Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

NASA Removes 'Insensitive' Nicknames For Certain Cosmic Objects To 'Make Science More Inclusive'

NASA Removes 'Insensitive' Nicknames For Certain Cosmic Objects To 'Make Science More Inclusive'
NASA.gov

Many cosmic objects are known to scientists by unofficial nicknames, but not all of those nicknames are created equal. As it turns out, some are downright offensive.

NASA is working to change this by evaluating the nicknames currently in use and making changes to those that are insensitive.


There has been a general trend toward inclusivity and righting past wrongs lately, and NASA is getting in on the action.

In a statement posted on NASA.gov, the agency explained their reasoning for changing the way they refer to these cosmic features whose names are problematic:

"As the scientific community works to identify and address systemic discrimination and inequality in all aspects of the field, it has become clear that certain cosmic nicknames are not only insensitive, but can be actively harmful."
"NASA is examining its use of unofficial terminology for cosmic objects as part of its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion."

Among those cited as problematic is NGC 2392, a planetary nebula whose nickname includes a term for the Indigenous peoples of the Arctic circle which many find offensive.

The associate administrator of NASA's Science Mission Directorate at Headquarters, Thomas Zurbuchen, talked a bit about why the change is important.

"I support our ongoing reevaluation of the names by which we refer to astronomical objects. Our goal is that all names are aligned with our values of diversity and inclusion, and we'll proactively work with the scientific community to help ensure that."
"Science is for everyone, and every facet of our work needs to reflect that value."

NASA will be working with "diversity, inclusion, and equity experts in the astronomical and physical sciences" to review other nicknames and make changes where appropriate.

Unfortunately, much of the reaction to NASA's announcement on social media seems to be people insisting that the change is unnecessary and that NASA is just caving to "woke culture."

It is probably safe to say that these people have never tried to learn about astronomy, only to encounter a celestial object whose name contains a racial slur used against their people.

Stephen T. Shih, Associate Administrator for Diversity and Equal Opportunity at NASA Headquarters also recognized the need for change.

"These nicknames and terms may have historical or culture connotations that are objectionable or unwelcoming, and NASA is strongly committed to addressing them."
"Science depends on diverse contributions, and benefits everyone, so this means we must make it inclusive."

Inclusivity, by its very nature, creates opportunities and embraces people's differences and strengths. It costs nothing to change an offensive name, and is a great first step toward making science more accessible for everyone.

More from Trending

dog and cat snuggling together
Krista Mangulsone on Unsplash

Times Pet Owners 'Severely Underestimated' Their Pets' Intelligence

I've lived with cats—because no one owns a feline—most of my life. Some have been very clever creatures while others were real dingbats.

Family members have owned dogs whose talents also ran the gamut.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scott Bessent
Meet the Press/NBC News

Scott Bessent Blasted Over His Bonkers Suggestion For How To Bring Your Own Inflation Rate Down

Continuing to follow the example of MAGA Republican President Donald Trump, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent appeared on Meet the Press Sunday to blame Democratic President Joe Biden for the financial downturn caused by Trump's tariff fiasco, then lied repeatedly about the state of the economy.

Meet the Press host Kristen Welker played a clip of MAGA Republican Vice President JD Vance telling a conservative audience at a Breitbart News event that Americans owe the Trump administration "a little bit of patience"—apparently while they figure out what tariffs are and how they work since they're rolling back more of them to lower consumer prices despite claiming Trump's tariffs don't affect consumer prices.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lindsay Lohan attends the men's final during day fifteen of the 2025 US Open Tennis Championships at USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center.
Elsa/Getty Images

Lindsay Lohan Is Now Sporting A New Accent—And Fans Aren't Sure What To Make Of It

In a twist freakier than a sequel to Freaky Friday, Lindsay Lohan has debuted yet another new accent—this time at the Fashion Trust Arabia Awards in Doha, Qatar.

Draped in a maroon, jewel-trimmed gown by The New Arrivals Ilkyaz Ozel and accompanied by her husband, Bader Shammas, and their 2-year-old son, Luai, the actress looked serene, elegant, and completely unbothered by the collective whiplash she was about to inflict on the internet.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jameela Jamil
Gilbert Flores/Variety/Getty Images

Jameela Jamil Speaks Out Against The Rise Of The 'Aesthetic Of Emaciation' Among Women In Hollywood

Content Warning: eating disorders, thinness as an aesthetic, emaciation in Hollywood

There's no denying that we've been gifted with some incredible music, television shows, and films this year.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump; Screenshot of Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker in "Rush Hour 2"
Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images; New Line Cinema

Trump Is Now Using His Presidential Sway To Pressure Studio Into Making 'Rush Hour 4'—And, Huh?

President Trump has reportedly pressured Paramount head Larry Ellison to make another sequel to Rush Hour, his favorite buddy-cop movie, as the company looks to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery.

The first Rush Hour film, starring Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker, was released in 1998, received positive reviews, and made $245 million worldwide. Chan and Tucker returned for two sequels released in 2001 and 2007 respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less