Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

John Roberts Smacks Down Trump For Threatening To Impeach Federal Judge Who Questioned Deportation Order

John Roberts; Donald Trump
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images (both)

After Donald Trump threatened to impeach Judge James Boasberg for questioning his recent deportation order of 250 Venezuelans, Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare rebuke of the President.

United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts finally spoke up on Tuesday to rebuke Republican President Donald Trump after he threatened a judge for ruling against the Trump administration's unconstitutional agenda.

On Tuesday morning, Trump took to Truth Social to rant about his latest court loss, targeting U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg with his vitriol, while not mentioning him by name.


The President—in the chaotic, grammatically inept style he's known for—wrote:

"This Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected President..."

Trump went on to toot his own horn:

"He didn’t WIN the popular VOTE (by a lot!), he didn’t WIN ALL SEVEN SWING STATES, he didn’t WIN 2,750 to 525 Counties, HE DIDN’T WIN ANYTHING!"
"I WON FOR MANY REASONS, IN AN OVERWHELMING MANDATE, BUT FIGHTING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION MAY HAVE BEEN THE NUMBER ONE REASON FOR THIS HISTORIC VICTORY."

Trump then blamed Judge Boasberg for upholding the Constitution despite his own oath to do the same.

Trump also made certain to include a MAGA shout-out at the end.

"I’m just doing what the VOTERS wanted me to do. This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!"
"WE DON’T WANT VICIOUS, VIOLENT, AND DEMENTED CRIMINALS, MANY OF THEM DERANGED MURDERERS, IN OUR COUNTRY."
"MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!"

@realDonaldTrump/Truth Social

But Trump's latest targeting of a federal official—for doing their job correctly—was a step too far for Chief Justice Roberts.

In an official statement, Justice Roberts said:

"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision."
"The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."
Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare statement today rebuking the fascist’s call for the impeachment of U.S. District Judge James Boasberg after the judge blocked the deportation of Venezuelan migrants using the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcn...

[image or embed]
— Po Murray (@pomurray.bsky.social) March 18, 2025 at 2:45 PM

Judge Boasberg on Saturday issued an order blocking deportation flights that Trump had ordered after invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 as their justification.

Trump tried to invoke this law to circumvent Constitutional protections and existing immigration and asylum laws. The 18th century act has been used only three times since it was passed by Congress in 1798, and then only during congressionally declared wars: the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II.

The Alien Enemies Act grants "wartime authority" for the President to "detain or deport natives and citizens of an enemy nation." It permits the President to target immigrants without hearings and based solely on their country of birth or country of citizenship.

People weren't buying what Trump and his administration were selling.

If the president attacks the judiciary for doing their job — THE PROBLEM IS THE PRESIDENT. 🔴 This is how democracy dies — when leaders think they’re above the law. SHARE if you stand with the rule of law! 🔥
— Jamie Richter (@arijojo.bsky.social) March 17, 2025 at 4:50 PM



@chefsilvia/Bluesky


He’s the whiniest bitch on the planet. Is there not a way for the Courts to partner up w the military to enforce these laws, since it is their oath to protect us from threat foreign and DOMESTIC?! Military tribunals? Anything?

[image or embed]
— Tiana <3 (@tianaadams.bsky.social) March 17, 2025 at 5:07 PM

But they weren't letting Roberts off the hook, either.

The Chief Justice was criticized for his past silence and for being complicit in Trump's misconduct.

When Donald Trump lawlessly went after ordinary Americans, Chief Justice John Roberts didn't care. But now that Trump is taking aim at Roberts' fellow judges, Roberts suddenly cares. It's always the same with conservatives, they don't care until something affects them.

[image or embed]
— Mrs. Betty Bowers (@mrsbettybowers.bsky.social) March 18, 2025 at 2:59 PM


John Roberts had TWO bites at the impeachment apple; the Senate may well have 86'd Trump, had the CJ taken the trials more seriously. THEN he granted Trump unlimited immunity. Only when Krasnov comes after judges, imperiling HIS OWN cushy job, does he suddenly rouse from his stupor. Fuck him.
— Greg Olear (@gregolear.bsky.social) March 18, 2025 at 2:47 PM


It’s also “not an appropriate response” to lacerate a judge because they have Mexican heritage or their daughter worked for a Democrat or they just didn’t rule in his favor. But Roberts was silent about all that.

