Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

We Now Know How Much More Americans Are Paying in Taxes Every Month as a Result of Donald Trump's Trade War, and Yeah, It's a Lot

We Now Know How Much More Americans Are Paying in Taxes Every Month as a Result of Donald Trump's Trade War, and Yeah, It's a Lot
US President Donald Trump speaks during the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Maryland, on March 2, 2019. (Photo by Nicholas Kamm / AFP) (Photo credit should read NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images)

Wow.

In his unhinged two hour speech at CPAC on Saturday, President Donald Trump gushed over tariffs as "the greatest negotiating tool in the history of our country" as his administration struggles to strike a deal with China to end the trade war he ignited with tariffs last year.

Also over the weekend, however, two comprehensive studies were published that demolish the president's defense of tariffs - and the findings are grim.


Time Magazine noted on Monday:

"The studies are the most authoritative yet to document the negative effect of Trump’s tariffs on the U.S. economy, though others have shown the negative consequences."

Despite Trump's claims to the contrary, American taxpayers are picking up the tab.

Economists Mary Amiti, Stephen Redding, and David Weinstein at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Princeton University, and Columbia University found that American consumers are footing the bill for most of Trump's $250 billion tax penalty on Chinese imports, specifically products that use steel and aluminum.

And the price tag is steep. The economists' paper calculated that Trump's tariffs have resulted in $3 billion in additional taxes per month on consumers and $1.8 billion in additional losses to American businesses. A further $165 billion has been siphoned off from American trade, mainly due to a collapse in supply chains, the trio's study determined.

“This is kind of the worst-case scenario in terms of consumers," Weinstein said in an interview. “It’s pretty unclear that this trade war is a net win for the economy at this point." Weinstein added that additional research is being conducted to determine how much of a hit investment has taken because of uncertainty spurred by the president's trade war.

So much winning.

A second study yielded the same conclusions.

Pinelopi Goldberg, the World Bank’s chief economist, Pablo Fajgelbaum of UCLA, Patrick Kennedy of the University of California Berkeley, and Amit Khandelwal of Columbia University took their research one step further. They factored in what effects retaliatory tariffs - imposed by countries such as China, Germany, and Canada - have had on the American economy.

The increased costs of imports have robbed the economy of $68.8 billion, their study revealed. But, because of the revenue raised by tariffs and rising prices of domestically-produced goods, the overall loss was adjusted to $6.4 billion.

Still, farmers and manufacturing workers among Trump's political base are among the hardest hit, the study showed.

"Workers in very Republican counties bore the brunt of the costs of the trade war, in part because retaliations disproportionately targeted agricultural sectors, and in part because U.S. tariffs raised the costs of inputs used by these counties,’’ the authors wrote.

Additionally, the Institute of International Finance determined last week that retaliatory tariffs have shaved $40 billion off American exports.

Meanwhile, American taxpayers are now being forced to provide billions in bailouts to farmers who are no longer able to compete in the global market. Soy farmers have been among the hardest hit. One report released in November found soy exports to China have fallen 94 percent since the inception of Trump's trade war.

Farm forecasts issued late last year are, understandably, not terribly optimistic. Another study, published last month, warned that tariffs on foreign cars, which Trump has threatened to impose, would be disastrous.

Trump said at CPAC that he "found some very old laws from when our country was rich — really rich — the old tariff laws. We had to dust them off. You could hardly see, they were so dusty."

Now we know why.

More from People/donald-trump

dog and cat snuggling together
Krista Mangulsone on Unsplash

Times Pet Owners 'Severely Underestimated' Their Pets' Intelligence

I've lived with cats—because no one owns a feline—most of my life. Some have been very clever creatures while others were real dingbats.

Family members have owned dogs whose talents also ran the gamut.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scott Bessent
Meet the Press/NBC News

Scott Bessent Blasted Over His Bonkers Suggestion For How To Bring Your Own Inflation Rate Down

Continuing to follow the example of MAGA Republican President Donald Trump, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent appeared on Meet the Press Sunday to blame Democratic President Joe Biden for the financial downturn caused by Trump's tariff fiasco, then lied repeatedly about the state of the economy.

Meet the Press host Kristen Welker played a clip of MAGA Republican Vice President JD Vance telling a conservative audience at a Breitbart News event that Americans owe the Trump administration "a little bit of patience"—apparently while they figure out what tariffs are and how they work since they're rolling back more of them to lower consumer prices despite claiming Trump's tariffs don't affect consumer prices.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lindsay Lohan attends the men's final during day fifteen of the 2025 US Open Tennis Championships at USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center.
Elsa/Getty Images

Lindsay Lohan Is Now Sporting A New Accent—And Fans Aren't Sure What To Make Of It

In a twist freakier than a sequel to Freaky Friday, Lindsay Lohan has debuted yet another new accent—this time at the Fashion Trust Arabia Awards in Doha, Qatar.

Draped in a maroon, jewel-trimmed gown by The New Arrivals Ilkyaz Ozel and accompanied by her husband, Bader Shammas, and their 2-year-old son, Luai, the actress looked serene, elegant, and completely unbothered by the collective whiplash she was about to inflict on the internet.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jameela Jamil
Gilbert Flores/Variety/Getty Images

Jameela Jamil Speaks Out Against The Rise Of The 'Aesthetic Of Emaciation' Among Women In Hollywood

Content Warning: eating disorders, thinness as an aesthetic, emaciation in Hollywood

There's no denying that we've been gifted with some incredible music, television shows, and films this year.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump; Screenshot of Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker in "Rush Hour 2"
Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images; New Line Cinema

Trump Is Now Using His Presidential Sway To Pressure Studio Into Making 'Rush Hour 4'—And, Huh?

President Trump has reportedly pressured Paramount head Larry Ellison to make another sequel to Rush Hour, his favorite buddy-cop movie, as the company looks to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery.

The first Rush Hour film, starring Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker, was released in 1998, received positive reviews, and made $245 million worldwide. Chan and Tucker returned for two sequels released in 2001 and 2007 respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less