Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Republican Senators Are Now Trying To Take Credit For The Boost In Unemployment Benefits That They Actively Voted Against

Republican Senators Are Now Trying To Take Credit For The Boost In Unemployment Benefits That They Actively Voted Against
Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via Getty Images

Politics and sausage--you're not supposed to see either get made. The vast difference between Republicans' attitude toward new unemployment benefits before the passage of a recent relief bill and after proves the saying.


The $2.2 trillion economic relief package passed by the U.S. Senate on March 28, among other measures, ensures that all unemployed Americans, for the next four months, will receive not only their state's unemployment checks as they always would have, but now an additional $600 per week boost from the federal government.

A week ago, when the bill was still un-passed and on the Senate floor for debate, some Republicans HATED that idea.

But now those very Republicans are cashing in on the good optics, touting what a wonderful thing they've done for struggling Americans.

Giphy

Take Steve Daines, Senator from Montana. That guy pulled the flip-flop in plain sight.

During the bill's debate session, Daines was one of a few senators to support an amendment to those unemployment benefits.

The amendment, which did not go through despite all but two Senate Republicans voting for it, called for a limit on the federal boost to unemployment relief to ensure that nobody would make more than they would have if still working their old job.

Sen. Ben Sasse, of Nebraska and Lindsey Graham, of South Carolina were the primary champions of the amendment. They described their logic:

"This bill, as currently drafted, creates a perverse incentive for men and women who are sidelined to then not leave the sidelines to come back to work."

That, of course, assumes that the whole virus shutdown ends by early July.

Upon supporting the amendment and catching some flack at the time, Daines' spokesperson laid out his position.

"The senator did not think that unemployment insurance should pay more than the job a person lost."

Giphy

Nevertheless, exercising some remarkably efficient short-term memory destruction, Daines appeared on a local television program in his home state of Montana to boast about the good work they've been up to, Huffington Post reports.

"This package that we passed will provide $600 a week on top of the Montana benefit if you're unemployed."
"That's very significant. It more than doubles what the state of Montana pays. That's taking care of those Montanans who've lost their jobs."

And Daines is not the only one.

Senator John Cornyn, a Republican from Texas, penned an enthusiastic op-ed in the Dallas Morning News.

"It also expands unemployment insurance eligibility, and provides an extra $600 a week in federal unemployment benefits. When it comes to covering bills and navigating this uncertainly, that money is a lifeline."

Suddenly, what was once a gross incentive to not work is now a "lifeline."

Twitter was not easily duped.



The internet remembers. Will these Senators' constituents remember too?

More from Trending

Donald Trump holding photos of White House ballroom
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

CNN Just Used A Hilarious Poll To Show Just How Unpopular Trump's Ballroom Is—And We're Cackling

After President Donald Trump claimed that his new White House ballroom is "very popular" with the American public, CNN shared a hilariously shady poll that gets to the truth of the matter.

Last year, Trump ordered the demolition of the entire East Wing to make way for a 90,000 square-foot ballroom that will dwarf the size of the White House itself, sparking alarm from historical preservationists and the public alike.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @devynnehaddoxx's TikTok video
@devynnehaddoxx/TikTok

Woman In Labor Times How Long Her Husband Takes To Poop To See If She Can Push Their Baby Out Faster In Hilarious Viral Video

It's well-known across the internet that it takes forever for men to use the restroom. For dads especially, in the time it takes them to poop, when they return to the house, their kids will have aged seven years, and their baby will have learned to walk.

These are jokes, of course, but it's an internet consensus that men spend a really long time on the porcelain throne.

Keep ReadingShow less
David Letterman (left) has continued defending Stephen Colbert (right) as CBS faces backlash over canceling The Late Show.
Kevin Winter/Getty Images; Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images

David Letterman Rips 'Lying Weasels' At CBS For Claiming Colbert Was Canceled For Financial Reasons In Epic Takedown

David Letterman isn’t staying quiet about CBS canceling The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. As Colbert’s run comes to an end later this month, the former late-night host is publicly challenging the network’s claim that the decision was purely financial.

Letterman, who hosted The Late Show from 1993 until stepping down in 2015, addressed the controversy during a new interview with New York Times journalist Jason Zinoman.

Keep ReadingShow less
Billie Eilish on 'Good Hang'
Good Hang with Amy Poehler/YouTube

Billie Eilish's Refreshingly Blunt Take On Aging And 'Botched' Plastic Surgery Has Fans Nodding Hard

You know what they say: the grass is greener on the other side. Most people want something that they don't have.

While many people right now are fixated on appearing younger than their age, Billie Eilish—who already looks younger than her age—is looking forward to what comes next.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @archerhayesofficial's TikTok video
@archerhayesofficial/TikTok

Guy Films As Couple Delays Flight By An Hour After They Refused To Sit Apart From Each Other

TikToker Archer Hayes was ready to fly incognito with a baseball cap pulled down low, sunglasses, and his hoodie pulled up and tied around his face, ready to relax in the window seat.

Instead, Hayes recorded an entitled couple who delayed the flight by more than an hour—all because they were not seated together.

Keep ReadingShow less