Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

MAGA Lawmaker Schooled By Democrat After He Tries To Claim That Intersex People Don't Exist

Andy Hopper; Lauren Ashley Simmons
Lone Star Left/YouTube

Republican Texas state Rep. Andy Hopper was called out by Democratic state Rep. Lauren Ashley Simmons after he wanted to eliminate funding for The University of Texas due to its LGBTQ+ programs without even knowing what "intersex" means.

In another case of Republican legislation based on ignorance, Texas MAGA Republican state Representative Andy Hopper embarrassed himself on the Texas House floor with a little help from Democratic Representative Lauren Ashley Simmons.

Hopper sought to add an amendment to a funding bill for the University of Texas at Austin to penalize the school for not eliminating any reference to non-White, cisgender, heteronormative people in their curriculum.


While introducing his amendment, Hopper stated:

"Despite repeated calls by our President, our governor, and our legislature, the University of Texas continues to put out an outsized focus offering degree programs and courses in lesbian, gay, and bisexual, transgender, queer studies and has continued a pattern of teaching discrimination hidden behind the words diversity, equity and inclusion."
"There are also programs that deny the unchangeable biological reality that there are only two sexes, male and female. These programs, and by extension this university, shall not be funded by tax dollars."

After Hopper yielded the floor for questions on his amendment, Democratic state Representative Simmons asked:

"Representative Hopper can you clarify what it means when a course does not comply with the biological reality that there are only two sexes?"

You can see their interaction here:

- YouTubeyoutu.be

Hopper responded:

"So if a course is teaching the student body of a university that gender is–that gender is somehow fluid, that there is some sort of way to change your gender, then that would violate what we're trying to say here."

Representative Simmons replied:

"So just for clarification before I move on, gender or [sex], can you clarify what you mean, 'cuz those are not one and the same."

Hopper continued to confuse gender with sex, saying:

"So when you're born and you have a set of chromosomes."

Representative Simmons pressed for clarity, asking:

"So are you speaking about–are you speaking about biological sex or are you speaking about gender, 'cuz one is scientific one is a social construct. 'Cuz I have a follow-up question."

Hopper was again confused, stating:

"Yeah, they're one and the same, ma'am."

Representative Simmons simply replied:

"That's not true. But moving on. Okay, so in the same vein, what about intersex individuals?"

Hopper—who previously touted an "unchangeable biological reality"—said:

"I don't even know what that means."

He then asked Representative Simmons to explain it to him.

She replied:

"I'll take it really slow. Since the beginning of time people have been born with either ambiguous genitalia or with or without ovaries, or both. And so those people from a biological standpoint exist."
"They're not mythical. It's not something we're making up. Which is why I asked you, are you speaking about gender or [sex] because, again, one is a social construct. One is more scientific-based. And that's why I was asking."

Hopper still insisted gender and biological sex were the same thing, claiming:

"So their gender is not a social construct. It's firmly rooted in biological reality."

After asking Hopper to repeat his misinformation, Representative Simmons asked:

"So again, intersex... intersex people... what about them? When we're talking about two biological sexes, what are we talking about when regarding intersex people?"

Instead of answering, Hopper asked Representative Simmons to explain intersex to him again.

Instead of repeating her explanation, Representative Simmons pointed out the absurdity of Hopper holding himself up as an authority on gender or biological sex.

@nowthisimpact

It might be time to bring sex ed back to Texas schools. During a Texas budget debate, Rep. Andy Hopper (R) proposed an amendment to completely cut state funding for UT Austin over its LGBTQIA+ and DEI-related programs. Rep. Lauren Ashley Simmons (D) patiently stepped up to educate him on intersex individuals. After nearly an hour of discussion, House parliamentarians ruled against Hopper’s amendment.

She said:

"You are not sure what intersex people are, if they exist or not, but you want to defund a program about something that you don't–that you don't quite understand."

Hopper—in typical MAGA Christian nationalist fashion—then turned to the Bible, saying:

"So the truth that is rooted in our biblical understanding that God set forth from the beginning of creation is that your gender is fixed at birth and you cannot change it."

But Representative Simmons wasn't falling for it.

She replied:

"Again, I want to clarify, gender as a social construct or a biological sex? And again you haven't yet answered my question about where do intersex people fall into that equation?"

Hopper then really displayed his ignorance of biology by replying:

"Yeah, those intersex individuals are still XX or XY. So you can't change that."

This prompted one of the Republicans gathered around Hopper to tug on his sleeve and quietly tell him:

"Andy, that is not true."

