Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Colbert Hilariously Loses It After Hegseth Tries To Throw Atlantic Journalist Under The Bus Over War Plans Group Chat

Stephen Colbert and Pete Hegseth
@colbertlateshow/Threads; LiveNOW from Fox/YouTube

Stephen Colbert raised his voice to ask Pete Hegseth the most obvious question after he tried to demonize Jeffrey Goldberg over Signal group chat revelations.

Make us preferred on Google

Amid revelations that Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg was invited into a Signal chat with high-level Trump administration officials, particularly Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, discussing military strategy surrounding their war strikes in Yemen, talk show host Stephen Colbert angrily called out Hegseth for demonizing Goldberg once the scandal broke.

Instead of providing an explanation or apology, Hegseth went on the offensive, criticizing Goldberg as "deceitful and highly discredited" and dismissing him as "a guy that peddles in garbage."


Colbert proceeded to accuse Hegseth and his colleagues of incompetence so profound that they've "tried every kind of spin they can think of," adding:

"The only reason we know that they were doing any of this is because they accidentally included a journalist! What else are these 'merit-based hires posting on? What're they doing?
"Where else? For all we know for just $4.99 a month you might see the launch codes on OnlyFans."

And after showing a clip of Hegseth attacking Goldberg, Colbert asked the burning question:

"Then why. Was he. On the war planning. Group chat. Why. Was he in. The chat! 'This guy's an idiot and everyone hates him.' You're the guys who put him in the chat!"
"You did! 'He's a moron'? Okay then! Don't put him! In the secret chat! If he's a bad guy! Why's he in the chat?!"

You can hear what he said in the video below.

You can watch his full segment below.

Many concurred with Colbert's assessment.

During a Senate hearing on Tuesday, intelligence officials from the Trump administration denied that the Signal chat contained classified information.

When questioned by Democratic Senator Martin Heinrich about whether the conversation included details on "weapons packages, targets, or timing," both former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe and current DNI Tulsi Gabbard stated they were unaware of such content, with Gabbard deferring to the Department of Defense.

The Atlantic reported that it had reached out to Trump administration officials and the White House regarding the publication of the messages, given their denial that the chat contained classified material or "war plans." While most did not respond, Trump spokesperson Karoline Leavitt objected to the release but maintained that "no classified information was transmitted in the group chat."

More from News/political-news

Katie Miller
CBS News

Katie Miller Reveals That She Didn't Actually Vote In The Midterms—And Her Reason Is Getting Major Side-Eye

Controversial Republican President Donald Trump's MAGA movement took a major hit in the midterms.

For some inexplicable reason, Bari Weiss' CBS News decided Katie Miller, the wife of Trump White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and the Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller, was the expert to consult on why Tuesday's results went so badly for her husband's boss and her husband's Project 2025 Christian nationalist, White supremacist agenda.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump
Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

Dems Share Important Reminder As Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Is Set To Take Effect In January

After Democrats swept midterm election races to win back both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate in a clear repudiation of the Trump administration, people are sharing reminders that President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" is set to take effect in January and that Americans could blame Democrats for stipulations Republicans put in the bill.

According to The Washington Post, the bill "includes the biggest reduction of funding for the federal safety net since at least the 1990s, targeting more than $1 trillion in social spending." The Post noted that the $3 trillion package "partially pays for its large price tag by slashing spending on Medicaid and food stamps (SNAP), which congressional Republicans maintain are rife with fraud."

Keep ReadingShow less
James Talarico; Ken Paxton
Sergio Flores/Getty Images; Adam Gray/Getty Images

Texas Election Results Reveal Just How Badly James Talarico Beat Ken Paxton—And We Love To See It

While election results in Texas have still not been fully tallied, the unofficial results have revealed that the election between Democrat James Talarico and Republican Ken Paxton in the race for the U.S. Senate was over before Election Day even hit because Talarico received more early votes than Paxton received in total.

The scale of Talarico’s victory was evident in the early-voting figures. He received 5,444,982 votes overall, including 4,397,474 cast before Election Day. Paxton, by comparison, finished with 4,249,373 votes, of which 3,232,667 were early ballots. In other words, Talarico secured nearly 150,000 more votes during early voting alone than Paxton received across the entire election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Abdul El-Sayed; Mike Rogers
Salwan Georges/Getty Images; Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Abdul El-Sayed Goes Viral After His Election Prediction From May Was Eerily Accurate

After his historic defeat of Michigan Republican Mike Rogers in the state's U.S. Senate race, Democratic Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed reshared a tweet of his from May in which he correctly predicted he'd "smoke" Rogers "by 7 points."

On May 3, El-Sayed published the following message on X predicting how his race against Rogers would turn out after polling supposedly showed Rogers ahead by several points:

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Jesse Watters
Fox News

Jesse Watters Has Complete Meltdown After Republicans Lose The Midterms—And We're Grabbing The Popcorn

Fox News host Jesse Watters expressed sheer disbelief after Democrats swept midterm election races to win back both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate in a clear repudiation of the Trump administration.

A Trump advisor told CNN that the election results were "essentially too big to rig." President Donald Trump has said he accepts the results and even acknowledged that his widely unpopular war in Iran played a significant role in pushing Americans to vote for Democrats. Affordability concerns, chief among them the price of gas, also contributed to the backlash Republicans experienced at the voting booth.

Keep ReadingShow less