Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Journalist Who Was Invited Into 'War Plans' Group Chat Bluntly Calls Out Trump Administration's Lies

Jeffrey Goldberg
CNN

After Pete Hegseth claimed that "nobody was texting war plans" on a Trump administration Signal chat, Jeffrey Goldberg brutally fact-checked him on CNN.

Make us preferred on Google

At noon on Monday, The Atlantic's editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, published an article about top members of the administration of Republican President Donald Trump discussing national security and military actions on Signal—a free, open-source messaging app.

How did Goldberg know about this serious national security violation?


As reported by The Atlantic:

"The world found out shortly before 2 p.m. eastern time on March 15 that the United States was bombing Houthi targets across Yemen."
"I, however, knew two hours before the first bombs exploded that the attack might be coming. The reason I knew this is that Pete Hegseth, the [Secretary of Defense], had texted me the war plan at 11:44 a.m."
"The plan included precise information about weapons packages, targets, and timing."

By Monday evening, the news media—and social media—was awash with commentary about security protocols and incompetence in the Trump administration.

Hegseth was asked, by the press gaggle that greeted his plane in Hawaii on Monday afternoon, to comment on his actions as detailed in The Atlantic article "The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans."

Hegseth claimed:

"Nobody was texting war plans."

@jackthny/X

Trump's current White House Press Secretary, Karoline Leavitt, took to social media to spin more tales to deflect from the truth about 11 members of Trump's team using a commercial group chat app instead of the secure communications technology available to them that is required by regulation and law.

Leavitt posted a long message on X, claiming:

"Jeffrey Goldberg is well-known for his sensationalist spin. Here are the facts about his latest story:"
"1. No 'war plans' were discussed.
2. No classified material was sent to the thread.
3. The White House Counsel’s Office has provided guidance on a number of different platforms for President Trump’s top officials to communicate as safely and efficiently as possible."
"As the National Security Council stated, the White House is looking into how Goldberg’s number was inadvertently added to the thread."
"Thanks to the strong and decisive leadership of President Trump, and everyone in the group, the Houthi strikes were successful and effective. Terrorists were killed and that’s what matters most to President Trump."

@PressSec/X

Leavitt's post received pushback.

@BonkDaCarnivore/X



Meanwhile, Trump himself claimed to have no idea what was going on.

Which might be the only truthful Trump administration response to his team's latest national security faux pas.

But Goldberg wouldn't let the Trump administration's lies go unchallenged.

In a Monday evening appearance on CNN, host Kaitlan Collins asked Goldberg about Hegseth's denials about the content of the unsecured Signal messages received from the Trump administration group chat. Collins shared that Hegseth said there were "no war plans" texted.

The Atlantic editor responded:

"No, that's a lie."
"He was texting war plans. He was texting attack plans, when targets were going to be targeted, how they were going to be targeted, who was at the targets, when the next sequence of attacks were happening?"

Goldberg shared that he kept the most damaging content out of the article for national security reasons.

"I didn't publish this. And I continue not to publish it because it felt like it was too confidential, too technical. And I worry, honestly, that sharing that kind of information in public could endanger American military personnel."

Goldberg concluded his rebuttal of Hegseth's excuse, stating:

"But no, they were-they were plans for the attack. They were texted before the attack."

You can watch Goldberg's comments on Hegseth's denials in this clip shared by CNN's Collins:

You can watch the full 10-minute CNN interview with Goldberg here:

- YouTubeyoutu.be

The Signal group chat's existence—and message thread content—was confirmed by National Security Council spokesperson Brian Hughes on Monday, despite Hegseth's and Leavitt's statements to the contrary.

A total of 11 members of the Trump administration participated in the unsecured group chat:

  1. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth
  2. Vice President JD Vance
  3. National Security Advisor Michael Waltz
  4. CIA Director John Ratcliffe
  5. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard
  6. White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles
  7. "MAR," who Goldberg wrote is likely to be Secretary of State Marco Rubio
  8. "SM," who Goldberg wrote is likely to be Stephen Miller
  9. Joe Kent, Trump's nominee to lead the National Counterterrorism Center
  10. U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff
  11. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent

Calls for Hegseth and others to resign began almost immediately after their violation of well-established security protocols was revealed.