Representative Simmons then finished by moving to block consideration of Hopper's "biblically-based" amendment, telling the Texas House:

"Mr. Speaker, I raise a point of order against further consideration of the amendment under house rule 8, section 4, on the grounds that this amendment seeks to create general law through an appropriations bill."

People applauded Representative Simmons exposure of Hopper's ignorance.

@leftynavyseal/Bluesky


obsessed with texas representative Andy Hopper trying to claim that intersex people do not exist, only to be quickly told "Andy that's not true" bigots do not understand what they hate. they won't make an effort to
— casillus (@casillus.art) April 15, 2025 at 12:01 AM


www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/04/demo... “You are not sure what intersex people are, if they exist or not, but you want to defund a program about something that you don’t understand,” she said. “That’s why I’m seeking clarification.” Hopper would do better enrolling in the program to take courses

[image or embed]
— DrLouS (@drlous.bsky.social) April 15, 2025 at 11:19 PM


I have friends who are intersex, but I only know that because I am a safe place for people to be vulnerable and open. I'm guessing Rep. Andy Hopper of north Texas isn't.
— Sara Cress (@saracress.bsky.social) April 10, 2025 at 11:10 PM


This is why sex education is important. Andy Hopper doesn't realize that intersex people exist. "Andy, that's not true." 😂 Bless his heart. youtube.com/shorts/a6Bft...

[image or embed]
— Ben Sasser (@bensasser.bsky.social) April 15, 2025 at 2:30 PM


@derblab/Bluesky


he gets called out for trying to legislate something he's never heard of, when it's explained to him, he denies it exists, and then at the end, my favorite part, this lady (i don't know who she is) is caught on mic telling him he's telling lies www.youtube.com/shorts/a6Bft...

[image or embed]
— catastrophegirl (@catastrophegirl.bsky.social) April 15, 2025 at 6:47 PM

Hopper's amendment was eventually removed by Texas House parliamentarians after an hour of debate.

More from News/political-news

Donald Trump
Mehmet Eser/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images

Trump Demands 'Boss Of AT&T' Fix Equipment After Failed Conference Call In Bizarre Meltdown

When most of us have technical difficulties, we contact tech support or customer service.

But if you're President of the United States, just ranting on social media—then having your White House Press Secretary post a screenshot of your post on a social media platform people actually use—is apparently the answer.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Lauren Boebert speaking to Alex Stein
Prime Time with Alex Stein/Blaze Media

Lauren Boebert Casts Doubt On Moon Landing During Wild Interview With Conspiracy Theorist

Colorado Republican Representative Lauren Boebert was criticized after she seemingly agreed with the conspiracy theory that the moon landing was faked in a wide-ranging interview with conservative conspiracy theorist Alex Stein.

The segment began with the duo casting doubt on nuclear weapons—Boebert even joked about needing "tin foil"—and moved into weirder territory when Stein praised Boebert for "vibing" with him on the topic of the moon landing. Conspiracy theorists have long alleged the moon landing was fabricated by NASA in what they claim was an elaborate hoax.

Keep ReadingShow less
Rosie O'Donnell; Oprah Winfrey
Simon Ackerman/Getty Images; Ernesto Ruscio/GC Images

Rosie O'Donnell Calls Out Oprah For Attending Jeff Bezos' Wedding In Scathing Poem

Among the various celebrity hangers-on who attended Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez's Venice wedding, the one that seemed to generate the most controversy was Oprah Winfrey.

After all, a woman known for her progressive politics whose entire ethos is about teaching people how to be their best selves, attending the wedding of man who directly funded a fascist regime dismantling our country before our eyes doesn't exactly add up.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lisa Murkowski
Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images

Lisa Murkowski Slammed After Criticizing Massive Budget Bill She Just Voted For

Alaska Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski was slammed after she claimed that President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill is "not there yet" despite casting the deciding vote to narrowly pass it before sending it back to the House.

In a marathon voting session, the Senate narrowly passed the legislation in a 51-50 vote, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote after three Republicans joined all Democrats in opposition.

Keep ReadingShow less
Woman listening to her boyfriend play guitar
Photo by Toa Heftiba on Unsplash

Things People Initially Found Attractive About Their Partner That Now Annoy Them

Being in a relationship can be wonderful, but it's not without its ups and downs.

In order for it to work, we have to allow it to grow and change over time rather than being locked forever into what it was when we first started dating our person.

Keep ReadingShow less