Katie Miller met her husband, Stephen Miller, while both were working in the first Trump administration. They married in 2020 and are now expecting their fourth child.
Stephen Miller served as both a senior advisor to the president for policy and White House director of speechwriting during Trump's first presidency and now holds the titles deputy chief of staff for policy and Homeland Security adviser.
As the architect of Trump's openly xenophobic and racist immigration moves, as well as a contributor to the right-wing Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, Stephen Miller is a popular white nationalist figure and is thought to be the mind behind most of Trump's anti-immigrant, anti-women, anti-LGBTQ+, anti-BIPOC intelligible words and actions.
His wife apparently finds all of this attractive.
What Katie Miller doesn't find attractive are access to birth control, reproductive freedom, universal healthcare, universal childcare, affordable housing, and equal rights for women, racial, ethnic and religious minorities, and the LGBTQ+ community—all ideals espoused by progressive liberals.
For Katie Miller, it's Zohran Mamdani ick, Stephen Miller yum. And for two or more consenting adults, whatever trips their trigger is fine.
But Katie Miller really stepped in it when she declared what she finds unattractive to be a universal truth with just her own preference—Stephen Miller—and a graph about who is and isn't choosing to have children as proof.
Last Wednesday, Katie Miller reposted a graph based on data gleaned from the NORC (formerly called the National Opinion Research Center) at the University of Chicago's General Social Survey (GSS) by a right-wing X user with <15k followers.

Which is still about 4-5 times more than the 3,000-4,000 people that tune into Katie Miller's podcast.
On a repost of the graph "Charlie Smirkley" titled "Childless Rate by Political Ideology," Katie Miller quipped:
"Liberal men aren’t attractive."

The responses were pretty brutal.


The ratio in the comments was almost entirely unkind towards Katie and her husband.
NORC at the University of Chicago's GSS data is all self-reported and may differ greatly from real birth rates, which are also not indicative of rates of sexual activity or fertility.
Conflating self-reported fatherhood rates to actual birth rates is a big leap that ignores dishonesty, infertility, sex acts that can't lead to pregnancy, and birth control usage.
Conflating self-reported fatherhood to attractiveness is a chasm that ignores many more mitigating factors.
But the internet mainly focused on Katie Miller's credentials when it came to judging attractiveness, which is strictly subjective.

















@Coste1Costello/X
reply to @nypost/Instagram
@krusti_nome/X
reply to @nypost/Instagram
reply to @nypost/Instagram
reply to @nypost/Instagram
reply to @nypost/Instagram
reply to @nypost/Instagram
reply to @nypost/Instagram
reply to @nypost/Instagram
reply to @nypost/Instagram