Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

John Roberts Smacks Down Trump For Threatening To Impeach Federal Judge Who Questioned Deportation Order

John Roberts; Donald Trump
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images (both)

After Donald Trump threatened to impeach Judge James Boasberg for questioning his recent deportation order of 250 Venezuelans, Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare rebuke of the President.

United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts finally spoke up on Tuesday to rebuke Republican President Donald Trump after he threatened a judge for ruling against the Trump administration's unconstitutional agenda.

On Tuesday morning, Trump took to Truth Social to rant about his latest court loss, targeting U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg with his vitriol, while not mentioning him by name.


The President—in the chaotic, grammatically inept style he's known for—wrote:

"This Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected President..."

Trump went on to toot his own horn:

"He didn’t WIN the popular VOTE (by a lot!), he didn’t WIN ALL SEVEN SWING STATES, he didn’t WIN 2,750 to 525 Counties, HE DIDN’T WIN ANYTHING!"
"I WON FOR MANY REASONS, IN AN OVERWHELMING MANDATE, BUT FIGHTING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION MAY HAVE BEEN THE NUMBER ONE REASON FOR THIS HISTORIC VICTORY."

Trump then blamed Judge Boasberg for upholding the Constitution despite his own oath to do the same.

Trump also made certain to include a MAGA shout-out at the end.

"I’m just doing what the VOTERS wanted me to do. This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!"
"WE DON’T WANT VICIOUS, VIOLENT, AND DEMENTED CRIMINALS, MANY OF THEM DERANGED MURDERERS, IN OUR COUNTRY."
"MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!"

@realDonaldTrump/Truth Social

But Trump's latest targeting of a federal official—for doing their job correctly—was a step too far for Chief Justice Roberts.

In an official statement, Justice Roberts said:

"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision."
"The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."
Chief Justice John Roberts issued a rare statement today rebuking the fascist’s call for the impeachment of U.S. District Judge James Boasberg after the judge blocked the deportation of Venezuelan migrants using the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcn...

[image or embed]
— Po Murray (@pomurray.bsky.social) March 18, 2025 at 2:45 PM

Judge Boasberg on Saturday issued an order blocking deportation flights that Trump had ordered after invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 as their justification.

Trump tried to invoke this law to circumvent Constitutional protections and existing immigration and asylum laws. The 18th century act has been used only three times since it was passed by Congress in 1798, and then only during congressionally declared wars: the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II.

The Alien Enemies Act grants "wartime authority" for the President to "detain or deport natives and citizens of an enemy nation." It permits the President to target immigrants without hearings and based solely on their country of birth or country of citizenship.

People weren't buying what Trump and his administration were selling.

If the president attacks the judiciary for doing their job — THE PROBLEM IS THE PRESIDENT. 🔴 This is how democracy dies — when leaders think they’re above the law. SHARE if you stand with the rule of law! 🔥
— Jamie Richter (@arijojo.bsky.social) March 17, 2025 at 4:50 PM



@chefsilvia/Bluesky


He’s the whiniest bitch on the planet. Is there not a way for the Courts to partner up w the military to enforce these laws, since it is their oath to protect us from threat foreign and DOMESTIC?! Military tribunals? Anything?

[image or embed]
— Tiana <3 (@tianaadams.bsky.social) March 17, 2025 at 5:07 PM

But they weren't letting Roberts off the hook, either.

The Chief Justice was criticized for his past silence and for being complicit in Trump's misconduct.

When Donald Trump lawlessly went after ordinary Americans, Chief Justice John Roberts didn't care. But now that Trump is taking aim at Roberts' fellow judges, Roberts suddenly cares. It's always the same with conservatives, they don't care until something affects them.

[image or embed]
— Mrs. Betty Bowers (@mrsbettybowers.bsky.social) March 18, 2025 at 2:59 PM


John Roberts had TWO bites at the impeachment apple; the Senate may well have 86'd Trump, had the CJ taken the trials more seriously. THEN he granted Trump unlimited immunity. Only when Krasnov comes after judges, imperiling HIS OWN cushy job, does he suddenly rouse from his stupor. Fuck him.
— Greg Olear (@gregolear.bsky.social) March 18, 2025 at 2:47 PM


It’s also “not an appropriate response” to lacerate a judge because they have Mexican heritage or their daughter worked for a Democrat or they just didn’t rule in his favor. But Roberts was silent about all that.

[image or embed]
— Jon Cryer (@mrjoncryer.bsky.social) March 18, 2025 at 2:35 PM


Friendly reminder that the monster criticized by Chief Justice Roberts was created by Chief Justice Roberts.
— Andrea Junker (@strandjunker.com) March 18, 2025 at 2:10 PM


@cajunblue/Bluesky


Between yesterday's hearing about the deportation flights before Judge Boasberg, today's unhinged Trump post attacking him and Roberts's response, and the decision that just came out enjoining Musk and DOGE re USAID, we're about to find out just how big of a constitutional crisis we're in.
— Alan Rozenshtein (@alanrozenshtein.com) March 18, 2025 at 3:05 PM


Chief Justice John Roberts enters the FO stage of the FAFO cycle. "Look, when we said you could do whatever you wanted without consequences or judicial overview, we meant 'to other people.'"

