Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Space Junk Is Polluting Our Atmosphere, but China Thinks It May Have Found a Solution

Space Junk Is Polluting Our Atmosphere, but China Thinks It May Have Found a Solution
NASA.

An academic paper from China explains the viability of using lasers to break up small space debris in earth’s orbit. But some worry that the lasers could be used for military warfare.

Here on earth, litter and pollution are problems. But thanks to old satellites and other manmade contraptions, earth’s orbit is also littered with junk.

The magnitude of space junk is problematic for more than existential reasons. The high-speed junk is a “deadly cascade,” said experts at the European Space Agency, threatening future space missions and satellites already in orbit.


Because of how fast the debris travels, even the smallest pieces can pose grave threats to the International Space Station and active satellites. Research by Lockheed Martin in 2014 found that every day there were 200 threats to orbiting satellites. In 2015, crew members of the International Space Station had to evacuate their living quarters after an old satellite came close to a collision.

China is one of the main contributors to the problem. A 2007 anti-satellite test alone generated thousands of pieces of debris that entered into earth’s orbit, the worst fragmentation in 50 years of space operations. Now, China is hoping to fix the problem with giant lasers.

In a paper published in the scientific journal Optik, Chinese scientists at the Air Force Engineering University in China described a study in which they successfully simulated an orbiting laser station that would use bursts of light to zap pieces of space debris under 4 inches long. These “zaps”—20 bursts of light per second for two minutes—would burn up the junk or push it out of the way.

After conducting a simulation, the researchers concluded that this would be an effective way to clean Earth’s orbit: “It provides necessary theoretical basis for the deployment of space-based laser station and the further application of space debris removal by using space-based laser,” the abstract states.

While theoretically possible, there are still a number of impediments before space-junk-zapping-lasers can be deployed. The lasers are only able to break up very small pieces of space junk. It is unclear whether they would be able to move larger pieces of junk out of a collision course.

In addition, the logistics of building the lasers would be complicated. It is unclear who would build the lasers, or how many there would be.

They also raise the serious question of whether the lasers could be used as weapons, including to destroy orbiting U.S. satellites and stations. Last year, U.S. General John Hyten warned that China was building space weapons to “challenge the balance of world power.” “They’ve been building weapons, testing weapons, building weapons to operate from the earth in space, jamming weapons, laser weapons, and they have not kept it secret. They’re building those capabilities to challenge the United States of America, to challenge our allies…. We cannot allow that to happen.”

Whether the lasers will be used to destroy U.S. satellites, space junk, or remain a theoretical response to the growing space junk problem remains to be seen. But with thousands more satellites expected to enter the earth’s orbit by 2025, it is becoming increasingly clear that we need a solution.

More from News

Signal app logo; J.D. Vance
Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images; Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Signal's Founder Epically Roasts Vance Over The Disastrous Group Chat Debacle

Signal founder Matthew Rosenfeld, better known by the pseudonym Moxie Marlinspike, mocked Vice President J.D. Vance after the app found itself at the center of the Trump administration's group text scandal.

Rosenfeld's post came amid revelations that Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg was invited into a Signal chat with high-level Trump administration officials, particularly Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, discussing military strategy surrounding war strikes in Yemen.

Keep ReadingShow less
MTG, Martha Kelner
C-SPAN

MTG Blasted For Her Unhinged Reaction To A UK Reporter Asking Her A Question

Far right Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene was bashed for viciously shutting down a British reporter who had a question about the Signal group chat scandal, AKA "Signalgate."

Republican President Donald Trump's administration continues to downplay concerns after The Atlantic'seditor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, was mistakenly added to the Signal messaging app's group chat in which U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth shared with top intelligence officials the specific weapons programs regarding the U.S. war strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Rachel Maddow
MSNBC

Rachel Maddow Gives Trump A Blistering Reality Check After His 'Perfect' Presidency Claims

MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow criticized President Donald Trump after he claimed "we've had two perfect months" to start out his presidency—conveniently downplaying "Signalgate" and ignoring all the scandals that have thus far struck his administration.

You can see his comments to reporters in the video below:

Keep ReadingShow less
train crossing in small town
craig kerwien on Unsplash

People Share Their Most Embarrassing Small Town Stories

I lived most of my life in a very small town in Northern Maine. There were about 200 kids in my high school and there were 56 kids in my graduating class—we were tied with the class of 1961 for the largest class ever.

When the primary employer in town—Pinkham Lumber Mill—shut down, the town got even smaller. Now the senior class is considered large if it reaches double digits.

Keep ReadingShow less
A post-it with "I Quit" written on it over a computer keypad
a yellow notepad on a keyboard
Photo by Nick Fewings on Unsplash

People Reveal Why They Quit Their Job On The First Day

As much as anyone may want to quit a job, at the end of the day it's easier said than done.

For one thing, even if people are working soul-sucking jobs that barely cover expenses, they still can't afford to lose the paycheck, until something better comes along.

Keep ReadingShow less