Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Alex Wellerstein Develops Interactive 'Nukemap' that Gauges Your Survival Chances During a Nuclear Attack

Alex Wellerstein Develops Interactive 'Nukemap' that Gauges Your Survival Chances During a Nuclear Attack
(Galerie Bilderwelt/Getty Images, @FritzQS/Twitter)

The threat of a nuclear disaster is looming and it doesn't help that the president just antagonized Vladimir Putin over Syria's recent chemical attacks.

Thanks to a new interactive map, we won't have to imagine the consequences of a potential nuclear attack. We can see a simulation of one and still come out of it alive.


How many people would die? What would remain after an explosion? You can find out the magnitude of destruction from a nuclear attack thanks to an interactive map that allows you to drop a bomb anywhere in the world for a horrific but fascinating simulation.

To help us visualize the impact of a nuclear blast in any designated place in the world, Alex Wellerstein – a historian of science at Stevens Institute of Technology – developed the interactive browser called the "NUKEMAP."



The historian of nuclear weapons created the first iteration of the browser in 2012 as he was writing a book about "the history of nuclear secrecy in the United States from the Manhattan Project through the War on Terror."

We live in a world where nuclear weapons issues are on the front pages of our newspapers on a regular basis, yet most people still have a very bad sense of what an exploding nuclear weapon can actually do.

In July 2013, Wellerstein upgraded the browser to "NUKEMAP2" enabling faster calculations based on fireball size, radiation zones, and air blast radius and renders visual results on Google Maps.

The system can operate specific functions allowing users to see a drifting cloud of radioactive fallout depending on weather conditions based on the geographic location.




Wellerstein, who insists is a "historian of physics, not a physicist," explained to Business Insider how he wanted to demonstrate the effects of a nuclear blast through "NUKEMAP."

A realistic understanding of what nuclear weapons can and can't do is necessary for any discussion that involves them," Wellerstein told Business Insider in an email. "People tend to have either wildly exaggerated views of the weapons, or wildly under-appreciate their power, if they have thoughts about them at all. It can lead to hysterical policies of all sorts.



The map allows users to create a hypothetical nuclear bomb by choosing preset options of historical detonations, including the B-83 – The largest bomb in the current U.S. arsenal, "Little Bomb" – The bomb used in Hiroshima, and the R-12 (SS-4) – The Soviet missile from the Cuban Missile Crisis.



Users can also choose the height of burst, whether it be in the air or on the surface. Once the options are selected, it's bombs away by a simple click of the "detonate" button.

Business Insider experimented with NUKEMAP2 by choosing the North Korea preset for their underground test blast from September 3, and dropped the bomb in San Francisco.

By default, Nukemap assumed a 150-kiloton-yield warhead would explode 1.03 miles above the city.
An aerial detonation maximizes a nuclear bomb's destructive power by allowing the blast's energy to spread. If a bomb were to detonate on the ground, the soil would absorb more of that energy.

The effects from the blast were separated into a radius with four zones of intensity. The furthermost ring was designated as the "Thermal Radiation" zone with a width of 6.54 miles.

Despite its position furthest from point of impact, the devastation is still nothing to brush off.

This region is flooded with skin-scorching ultraviolet light, burning anyone within view of the blast. "Third-degree burns extend throughout the layers of skin and are often painless because they destroy the pain nerves," Nukemap says. "They can cause severe scarring or disablement, and can require amputation."

The "Fireball" zone, situated at the heart of impact, indicated that "flames incinerate most buildings, objects, and people."

H/T - BusinessInsider, Twitter, NuclearSecrecy

More from Trending

Donald Trump holding photos of White House ballroom
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

CNN Just Used A Hilarious Poll To Show Just How Unpopular Trump's Ballroom Is—And We're Cackling

After President Donald Trump claimed that his new White House ballroom is "very popular" with the American public, CNN shared a hilariously shady poll that gets to the truth of the matter.

Last year, Trump ordered the demolition of the entire East Wing to make way for a 90,000 square-foot ballroom that will dwarf the size of the White House itself, sparking alarm from historical preservationists and the public alike.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @devynnehaddoxx's TikTok video
@devynnehaddoxx/TikTok

Woman In Labor Times How Long Her Husband Takes To Poop To See If She Can Push Their Baby Out Faster In Hilarious Viral Video

It's well-known across the internet that it takes forever for men to use the restroom. For dads especially, in the time it takes them to poop, when they return to the house, their kids will have aged seven years, and their baby will have learned to walk.

These are jokes, of course, but it's an internet consensus that men spend a really long time on the porcelain throne.

Keep ReadingShow less
David Letterman (left) has continued defending Stephen Colbert (right) as CBS faces backlash over canceling The Late Show.
Kevin Winter/Getty Images; Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images

David Letterman Rips 'Lying Weasels' At CBS For Claiming Colbert Was Canceled For Financial Reasons In Epic Takedown

David Letterman isn’t staying quiet about CBS canceling The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. As Colbert’s run comes to an end later this month, the former late-night host is publicly challenging the network’s claim that the decision was purely financial.

Letterman, who hosted The Late Show from 1993 until stepping down in 2015, addressed the controversy during a new interview with New York Times journalist Jason Zinoman.

Keep ReadingShow less
Antonia Eastwood; Gemma Monk
Antonia Eastwood/MSN; Cover Images

Woman Speaks Out After Prison Sentence To Reveal What Led Her To Hurl Black Paint At Sister-In-Law On Her Wedding Day

In early 2024, 49-year-old Antonia Eastwood married Ashley Monk after about five months of dating. During the ceremony, Antonia tripped while walking down the aisle.

Antonia and Ashley were both suspicious that she did not trip accidentally and that Ashley's sister, Gemma, actually tripped her. Gemma and Antonia were not close, and the couple also believed that Gemma might be jealous that they were marrying after five months, though she'd been with her childhood sweetheart for 20 years without tying the knot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Billie Eilish on 'Good Hang'
Good Hang with Amy Poehler/YouTube

Billie Eilish's Refreshingly Blunt Take On Aging And 'Botched' Plastic Surgery Has Fans Nodding Hard

You know what they say: the grass is greener on the other side. Most people want something that they don't have.

While many people right now are fixated on appearing younger than their age, Billie Eilish—who already looks younger than her age—is looking forward to what comes next.

Keep ReadingShow less