Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Rand Paul Slammed After Defending Russia's Invasion Of Ukraine Since It Was 'Part Of The Soviet Union'

Rand Paul Slammed After Defending Russia's Invasion Of Ukraine Since It Was 'Part Of The Soviet Union'
C-SPAN

Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky was slammed after defending Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, saying Putin's invasion was justified because Ukraine was once "part of the Soviet Union."

Paul issued the remarks with Secretary of State Antony Blinken in attendance, arguing President Joe Biden provoked Putin into ordering the invasion because he supported Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's calls for Ukraine to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).


Blinken, who'd appeared at the hearing to convince lawmakers to approve the Biden administration's State Department budget, strongly disagreed with Paul's assessment, stressing even countries that were once in the Soviet Union's orbit have "the fundamental right... to decide their own future."

You can watch their exchange in the video below.

Blinken had countered Paul's argument that American soldiers would "be fighting in Ukraine" if Ukraine joined NATO, pointing out that countries Russia had attacked in the past, a list that includes Georgia and Moldova, "were not part of NATO."

But when Blinken noted that Russia "has not attacked NATO countries for probably very good reasons," referring to the complete agreement between NATO allies that an attack against one member is an attack against all, Paul issued the following response:

"“You could also argue that the countries they’ve attacked were part of Russia... or were part of the Soviet Union."

When Blinken replied that the fact that these countries were once part of the Soviet Union does not "give Russia the right to attack them," Paul denied that he was attempting to justify Russia's invasion, though he went on to say, incorrectly, that Ukraine and Georgia “were part of the Soviet Union since the 1920s.”

But the damage was done.

Video of the exchange quickly circulated across social media, exposing Paul to heavy criticism from those who skewered his logic and accused him of regurgitating Kremlin propaganda.


Paul's statements were especially egregious given that in the weeks before the invasion, Russia had issued several security demands the United States and its allies rejected.

Putin aims to curtail the enlargement of NATO, seeking to bar Ukraine from joining the alliance in a bid to assert Russia’s influence over its neighbors, aspirations that gained further prominence after Putin seized the Crimean Penninsula in 2014.

Although Ukraine is not yet a member of NATO, it is partnered with the military alliance. This development angered Putin, who views Ukraine not as an independent nation but as land lost as a result of the end of the Cold War, which resulted in the Soviet Union's collapse and diminished Russia's superpower status.

Putin had left world leaders guessing as to whether or not he actually wanted to proceed with an invasion though he clearly wants NATO to curb military exercises in Ukraine and in other former Soviet satellite states, demands that resulted in a diplomatic stalemate.

More from Trending

Michelle Obama
Michelle Obama/YouTube

Michelle Obama Just Got Brutally Honest About Why She Won't Run For President—And Oof

On Wednesday, November 5, former First Lady Michelle Obama was joined on stage for a live podcast taping at the Brooklyn Academy of Music (BAM) by award-winning actor Tracee Ellis Ross.

The duo discussed the stories behind Michelle Obama’s new book The Look, and the podcast was posted on YouTube on Friday, November 14.

Keep ReadingShow less
Glen Powell
Saturday Night Live/YouTube

Glen Powell's Heartwarming Full-Circle Moment After Finally Getting To Host 'SNL' Has Fans Tearing Up

When we really want something to happen, it's easy to get impatient and forget two vital truths: sometimes the best things truly are worth the wait, and sometimes, one door has to close for another one to open.

Top Gun: Maverick star Glen Powell had to learn those truths the hard way when he was invited by Saturday Night Live to host several years ago, back when the Top Gun sequel was first set to grace the big screen.

Keep ReadingShow less
Actor Andrew Briedis reacts on TikTok to discovering that Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt: Kimmy vs. the Reverend has disappeared from Netflix — along with his eight-second cameo as Dev the Trainer.
@andrewbriedis/TikTok

Actor Calls Out Netflix After They Removed Interactive 'Kimmy Schmidt' Movie From Platform

What the foop is going on with Netflix’s Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt?

One minute you’re happily rewatching the gang from Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, and the next the streaming giant has pulled a Titus and dramatically exited the room, taking the series finale’s interactive special, Kimmy vs. the Reverend, with it.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jasmine Crockett; Marjorie Taylor Greene
Win McNamee/Getty Images; Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Jasmine Crockett Stuns Supporters By Offering Some Advice To MTG Amid Her Public Rift From Trump

Texas Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett stunned supporters after she shared some words of wisdom for her sometimes foe Marjorie Taylor Greene after President Donald Trump withdrew his support of her amid their fallout.

Trump distanced himself from Greene after she told Politico that she thinks Trump is going in “insanely the wrong direction to go" by pushing back against efforts to release the Epstein files. She called releasing the files and supporting the victims of the late financier, pedophile, and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein "just like the most common sense, easiest thing in the world."

Keep ReadingShow less
Brenay Kennard and Timothy Montague
@WRAL/TikTok

TikTok Influencer Ordered To Pay A Whopping $1.75 Million After Flaunting Affair And Breaking Up A Marriage

When people judge someone for having an affair, they usually set aside a certain amount of malice, specifically for the affair partner who involved themselves in someone else's marriage or long-term relationship.

But there's a special type of rage and judgment reserved for affair partners who appear to revel in breaking up someone's marriage and even flaunt their behavior in some way. The affair itself is already disrespectful enough, but flaunting it takes it to another level.

Keep ReadingShow less