[image or embed]
— That @mohu dude (@mohusseini.com) March 18, 2025 at 2:57 PM

As the SCOTUS' Chief Justice, Roberts is the highest member of the Judiciary branch of the federal government, while Trump is the highest member of the Executive branch.

The two, along with Congress as the Legislative branch, are designed to provide checks and balances on each others' power—something the Trump administration seems acutely ignorant of.

The Constitution grants the House of Representatives the power to impeach—as Trump should know after being impeached twice during his first term. Impeachment requires a simple House majority, which Republicans could achieve with their control of that chamber.

Trump's MAGA minions in the House already filed articles of impeachment against two other judges because of their rulings in Trump-related lawsuits, and today Rep. Brandon Gill did the same against Boasberg. The Constitution requires "Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors" for a valid impeachment.

Bruised egos because someone didn't get their way don't qualify, but that won't stop Trump's congressional acolytes from trying anyway.

But, like Trump's presidential impeachments, conviction and removal from office require a trial and a two-thirds supermajority vote in the Senate, where the split is 53 Republicans, 47 Democrats, and two independents—Maine's Angus King and Vermont's Bernie Sanders—who caucus with the Democrats.

Garnering an impeachment conviction requires 67 Senators—something Trump's personal vendetta is unlikely to ever achieve.

More from News/political-news

Screenshot of Erika Kirk and Caleb Chilcutt
Turning Point USA

Erika Kirk Has Ultimate Freudian Slip While Honoring Student With 'Charlie Kirk Courage Award'

Erika Kirk was mocked online after she had an epic Freudian slip while honoring Utah Valley University student Caleb Chilcutt with the Charlie Kirk Courage Award at Turning Point USA's AmericaFest over the weekend and misspoke while comparing Chilcutt to her late husband, far-right activist Charlie Kirk.

The late Kirk, who was assassinated at UVU in September, was a virulent white supremacist who aligned with the Christian right and advocated for Christian nationalism, promoting a nativist, fundamentalist Christian view of society. All the while, he openly attacked LGBTQ+ rights, backed the white genocide conspiracy theory, and was a major figure in the MAGA movement.

Keep ReadingShow less
Elon Musk; Sydney Sweeney
ALLISON ROBBERT/AFP via Getty Images; Jon Kopaloff/Getty Images for Lionsgate

Elon Musk Slammed After He Makes Gross And Juvenile Comment About Sydney Sweeney's Body

Why can't he just continue to fail to make rockets and self-driving electric cars?

Instead, tech billionaire Elon Musk has recently drawn criticism after posting remarks about actress Sydney Sweeney’s appearance following the Los Angeles premiere of The Housemaid. The controversy centers on Musk’s comments about Sweeney’s dress, comments that were seen by many online as focusing on her physical attributes rather than her work.

Keep ReadingShow less
Sam Altman speaking into a microphone with an American Flag in the background.
Andrew Harnik / Staff/Getty Images

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Just Shared An AI Image Of Himself As A Ripped Firefighter—And Was Promptly Roasted

To say that the rise of artificial intelligence, or AI for short, is a contentious issue would be a gross understatement.

In addition to the growing concern that AI will create job scarcity in almost every profession, recent studies have shown AI continues to leave a devastating carbon footprint. Its water usage alone surpassed the entirety of bottled water worldwide.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Thomas Massie; Pam Bondi
CBS; Win McNamee/Getty Images

GOP Rep. Thomas Massie Threatens To Impeach Pam Bondi Over Heavily-Redacted Epstein Files

Kentucky Republican Representative Thomas Massie announced that he's launched an impeachment investigation into Attorney General Pam Bondi following the release of several heavily-redacted files related to the late financier, pedophile, and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

Massie and California Democratic Representative Ro Khanna, sponsors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act signed by President Donald Trump on November 19, say the Justice Department has failed to comply with the law by missing the December 19 release deadline and providing documents that are heavily redacted and incomplete.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jack Black and Paul Rudd discussing Elle Fanning's comments
@efanningmedia/X

Jack Black's Reaction To Elle Fanning Calling Him 'Sex On Legs' Is Hilariously On Brand

Crush alert! Turns out Elle Fanning has kinda got it bad for none other than Jack Black. Hey, everyone is someone's type!

It all began when Fanning took part in Vanity Fair's popular lie detector test video series, during which Fanning was forced to confess her undying attraction to Black.

Keep ReadingShow less