Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Dem Senator Gives Education Secretary A Basic Math Lesson After Her Epic Flub

Screenshots of Jack Reed and Linda McMahon
C-SPAN

Education Secretary Linda McMahon got schooled by Democratic Senator Jack Reed after she grossly mistated how much the proposed cuts for the department over 10 years would actually save.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon was given a necessary math lesson by Democratic Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island after she completely mistated how much the proposed cuts for the department over 10 years would actually save.

McMahon's error occured during McMahon’s testimony on the Trump administration's 2026 budget proposal, which outlines significant cuts to the Department of Education (DOE)—including the near-total elimination of programs like TRIO and GEAR UP.


TRIO encompasses a set of federal initiatives designed to support low-income, first-generation college students and students with disabilities in pursuing higher education. In 2024, the DOE allocated $1.191 billion to TRIO programs.

GEAR UP, another federal grant initiative, helps low-income students prepare for postsecondary education. It received $388 million in funding in 2024. Under Trump’s proposed “skinny budget,” nearly all funding for TRIO and GEAR UP would be slashed as part of broader efforts to dismantle the DOE, actions that advocates say will be a detriment to students nationwide.

Appearing before the Senate appropriations subcommittee on education, McMahon nodded in agreement as Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana stated that the U.S. spends $1.58 billion annually on the TRIO and GEAR UP federal grant programs and claimed that, over 10 years, the cost would exceed "a trillion dollars."

With those figures, even over a decade, the total would fall far short of $1 trillion based on simple math—by about $984 billion.

A total of $1.58 billion over 10 years actually amounts to approximately $15.8 billion. But that kind of math appeared to allude both Kennedy and McMahon.

Then Reed stepped in:

"Madam Secretary, I’m not a great mathematician, but I think you were talking about a trillion dollars? I believe $1.5 billion times 10 is $15 billion, that’s a little bit off from a trillion dollars."

McMahon, sounding pretty confident, said:

“I think the budget cuts $1.2 billion for TRIO.”

Reed responded:

“Well, $1.2 billion that would be $12 billion, not a trillion dollars."

A flustered McMahon blinked and could merely utter, "Okay."

You can see their exchange in the video below.

McMahon was criticized after footage of her remarks went viral, and many agreed this was not a great moment for someone tasked with leading the nation's education initiatives.

The publicly available request on the DOE's website says the agency is seeking $66.7 billion in new discretionary budget authority—indeed a $12 billion—or 15.3%—decrease from the previous year.

The report notes that the budget request "advances President Trump’s plan to reach balance and restore confidence in America’s fiscal management by eliminating spending that does not support meaningful learning and returning responsibility for services that are better provided by the States, local governments, or civil society organizations to each respectively."

Some Republicans, including Trump, have called for the agency’s complete elimination. In March, Trump signed an executive order aimed at dismantling the department. Critics have pointed out that fully shutting down the agency would likely require an act of Congress.

More from News/political-news

Donald Trump
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Trump Hit With Epic Math Lesson After Making Absurd Claim About Lowering Drug Prices

Percentages are a part of mathematics that a lot of students struggle with. But they should be a breeze for any alumnus of Fordham University or a Penn State Wharton School of Business graduate with a bachelor's degree in economics, like MAGA Republican President Donald Trump.

For example, if you're talking about tangible items, like prices for prescription drugs, those can increase by any percentage, and often do.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kim Kardashian
Amy Sussman/Getty Images

Kim Kardashian Just Showed Off An Impossibly Tight Outfit—And Fans Wonder How She Can Even Breathe

When we think of Kim Kardashian and what she's likely to wear, most of us picture something form-fitting and/or revealing, especially when it's for a special event.

But Kardashian took "tight" to a new level when she appeared in a recent piece from a Mugler fashion show. The piece is black, sheer, and sparkling, with long vertical lines. It fully covers the neck, arms, chest, and legs, with peek-a-boo cutouts on the thighs, inner thighs, and buttocks.

Keep ReadingShow less
Phillie Phanatic; Andy Byron and Kristin Cabot
Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images/Getty Images; instaagraace/TikTok

The Phillies Mascot Just Recreated The Coldplay Kiss Cam Scandal—And It's Comedy Gold

To anyone out there with a bonus relationship, let this be a reminder: not only might you get caught cheating, but you might also go viral and get your situation turned into a meme.

At least that's what happened to now-former Astronomer CEO Andy Byron and his Chief People Officer, Kristin Cabot, with whom he was having a relationship, despite having a wife and kids.

Keep ReadingShow less
Wide shot of a mansion with fancy, black convertible parked out front.

People Share Dark Secrets About Working For The Ultra-Wealthy

Some say that being filthy rich isn't all it's cracked up to be.

Sometimes, it's just filthy.

Keep ReadingShow less
The clacker B1 Battle Droids
Disney/LucasFilm

Robots labeled 'Star Wars' slur

Artificial Intelligence and robots can thank the droids from Star Wars for the internet-appropriated slur “clanker,” which has been used to insult real-world technology as automation slowly creeps into and takes over daily life.

According to Wookieepedia (yeah, I went there), the word “clanker” was first used as a slang term because the joints of the droids would, well, clank against their metal bodies.

Keep ReadingShow less