Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

JD Vance Ripped For Saying It's 'Totally Reasonable' For Trump To Go After Biden In Second Term

JD Vance Ripped For Saying It's 'Totally Reasonable' For Trump To Go After Biden In Second Term

Ohio Senator J.D. Vance said it would be 'totally reasonable' for Donald Trump to open an investigation into Joe Biden in a second term after criticizing Biden for supposedly doing the same to Trump.

Make us preferred on Google

Ohio Republican Senator J.D. Vance was criticized after saying it would be "totally reasonable" for former President Donald Trump to open an investigation into President Joe Biden in the event Trump wins a second term.

Vance—who is widely considered a top choice to be Trump's running mate—justified this by claiming that Biden has “done exactly that for the last few years,” falsely accusing Biden of engaging in a “campaign of lawfare against his political opposition.”


Speaking on Sunday's episode of Meet the Press, Vance told moderator Kristen Welker that media outlets and Democrats have "lost their minds" over Trump's vow last month to "appoint a real special prosecutor to go after the most corrupt president in the history of the United States of America, Joe Biden."

His remarks came after Welker asked him the following question:

"If former President Trump were to win, if you were to be his vice president, would you support him appointing a special prosecutor to go after his political enemies, the Bidens?"

You can watch their exchange in the video below.

Vance replied:

Well, first of all, Kristen, I find it interesting how the media and the Democrats have lost their mind over this particular quote. Donald Trump is talking about appointing a special prosecutor to investigate Joe Biden for wrongdoing."
"Joe Biden has done exactly that for the last few years and has done far more in addition to that to engage in a campaign of lawfare against his political opposition."
"I think what Donald Trump is simply saying is that we ought to investigate the prior administration. There are obviously many instances of wrongdoing. The House Oversight Committee has identified a number of corrupt business transactions that may or may not be criminal that we have to find out."
"So I think Donald Trump's saying, 'Look, let's do the basic work of investigating wrongdoing.' It's a totally reasonable thing for him to do and frankly, the Biden administration has done far worse. So if you think that what Donald Trump is proposing is a threat to democracy, isn't what Joe Biden has done a massive threat to our laws and system of government?"

Welker then fact-checked Vance's statements by pointing to Trump's recent conviction in his hush money trial:

"Senator, just to be clear, Joe Biden didn't appoint a special prosecutor. The Attorney General did that. Trump was indicted by a grand jury, he was found guilty by a jury of his peers in New York, but can we just go back to the core question here?"
"Would you support him taking such an action? It sounds like yes, you would."

Vance persisted:

"I would absolutely support investigating prior wrongdoing by our government, absolutely. That's what you have to have in a system of law and order, Kristen."

Vance's statements are remarkable given that Trump recently became the first former president to be convicted of felony crimes. A New York jury in May found him guilty on all 34 counts of falsifying business records to conceal hush money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels to illegally influence the 2016 election.

Trump's sentencing was originally set for July 11 but has been pushed back to September 18 in the wake of a Supreme Court decision granting him sweeping immunity protections.

This week, the nation's highest court ruled that Trump may claim immunity from criminal prosecution for some of his actions during the final days of his presidency—particularly for his role before, during, and after the Capitol riot—a decision expected to further delay his federal trial on charges he attempted to overturn the 2020 election results.

Trump's legal team believes that this ruling might significantly undermine special counsel Jack Smith's case, arguing that any communications Trump had with then-Vice President Mike Pence or Department of Justice officials could now be considered official, thus inadmissible at trial.

The legal team also suggested that this decision could benefit Trump in the classified documents case, although initial interpretations may not necessarily dictate the outcome of that legal process.

All of this is a far cry from the "law and order" principles Vance espoused during the interview—and he was swiftly called out for supporting a convicted felon.


Vance's hypocrisy is all the more evident given that he recently revealed that Trump's campaign is asking potential vice presidential picks whether they've committed any "crime"—which is ironic because Trump himself would be disqualified on those parameters.

Vance previously secured Trump's endorsement during his Senate campaign and is considered one of Trump's strongest allies in Congress, openly supporting Trump's claim of absolute immunity.

Trump has reportedly been considering Vance as a potential vice-presidential candidate, with plans to announce his running mate before the Republican convention, which is scheduled to be held July 15 to 18, 2024, at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

More from News

Larry David
Michael Kovac/Getty Images for AFI

Larry David's New Satirical Essay Mocking Democratic Socialists Isn't Sitting Well With People

Seinfeld co-creator and Curb Your Enthusiasm star Larry David took aim at the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) in a new satirical essay for Air Mail. But rather than people finding humor in his latest effort at comedy, there have been a lot of "OK, Boomer" reactions to the 79-year-old David.

In his essay, David trots out a lot of the same rhetoric employed by MAGA Republicans in their attack ads, on social media, and in debates with Democratic candidates—even if they can't even define what socialism is.

Keep ReadingShow less
Meghan McCain; Susan Dell
Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for TIME; Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Meghan McCain Just Called Out MAGA Women With 'Mar-A-Lago Face' In A 'Spicy' Hot Take

Republican and former The View co-host Meghan McCain sparked a wave of commentary on X after she remarked on the so-called "Mar-a-Lago face" phenomenon.

“Mar-a-Lago face” is a term describing a cosmetic and fashion aesthetic associated with some conservative and Republican figures in the United States. The look typically combines cosmetic procedures, such as lip fillers, Botox, jaw contouring and cosmetic dental work, with spray tans, false eyelashes and dark, smoky eye makeup.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of JD Vance
C-SPAN

JD Vance Tries To Start MAGA Rally Speech While Music Is Still Blaring In Cringey Viral Video

Vice President JD Vance was widely mocked after attempting to speak over blaring music at a rally in Cincinnati, Ohio, to encourage voters to elect GOP candidates in the upcoming midterms.

Vance was expected to announce the results of a nationwide crackdown on SNAP fraud that reportedly identified more than 40 alleged perpetrators. However, he did not release the findings of his task force.

Keep ReadingShow less
'The Craft' cast, including Robin Tunney, Fairuza Balk, Rachel True and Neve Campbell
Columbia Pictures/Getty Images

'The Craft' Star Speaks Out After New Bratz Dolls Were Sent To Influencers But Not Original Cast

Bratz enthusiasts have a lot to be excited about right now, as a new collection of the dolls have rolled out, this time inspired specifically by the original cast of the 1996 horror film The Craft, from which Bratz dolls came to be.

But just because it's an exciting campaign doesn't mean it's perfect.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trick-or-treating
The Boston Globe/Getty Images

HOA Sparks Debate After Sending Letter Telling People Not To Hand Out Full-Size Candy Bars On Halloween

Within our communities, it's important to make everyone feel welcome and included, and sometimes that means making changes so that everyone can afford to be included. But sometimes changes are made simply because someone with the power to change it doesn't want to do something.

The question is whether changes are being made for inclusivity or convenience.

Keep ReadingShow less