Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Georgia DA Just Stepped Up Her Investigation Into Trump's Election Interference With a Major New Hire

Georgia DA Just Stepped Up Her Investigation Into Trump's Election Interference With a Major New Hire
FultonCountyGovernment/ YouTube// Noam Galai/Getty Images

Many were surprised to learn that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, who is investigating election interference by Donald Trump in the state of Georgia, hired a renowned racketeering expert, Atlanta lawyer John Floyd, to help with her case.

The move was unusual because federal RICO law requires some kind of underlying criminal act in which the alleged enterprise engaged. Such crimes usually involve drugs, money laundering, gambling, or physical harm to others, none of which is at issue in this case.


But this is a potential state RICO action that Willis may bring, and Floyd is known for having written a national guide on prosecuting state racketeering cases.

That matters here because the federal RICO statute lacks something that Georgia specifically lists as prohibited criminal conduct under its RICO law: the making of false statements.

Section 10-5-54 of the Georgia Code (2010) states:

"It is unlawful for a person to make or cause to be made, in a record that is used in an action or proceeding or filed under this chapter, a statement that, at the time and in the light of the circumstances under which it is made, is false or misleading in a material respect…."

Thus, under GA law, says Cathy Cox, the dean of the Mercer School of Law in Georgia and Georgia's former Secretary of State:

"If Donald Trump engaged in two or more acts that involve false statements—that were made knowingly and willfully in an attempt to falsify material fact, like the election results—then you can piece together a violation of the racketeering act."

Admittedly, Willis will face a high hurdle.

Willis will have to prove that Trump knew that his claims of election fraud were false when he made them, or he won't have the required state of mind for the violation to stick.

Trump is generally fairly careful to pepper even his veiled threats with enough plausible deniability to cover his tracks. His lawyers will point to the many instances where Trump was adamant on the phone with Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia Secretary of State, that the election was stolen from him illegally and argue that he clearly did not know the statements were false as he was making them. (The same caution may not be true for Trump's associates, including Rudy Giuliani, who is a lawyer, who saw the evidence, and who then nevertheless made several false statements to Georgia officials. Would Rudy flip on Trump if leaned on?)

But the infamous recorded Raffensperger call isn't the only evidence now before Willis. A bombshell investigative report by the Wall Street Journal, which dropped just this week, has unearthed a second recorded conversation between Donald Trump and a Georgia official, in this case the Chief Investigator of the Georgia Secretary of State's office.

In that call, made in December of 2020, Trump urged the investigator to look for fraud during an audit of mail-in ballots in a suburban Atlanta County. "When the right answer comes out, you'll be praised," Trump intoned, after repeatedly saying that "something bad happened."

There may be further evidence coming from other officials whom the Trump campaign may have leaned on. If Willis can prove Trump and his cohorts intended to make false statements—basically that he and his campaign set out to lie or mislead in order to convince officials to throw the election Trump's way—they each could face a statutory minimum of a five-year sentence, or as much as 20 years, though that is highly unlikely.

But what are the real chances of conviction here?

On the one hand, while Trump may have violated the letter of the law, the state RICO statute covering false statements was intended to stop the deceptive marketing of securities, and not really to cover false statements made to election officials. It's very possible a judge could rule this is a stretch too far. It's also possible, as discussed above, that there simply isn't enough evidence to show Trump intended to lie—or that he lies so much he doesn't even know when he's lying. His attorneys will muddy the waters here easily.

On the other hand, Willis has experience handling complex state RICO claims, having prosecuted a case under Georgia's racketeering law against twelve former teachers, principals and administrators accused of inflating scores on standardized tests in order to receive promotions and bonuses. After a lengthy investigation and trial, eleven were convicted, and some received prison time.

Willis's newly hired RICO expert, John Floyd, was on the education fraud case with her. "I've worked on some pretty intense cases over the years," said Floyd. "But as far as duration and complexity, that would be hard to match."

Willis's RICO case against Trump likely would handily beat that.

More from People/donald-trump

Screenshot of Nick Fuentes
America First

White Nationalist Admits That Liberals Were Right About Trump Being A 'Demagogue'

Far-right pundit and white nationalist Nick Fuentes admitted on his show that "liberals were right, fundamentally" about President Donald Trump, acknowledging Trump's brand of authoritarian populism by referring to him as a "populist demagogue."

In its modern sense, a demagogue is a political agitator who seeks to advance their political goals or personal power by appealing to people’s emotions, prejudices, and hardships.

Keep ReadingShow less
scene from Disney's Pocahontas
Disney

'Based On A True Story' Movies That Aren't True At All

The entertainment industry has long been criticized for their creative license when it comes to retelling history or anything "based on a true story."

Going back to the silent film era and D.W. Griffith's ridiculously inaccurate White supremacist propaganda Birth Of A Nation to Mel Gibson's Braveheart to Disney's Pocahontas, some films go way beyond creative license and careen into total malarkey.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person holding a fan of cash.
person holding fan of U.S. dollars banknote

People Describe The Moment They Realized They Were Privileged

There is little more off-putting than when people flaunt their wealth and privilege in other people's faces.

On the flip side, not everyone takes kindly to wealthy people who act like they're "one of us".

Keep ReadingShow less
Elon Musk
Kevin Lamarque/Pool/AFP via Getty Images

Musk's AI Chatbot Throws Republicans Under The Bus After Being Asked About Economy

Grok, billionaire Elon Musk's very own chatbot, threw Republicans under the bus after software engineer Alex Coke asked it if Democrats or Republicans have been better for the economy in the past 30 years, only for it to answer that yes, in fact, Democrats are the winners when it comes to economic policy.

Economic policy is certainly on everyone's minds these days. A new CNN poll conducted by SSRS shows that Americans are not pleased with President Donald Trump’s management of the economy, leaving him with unfavorable ratings on what is considered the nation’s most important issue.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Donald Trump
Fox 5 Washington D.C./YouTube

CNN Airs Brutal Reminder Of Trump's Previous Economic Predictions—And They Did Not Age Well

CNN came with the receipts, airing a supercut of clips from 2020 and 2024 of President Donald Trump making hilariously wrong economic predictions—a damning reel of evidence as financial markets decline and investor concerns grow over Trump’s trade policies.

In fact, Trump’s escalating trade war pushed the S&P 500 more than 10% below its record high set just last month. A drop of this size is significant enough that professional investors call it a “correction,” and the S&P 500’s 1.4% decline on Thursday marked its first since 2023.

Keep ReadingShow less