social media accounts.
MAGA Republicans then falsely claimed public schools were catering to furries and providing students with litter boxes instead of toilets. The lie prompted similar debate or proposed legislation in Nebraska, Michigan, North Dakota, and Oklahoma.
The truth that inspired Raichik to create her viral lie was teachers sharing on TikTok the emergency buckets/boxes stocked in their classrooms in preparation for school shootings.
@notsilencednow/X
Many of those buckets include kitty litter so children can relieve themselves in a bucket with some dignity instead of soiling their clothing.
If Republicans really want to eliminate kitty litter in classrooms, it looks like they should start by addressing gun violence.
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More