Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Historian Warns Democrats Why Replacing Biden Now Would Be A 'Huge Mistake'

Screenshot of Abby Phillip and Allan Lichtman
CNN

Allan Lichtman, who has correctly predicted 9 of the last 10 presidential elections, gave a stark warning on CNN about why replacing Biden as the Democratic presidential nominee is 'foolhardy nonsense.'

Historian Allan Lichtman, a professor at American University renowned for accurately predicting nine out of the last ten presidential elections, warned on Saturday that replacing President Joe Biden could jeopardize the Democrats' chances in the 2024 election.

During an appearance on CNN, Lichtman dismissed the increasing calls from political pundits and Democratic activists for the 81-year-old Biden to step aside following his poor debate performance last week against former President Donald Trump, reigniting concerns about Biden’s age and his capability to serve a second term.


Lichtman, who has accurately forecast nearly every election outcome over the past fifty years except for the 2000 race, utilizes a system of 13 historical factors or "keys." This model incorporates four political factors, seven performance-related elements, and two aspects of a candidate's personality. According to Lichtman, if the incumbent party loses six of these "keys," they are likely to lose the presidency.

The keys assess factors such as whether a candidate is the sitting president, the economic conditions, and the presence of third-party candidates.

Lichtman emphasized that debate performance is not included in these determinants. He referenced historical cases, like the 1984 election where Ronald Reagan won 49 states despite underwhelming debate performances and concerns about his age.

You can hear what he said in the video below.

Lichtman said:

"All of these pundits, pollsters, analysts that you see on all the cable channels and all of these panels have no track record predicting elections. Either they come on and they claim they know how this debate is going to affect the outcome of elections."
"They have no idea. It's talk radio. It may be entertaining but there's no scientific basis."
"[The impact of the recent presidential debate is] Zero. Debates are not predictive of outcomes. Hillary Clinton won all three debates and still lost. John Kerry won all the debates, still lost. Barack Obama got trounced, 72% to 20% in the polls, worse than Biden and went on to win."
"That's why we rely on the 13 keys that tap into the structure of how elections really work and they show that Democrats' really only chance to win, contrary to everything you've heard, is with Biden running. Look at the incumbency key: Biden checks that off. The contest key: he checks that off. It was uncontested."
"It takes six keys to count out the White House, which means of the remaining 11 keys, six would have to fall. If Biden doesn't run, they lose the contest key, they lose the incumbency key, and only four more keys would have to fall."

To that, CNN anchor Abby Phillip replied:

"I think that's what I was trying to get at here. The problem right now is that the Democratic Party is considering replacing Biden mostly because physically it's unclear if he can carry out the rest of this campaign and put up a fight against his opponent. So that seems like a fundamentally different thing than the items you have in your rubric."

Lichtman responded:

“It’s a huge mistake. They're not doctors. They don't know whether Biden is physically capable of carrying out a second term or not. A lot of people were saying the same thing about Ronald Reagan, who was 73 and age was very different then and they said, 'He's not capable of running another term. [Yet] He won 49 states."
"This is all foolhardy nonsense. The same pundits and pollsters who led us down the primrose path in 2016 are giving Democrats horrible advice. This proves what I've been saying for years: Republicans have no principles, Democrats have no spine."
Republicans are sticking with a blatant liar who lied for every 1 minute and 20 seconds of that debate. By the way, lies stick. Debate performances can be overcome and at the first sign of adversity, the spineless Democrats want to throw under the bus, their own incumbent president. My goodness.”

Many agreed with Lichtman's assessment.


Biden's family has urged him to disregard suggestions to step aside following his poor debate performance against Trump. He spent Sunday at a presidential retreat with family members who encouraged him to stay in the race, according to CBS News.

A CBS News/YouGov poll released on Sunday revealed that 72% of registered Democratic voters believe the president lacks the mental and cognitive health to serve as president, with nearly half suggesting he should step aside. However, his campaign team and family maintain that he is the party's best chance to defeat Trump.

First Lady Dr. Jill Biden, speaking to Vogue from Camp David, said they “will not let those 90 minutes define the four years he’s been president." She emphasized their commitment to his campaign and noted that her husband “will always do what’s best for the country.”

More from News/2024-election

dog and cat snuggling together
Krista Mangulsone on Unsplash

Times Pet Owners 'Severely Underestimated' Their Pets' Intelligence

I've lived with cats—because no one owns a feline—most of my life. Some have been very clever creatures while others were real dingbats.

Family members have owned dogs whose talents also ran the gamut.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scott Bessent
Meet the Press/NBC News

Scott Bessent Blasted Over His Bonkers Suggestion For How To Bring Your Own Inflation Rate Down

Continuing to follow the example of MAGA Republican President Donald Trump, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent appeared on Meet the Press Sunday to blame Democratic President Joe Biden for the financial downturn caused by Trump's tariff fiasco, then lied repeatedly about the state of the economy.

Meet the Press host Kristen Welker played a clip of MAGA Republican Vice President JD Vance telling a conservative audience at a Breitbart News event that Americans owe the Trump administration "a little bit of patience"—apparently while they figure out what tariffs are and how they work since they're rolling back more of them to lower consumer prices despite claiming Trump's tariffs don't affect consumer prices.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lindsay Lohan attends the men's final during day fifteen of the 2025 US Open Tennis Championships at USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center.
Elsa/Getty Images

Lindsay Lohan Is Now Sporting A New Accent—And Fans Aren't Sure What To Make Of It

In a twist freakier than a sequel to Freaky Friday, Lindsay Lohan has debuted yet another new accent—this time at the Fashion Trust Arabia Awards in Doha, Qatar.

Draped in a maroon, jewel-trimmed gown by The New Arrivals Ilkyaz Ozel and accompanied by her husband, Bader Shammas, and their 2-year-old son, Luai, the actress looked serene, elegant, and completely unbothered by the collective whiplash she was about to inflict on the internet.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jameela Jamil
Gilbert Flores/Variety/Getty Images

Jameela Jamil Speaks Out Against The Rise Of The 'Aesthetic Of Emaciation' Among Women In Hollywood

Content Warning: eating disorders, thinness as an aesthetic, emaciation in Hollywood

There's no denying that we've been gifted with some incredible music, television shows, and films this year.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump; Screenshot of Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker in "Rush Hour 2"
Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images; New Line Cinema

Trump Is Now Using His Presidential Sway To Pressure Studio Into Making 'Rush Hour 4'—And, Huh?

President Trump has reportedly pressured Paramount head Larry Ellison to make another sequel to Rush Hour, his favorite buddy-cop movie, as the company looks to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery.

The first Rush Hour film, starring Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker, was released in 1998, received positive reviews, and made $245 million worldwide. Chan and Tucker returned for two sequels released in 2001 and 2007 respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less