[image or embed]
— Jon Cryer (@mrjoncryer.bsky.social) March 18, 2025 at 2:35 PM


Friendly reminder that the monster criticized by Chief Justice Roberts was created by Chief Justice Roberts.
— Andrea Junker (@strandjunker.com) March 18, 2025 at 2:10 PM


@cajunblue/Bluesky


Between yesterday's hearing about the deportation flights before Judge Boasberg, today's unhinged Trump post attacking him and Roberts's response, and the decision that just came out enjoining Musk and DOGE re USAID, we're about to find out just how big of a constitutional crisis we're in.
— Alan Rozenshtein (@alanrozenshtein.com) March 18, 2025 at 3:05 PM


Chief Justice John Roberts enters the FO stage of the FAFO cycle. "Look, when we said you could do whatever you wanted without consequences or judicial overview, we meant 'to other people.'"

[image or embed]
— That @mohu dude (@mohusseini.com) March 18, 2025 at 2:57 PM

As the SCOTUS' Chief Justice, Roberts is the highest member of the Judiciary branch of the federal government, while Trump is the highest member of the Executive branch.

The two, along with Congress as the Legislative branch, are designed to provide checks and balances on each others' power—something the Trump administration seems acutely ignorant of.

The Constitution grants the House of Representatives the power to impeach—as Trump should know after being impeached twice during his first term. Impeachment requires a simple House majority, which Republicans could achieve with their control of that chamber.

Trump's MAGA minions in the House already filed articles of impeachment against two other judges because of their rulings in Trump-related lawsuits, and today Rep. Brandon Gill did the same against Boasberg. The Constitution requires "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" for a valid impeachment.

Bruised egos because someone didn't get their way don't qualify, but that won't stop Trump's congressional acolytes from trying anyway.

But, like Trump's presidential impeachments, conviction and removal from office require a trial and a two-thirds supermajority vote in the Senate, where the split is 53 Republicans, 47 Democrats, and two independents—Maine's Angus King and Vermont's Bernie Sanders—who caucus with the Democrats.

Garnering an impeachment conviction requires 67 Senators—something Trump's personal vendetta is unlikely to ever achieve.

More from News/political-news

Car lights on a dark street
black car on road during night time
Photo by Christian Lue on Unsplash

The Scariest 'We Need To Leave, Now!' Experiences People Have Ever Had

We all have memories of a scary experience we would much rather not have in our memories.

Experiences such as horrific turbulence on a flight or waiting for a loved one in a life-or-death surgery, where there simply was no getting out of.

Keep ReadingShow less
A parking machine, with a care parallel parked on the street behind it.
black car parked on sidewalk during daytime

People Reveal The Secret Loopholes They Exploited Until They Finally Got Fixed

Who wouldn't take an easy route around an everyday inconvenience.

It's hard to imagine anyone would say no to anything that would save them time or money.

Keep ReadingShow less
JD Vance; Picture of Renee Nicole Good at vigil
Celai Gunes/Anadolu via Getty Images; Scott Olson/Getty Images

JD Vance Slammed After Baselessly Claiming Woman Killed By ICE In Minneapolis Was A 'Deranged Leftist'

Vice President JD Vance was criticized after he claimed without evidence that Renee Nicole Good—the woman fatally shot by an ICE agent in Minneapolis on Wednesday—was a "deranged leftist."

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin claimed Good “weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them.” But Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey pushed back against this narrative considering witnesses described seeing Good in the vehicle trying to flee officers when she was shot.

Keep ReadingShow less

People Break Down Which Careers Are A Total Relationship Turn-Off

Not every job is a desirable job to a romantic partner.

Even in this day and age, where people are scrambling to find any kind of job, potential romantic partners are compiling a 'not going to happen with me because of what you do list!'"

Keep ReadingShow less
Nicotine pouches now appearing in vending machines
John Keeble/Getty Images

Tech Companies Spark Backlash After Adding Nicotine Pouch Vending Machines As Office 'Perk'

More vacation time. More maternity, paternity, and sick leave. Walking paths and healthy snacks provided for free. Mental health break rooms and emotional support office dogs.

These are great examples of "office perks" that would encourage people to return to an in-office setting.

Keep ReadingShow less