Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Trump Is Now Insisting That The Border Wall Be Painted Black, Potentially Costing Tax Payers $500 Million

Trump Is Now Insisting That The Border Wall Be Painted Black, Potentially Costing Tax Payers $500 Million
Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images
Make us preferred on Google

President Donald Trump's pet project—his border wall—was a center point of his 2016 campaign.

His MAGA rallies featured chants of "build the wall" and promises that Mexico would pay for it.


Many of those 2016 campaign promises were not kept, but Trump remained adamant he get his 30 foot high wall—not a fence—no matter what. Trump ended up with bollard fencing—the design used by the previous administration after over $20 million was spent on wall prototypes that all failed in testing and proved to be as impractical as experts said they would be before the money was spent.

Mexico paid for neither the bollard fencing or the failed wall prototypes that the Trump administration eventually tore down and hauled away for another few million dollars.

Now Trump is demanding at least another $500 million be spent to paint his fence black according to The Washington Post.

The bollard fencing being used is already a dark color. The steel used has a 30-year service life and is weather resistant despite exposure to solar radiation and extreme temperature changes that occur in a desert environment. Painting it all black would increase the solar heat retention by less than 10 percent.

Pentagon and Department of Homeland Security officials believed they had talked the President out of the unnecessary paint job. With the majority of the funds for Trump's border fence being pulled from the Defense Department's budget cancelling numerous long awaited military construction projects like housing, schools and hospitals and security for United States' military bases in the USA and abroad, the Pentagon has been involved in the fencing contracts and project execution.

The original fencing plans left the black paint out of the project because experts from all departments deemed it unnecessary and a massive long term burden to maintain. While the unpainted fence would require no surface maintenance for 30 years, the painted fence would require almost constant costly touch ups.

An official involved in the border fence planning discussions said:

"POTUS has changed his mind and now wants the fence painted. We are modifying contracts to add."

Aides were reportedly told to seek input from North Dakota-based Fisher Sand and Gravel. Fisher S&G's $400 million contract to build a section of new fencing in Arizona is under review by the Department of Defense inspector general for violating federal contract award laws.

Painting estimates that federal contracting officials produced show costs ranging from $500 million for two coats of acrylic paint to more than $3 billion for a premium "powder coating" according to documents obtained by The Washington Post.

Trump has been talking about a black fence since 2018.

He believes only a black fence will work because of personal experience. The President shared a story about one of his golf clubs and a snack shop with a black granite countertop. When his group of golfing partners ordered food and drinks the countertop was so hot it momentarily burned their arms.

Because of this golf club hot dog stand, the President thinks the $500 million to $3 billion dollar black fence paint will make his fence impossible to climb despite experts telling him otherwise.

Rick Duncan, a materials engineer who works for trade associations and specializes in rooftop coatings said:

"It won't make much of a difference. There's no technical reason to paint it to make it hotter."

He also pointed out black paint will fade to pale grey in the sun and actually be less effective than the dark color that the bare metal already has, meaning a painted fence will need to be repainted often to ensure it isn't less effective.


Trump pulled about $15 billion for his pet project so far with two-thirds diverted from Defense Department construction funds and counternarcotics programs. Of the 1,954 miles of the US Mexico border, Customs and Border Patrol estimates the money will pay for only 731 miles of new barriers without any paint.

And going back to paint what is already done presents more challenges.

Ed Zarenski, a retired construction cost estimator in Massachusetts who worked on large public works projects told The Washington Post:

"Painting it before it's installed would be cheaper. Otherwise you'll have to run a bucket truck on both sides of the barrier."

This presents another issue as the fencing was placed with only a small strip of land on the Mexican side. Crews would either need permission from the government of Mexico to perform painting operations on Mexican soil or crew would have to use a specialized boom long enough to extend up and over the barrier from the United States' side.

When Trump had a section of new barrier in California painted black last year the cost was about $1 million per mile with United States military troops providing the labor. Paying workers to do the job would increase costs further.

The cheapest paint option would cost an additional $1.2 million per mile in labor costs for two coats of acrylic paint on top of the paint and equipment costs.

Other paint options range from an additional $4.5 million to $6.8 million per mile.

Just as the experts noted with Trump's promised border wall, no part of the painting plan is efficient, necessary or effective.

This shirt is available here.

Amazon

More from News

Screenshots from @nataliemeansnice's TikTok
@nataliemeansnice/TikTok

Mom Goes Viral After Realizing She Spent Halloween Event With White Lips After Hilarious Mix-Up

Halloween is meant to be all fun and games, but people say, "Trick or treat!" for a reason!

Mom and TikToker Natalie Drue, or @nataliemeansnice on the social media platform, went to a candy-free trunk-or-treat event with her 2-year-old daughter, where they toured a variety of trunks presented by local businesses, corporations, and members of the neighborhood.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ariana Grande
Taylor Hill/FilmMagic

Ariana Grande Caught Liking Instagram Post Hilariously Trolling Republicans After Midterms—And Fans Are Applauding

Most celebrities haven't had the gall to stand for anything since Trump took office, but in the wake of Tuesday's midterms some of them are showing exactly where they stand, even if in the subtlest of ways.

Case in point: Ariana Grande, who was caught liking an Instagram post that used one of her performances to hilariously troll Republicans, and fans are loving it.

Keep ReadingShow less
Katie Miller
CBS News

Katie Miller Reveals That She Didn't Actually Vote In The Midterms—And Her Reason Is Getting Major Side-Eye

Controversial Republican President Donald Trump's MAGA movement took a major hit in the midterms.

For some inexplicable reason, Bari Weiss' CBS News decided Katie Miller, the wife of Trump White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and the Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller, was the expert to consult on why Tuesday's results went so badly for her husband's boss and her husband's Project 2025 Christian nationalist, White supremacist agenda.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump
Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

Dems Share Important Reminder As Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Is Set To Take Effect In January

After Democrats swept midterm election races to win back both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate in a clear repudiation of the Trump administration, people are sharing reminders that President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" is set to take effect in January and that Americans could blame Democrats for stipulations Republicans put in the bill.

According to The Washington Post, the bill "includes the biggest reduction of funding for the federal safety net since at least the 1990s, targeting more than $1 trillion in social spending." The Post noted that the $3 trillion package "partially pays for its large price tag by slashing spending on Medicaid and food stamps (SNAP), which congressional Republicans maintain are rife with fraud."

Keep ReadingShow less
James Talarico; Ken Paxton
Sergio Flores/Getty Images; Adam Gray/Getty Images

Texas Election Results Reveal Just How Badly James Talarico Beat Ken Paxton—And We Love To See It

While election results in Texas have still not been fully tallied, the unofficial results have revealed that the election between Democrat James Talarico and Republican Ken Paxton in the race for the U.S. Senate was over before Election Day even hit because Talarico received more early votes than Paxton received in total.

The scale of Talarico’s victory was evident in the early-voting figures. He received 5,444,982 votes overall, including 4,397,474 cast before Election Day. Paxton, by comparison, finished with 4,249,373 votes, of which 3,232,667 were early ballots. In other words, Talarico secured nearly 150,000 more votes during early voting alone than Paxton received across the entire election.

Keep ReadingShow less