Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

'Moms For Liberty' Group Now Claims Teaching About MLK Causes 'Emotional Trauma' In Kids

'Moms For Liberty' Group Now Claims Teaching About MLK Causes 'Emotional Trauma' In Kids
Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images

The right-wing's obsession with Critical Race Theory reached a new low this week when a Tennessee chapter of far-right activist group Moms For Liberty claimed teaching children about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. causes "emotional trauma" in kids.

As uncovered by journalist Judd Legum, the group went so far as to file a formal complaint with the Tennessee Department of Education, asking it to ban content pertaining to King's March on Washington, claiming the subject matter violates the state's ban on teaching Critical Race Theory in schools.


Critical Race Theory is a post-graduate-level academic discipline first developed in 1989 which examines how racism functions in government and public administration. It has little to do with Martin Luther King Jr. or Ruby Bridges, and is not taught in elementary schools.

The right-wing, however, has redefined CRT as simply a synonym for talking about racism or anything that might make White people uncomfortable at all and has used this propaganda to drive more conservative voters to the polls in recent elections for both candidates and legislation who are against their erroneous definition of CRT, including in Tennessee.

Moms for Liberty also demanded Frances Ruffin's book Martin Luther King Jr. and the March on Washington be banned, along with Ruby Bridges Goes to School: My True Story by Ruby Bridges, one of the first Black children to attend a previously segregated public school in 1960.

The group claims Bridges' book's photographs of "White firemen blasting Black children to the point of 'bruising their bodies and ripping off their clothes'" and showing segregated drinking fountains traumatizes children.

Without providing any evidence, the group went on to claim Bridges' book was driving some children into therapy.

"Some children are seeing counselors to overcome the emotional trauma inflicted upon them by what they learned in Tennessee public education."
"Targeting elementary age children with daily lessons on fighting past injustices as if they were occurring in present day violates Tennessee law and will sow the seeds of racial strife."

Such histrionic claims, submitted without evidence, is par for the course for the Williamson County chapter of Moms for Liberty.

Earlier this year, the group had a meltdown over a "sexy" children's science book that discussed how sea horses mate, doxxed two teenage girls for sharing a peck on a Homecoming float and claimed teaching about racism causes obsessive-compulsive disorder.

The group's New Hampshire chapter also placed a "bounty" on teachers who teach about racism.

You know, because liberty.

On Twitter people found the very idea of a group called "Moms for Liberty" banning the teaching of basic historical facts patently absurd—not to mention disturbing.











The Tennessee Department of Education tossed out Moms for Liberty's complaint, but only on a technicality based on the fact none of the books it mentions have been taught in the current school year.

The group will be free to lodge a similar complaint should the books be taught in the future.

More from Trending

Kate Gosselin
Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images

Kate Gosselin Shares The 'Lasting Effects' Of Having Sextuplets On Her Body—And We Can Only Imagine

TLC programming was a major part of Millennial and Gen-X culture, particularly shows like Teen Mom, Catfish, Jon & Kate Plus 8, and Keeping Up with the Kardashians.

If you were ever curious for a closer glimpse of Kate Gosselin, mother of twins and then sextuplets, and her life, now is your chance!

Keep ReadingShow less
screenshot of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris presidential debate
CNN

Video Of Kamala Warning Trump About Putin's Agenda Goes Viral After Russian Drones Enter Polish Airspace

One year ago, pundits and the press were analyzing the performances of Democratic presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris and former President and MAGA Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in the first and only debate between the pair before the 2024 presidential election.

During that face-off, it was noted that Trump refused to answer if he wanted United States ally Ukraine to win the war Russia began by invading their neighbor.

Keep ReadingShow less
An 87-year-old Gramercy Park man and his wife fought off a pair of watch thieves in a scam gone wrong.
Eyewitness News ABC7NY/YouTube

87-Year-Old Foils Watch Thieves

Who needs another season of Mr. and Mrs. Smith when Gramercy Park’s own Larry Schwartz and Joanna Cuccia are already serving action-comedy gold? At 87, Schwartz casually knocks out 240 reps a day and chases off watch thieves as if it were just another warm-up set.

And Larry Schwartz wasn’t about to let some Rolex-swapping grifter make him the punchline of a TikTok crime wave.

Keep ReadingShow less
Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic
Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images; 20th Century Fox

Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic

If you've ever wondered if legendary Vogue Editor-in-Chief Anna Wintour has ever seen The Devil Wears Prada, the answer is yes, and she's finally shared her opinions on the film.

The movie, based on Lauren Weisberger's novel of the same name, centers around the trials and tribulations a young writer endures under a legendarily icy fashion editor named Miranda Priestley.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Colbert, and crowd giving standing ovation
CBS

Powerful Line From Sotomayor's Scathing Dissent After ICE Ruling Ignites Standing Ovation On 'Colbert'

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor received a standing ovation during her appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert after Colbert read a line from her powerful dissent following the Court's ruling that immigration agents can use racial profiling when conducting arrests.

The case was brought by several individuals detained during ICE raids. A federal district judge initially found the raids unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Keep ReadingShow less