Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Who Knew Salmonella Might Be the Key to Fighting Cancer?

Who Knew Salmonella Might Be the Key to Fighting Cancer?
Credit: Rocky Mountain Laboratories,NIAID,NIH Color-enhanced scanning electron micrograph showing Salmonella typhimurium (red) invading cultured human cells.

Scientists are using Salmonella to attack cancer cells.

[DIGEST: Science, The Telegraph, Yale Scientific]

One of the reasons cancer is so hard to treat effectively is because the body doesn’t recognize the cancer cells as dangerous. Because the rogue cells aren’t foreign, the body’s immune system doesn’t activate, and the cells are left to multiply.


New research, reported in Science Translational Medicine, may change that.

Researchers at the Chonnam National University in Hwasun Hospital in Jeonnam, Korea injected a modified strain of the food poisoning bug Salmonella into tumors. The strain was engineered to be much less potent than the strain that causes food poisoning, but it was powerful enough to still be recognized by the immune system as a foreign invader. The researchers then “weaponized” the bacteria by genetically modifying it to secrete a protein known as FlaB.

The results have been compelling. In one set of experiments, biologists Jung-Joon Min and Joon Haeng Rhee injected the Salmonella into 20 mice with human colon cancers. After several days, the mice had cleared the bacteria from their organs, but not from the cancerous tumors. After four months, the tumors were undetectable in more than half of the mice, and they remained healthy throughout the experiment. Control mice infected with bacteria that did not secrete FlaB died from the cancer.

In a second set of experiments, the scientists transplanted human colon cancer cells into three different sets of mice: eight treated with FlaB-secreting Salmonella, six treated with non-FlaB secreting Salmonella, and seven left untreated. After four weeks, the mice treated with non-FlaB secreting Salmonella and the mice left untreated had dozens of metastases. Those treated with the FlaB-secreting Salmonella, however, had just four secondary tumors total, and several showed no signs of metastasis.

Joon Haeng Rhee, one of the researchers on the experiments and a professor of microbiology at Chonnam, said: “We believe that this was a kind of groundbreaking trial to turn tumor-helping immune cells, Dr. Jekyll, into tumor-killing ones, Mr. Hyde.”

To read more, please

Kevin Harrington, a professor of biological cancer therapies at The Institute of Cancer Research in London, noted that “until now, attempts to use bacteria as anti-cancer therapies have had limited success, both in the laboratory and in the clinic. The current work by [the scientists] represents a fascinating new approach to using bacteria. Instead of asking the bacteria to kill cancer cells directly, the researchers have genetically engineered salmonella so that it triggers the immune system to mount an attack on the tumor.”

The team plans to conduct further animal studies to refine the technique. They hope to run clinical trials on humans in the next few years.

Similar work using Salmonella to fight cancer has been done by a U.S. team based in San Diego. Here, the team used Salmonella to transport an anti-cancer chemical, Haemolysin E, to cancer cells. When combined with chemotherapy in mice, the animals had less tumor activity and a greater survival rate than those who received chemotherapy alone.

These experiments are creating momentum behind the use of bacterial therapy generally. “Bacteria can theoretically deliver any protein or molecule that they are capable of producing,” said Omar Din, a University of California, San Diego graduate student who performed the research. Paradoxically, this means bacteria could be highly effective at treating infections.

But for now, the most excitement is around cancer treatment, both because of its efficacy, and because of the quality of life it would afford patients. “We believe there is huge mileage in pursuing research into this type of treatment,” said Paul Dyson, a professor at Swansea University in England. “Existing evidence indicates there would be few or no side effects.”

More from News

Donald Trump holding photos of White House ballroom
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

CNN Just Used A Hilarious Poll To Show Just How Unpopular Trump's Ballroom Is—And We're Cackling

After President Donald Trump claimed that his new White House ballroom is "very popular" with the American public, CNN shared a hilariously shady poll that gets to the truth of the matter.

Last year, Trump ordered the demolition of the entire East Wing to make way for a 90,000 square-foot ballroom that will dwarf the size of the White House itself, sparking alarm from historical preservationists and the public alike.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @devynnehaddoxx's TikTok video
@devynnehaddoxx/TikTok

Woman In Labor Times How Long Her Husband Takes To Poop To See If She Can Push Their Baby Out Faster In Hilarious Viral Video

It's well-known across the internet that it takes forever for men to use the restroom. For dads especially, in the time it takes them to poop, when they return to the house, their kids will have aged seven years, and their baby will have learned to walk.

These are jokes, of course, but it's an internet consensus that men spend a really long time on the porcelain throne.

Keep ReadingShow less
David Letterman (left) has continued defending Stephen Colbert (right) as CBS faces backlash over canceling The Late Show.
Kevin Winter/Getty Images; Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images

David Letterman Rips 'Lying Weasels' At CBS For Claiming Colbert Was Canceled For Financial Reasons In Epic Takedown

David Letterman isn’t staying quiet about CBS canceling The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. As Colbert’s run comes to an end later this month, the former late-night host is publicly challenging the network’s claim that the decision was purely financial.

Letterman, who hosted The Late Show from 1993 until stepping down in 2015, addressed the controversy during a new interview with New York Times journalist Jason Zinoman.

Keep ReadingShow less
Antonia Eastwood; Gemma Monk
Antonia Eastwood/MSN; Cover Images

Woman Speaks Out After Prison Sentence To Reveal What Led Her To Hurl Black Paint At Sister-In-Law On Her Wedding Day

In early 2024, 49-year-old Antonia Eastwood married Ashley Monk after about five months of dating. During the ceremony, Antonia tripped while walking down the aisle.

Antonia and Ashley were both suspicious that she did not trip accidentally and that Ashley's sister, Gemma, actually tripped her. Gemma and Antonia were not close, and the couple also believed that Gemma might be jealous that they were marrying after five months, though she'd been with her childhood sweetheart for 20 years without tying the knot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Billie Eilish on 'Good Hang'
Good Hang with Amy Poehler/YouTube

Billie Eilish's Refreshingly Blunt Take On Aging And 'Botched' Plastic Surgery Has Fans Nodding Hard

You know what they say: the grass is greener on the other side. Most people want something that they don't have.

While many people right now are fixated on appearing younger than their age, Billie Eilish—who already looks younger than her age—is looking forward to what comes next.

Keep ReadingShow less