JD Vance should resign. Stephen Miller should resign. EVERYONE ON THAT SIGNAL CHAT SHOULD RESIGN
— Dittie (@dittie.bsky.social) March 25, 2025 at 11:58 AM



Hegseth. Must. Resign. #ResignHegseth
— Jon Cooper (@joncooper-us.bsky.social) March 24, 2025 at 9:34 PM





Pete Hegseth texted war plans to a reporter at The Atlantic. BUT HER EMAILS. Hegseth should resign today.
— David Pakman (@davidpakman.bsky.social) March 24, 2025 at 3:23 PM



Hegseth, Gabbard and Vance should resign. It's really that serious.
— Altnoaa 🇺🇸 (@altnoaa.bsky.social) March 24, 2025 at 5:40 PM



When the stakes are this high, incompetence is not an option. Pete Hegseth should resign. Mike Waltz should resign.
— Senator Mark Warner (@markwarner.bsky.social) March 25, 2025 at 10:08 AM



In any other administration of the past 80 years, the defense secretary and the national security advisor would, following an equivalent scandal, now resign.
— Anne Applebaum (@anneapplebaum.bsky.social) March 25, 2025 at 10:29 AM


Hegseth - RESIGN Vance - RESIGN Rubio - RESIGN Gabbard - RESIGN Waltz - RESIGN Ratcliffe - RESIGN Wiles - RESIGN Trump - RESIGN You are all guilty of violating national security laws and should be nowhere near any information classified higher than gossip.
— crazynetjunkie.bsky.social (@crazynetjunkie.bsky.social) March 25, 2025 at 11:37 AM

But this isn't the first time a Trump official ignored national security protocols.

In 2019 during Trump's first term in office, White House Senior Advisor—and son-in-law—Jared Kushner was cited by cybersecurity and national security experts for using WhatsApp to communicate with foreign government officials, including Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

Now six years later, different app but same old carelessness.

More from News/political-news

Screenshots from @georgiamaythornley's TikTok video
@georgiamaythornley/TikTok

TikToker Lays Out 5 'Tiny Habits' She Stopped Doing After Realizing She Keeps Spending All Her Money

Most people are going to struggle to save money and maintain a budget at least once in their lives, and the most important thing they can do is be honest about their role in their own finances.

TikToker @georgiamaythornley, for example, finally admitted to herself that she was always spending all of her money before she could set any aside for savings, so she started tracking her spending habits.

Keep ReadingShow less
Marco Rubio and Kimberly Guilfoyle
Mark Schiefelbein / POOL / AFP via Getty Images

Marco Rubio Awkwardly Dodges Question About Kimberly Guilfoyle's Blatant Corruption—As She's Standing Just Feet Away

Secretary of State Marco Rubio was criticized after he shut down a question about former Fox News host and current U.S. Ambassador to Greece Kimberly Guilfoyle following a Wall Street Journal report alleging that she engaged in illegal conduct.

The WSJ reported that Guilfoyle asked Eric Deters, a Trump donor and former congressional candidate, to cover $100,000 in credit card debt before her Senate confirmation hearings. The report said she contacted him through Signal, pressing him to arrange the payment that day and explaining how to send the funds directly to American Express.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. President Donald Trump waves as he leaves the stage after speaking during a campaign rally at the Freeman Coliseum.
Win McNamee/Getty Images

Artist Brutally Rips Trump With Naked 'Orange Plague' Sculpture In European Parliament

President Donald Trump has finally received the golden treatment in Europe, although the 8.5-foot-tall naked statue now towering inside the European Parliament probably isn't the tribute he had in mind.

Unveiled in Strasbourg, France, the 23-karat-gold-coated sculpture depicts Trump perched on the shoulders of a smaller, visibly burdened man, clutching an oversized golf club in one hand and the scales of justice in the other.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @bsquaredtravels_'s Instagram reel
@bsquaredtravels_/Instagram

Swedish Man Goes Viral With Hack For Optimizing Taco Fillings—And It's Honestly Genius

There's a lot of discourse when it comes to tacos: what qualifes as a taco, what kind of shell to use, which fillings are acceptable... But one thing we can all agree on? You can never have too many tacos.

Instagrammer @bsquaredtravels_ shared a video of their Swedish brother-in-law totally hacking the system when it comes to tacos, and the internet has gone crazy for it.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @maddie_bado's TikTok video
@maddie_bado/TikTok

Woman Sparks Debate After Sharing The Signs That You Have A 'Loser Boyfriend' In Viral Videos

Every person who chooses to date will have a list of wished-for traits, attractive traits, and of course, dealbreakers that would likely end the relationship either immediately or, at least, eventually.

TikToker @maddie_bado shared a series on TikTok called "Signs of a Loser Boyfriend," which she believes more women should be aware of so that they can make the most informed decision about what they are gaining from their relationship and whether their partner is able to give them what they want, and vice versa.

Keep ReadingShow less