Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Republican Senators Are Now Trying To Take Credit For The Boost In Unemployment Benefits That They Actively Voted Against

Republican Senators Are Now Trying To Take Credit For The Boost In Unemployment Benefits That They Actively Voted Against
Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via Getty Images

Politics and sausage--you're not supposed to see either get made. The vast difference between Republicans' attitude toward new unemployment benefits before the passage of a recent relief bill and after proves the saying.


The $2.2 trillion economic relief package passed by the U.S. Senate on March 28, among other measures, ensures that all unemployed Americans, for the next four months, will receive not only their state's unemployment checks as they always would have, but now an additional $600 per week boost from the federal government.

A week ago, when the bill was still un-passed and on the Senate floor for debate, some Republicans HATED that idea.

But now those very Republicans are cashing in on the good optics, touting what a wonderful thing they've done for struggling Americans.

Giphy

Take Steve Daines, Senator from Montana. That guy pulled the flip-flop in plain sight.

During the bill's debate session, Daines was one of a few senators to support an amendment to those unemployment benefits.

The amendment, which did not go through despite all but two Senate Republicans voting for it, called for a limit on the federal boost to unemployment relief to ensure that nobody would make more than they would have if still working their old job.

Sen. Ben Sasse, of Nebraska and Lindsey Graham, of South Carolina were the primary champions of the amendment. They described their logic:

"This bill, as currently drafted, creates a perverse incentive for men and women who are sidelined to then not leave the sidelines to come back to work."

That, of course, assumes that the whole virus shutdown ends by early July.

Upon supporting the amendment and catching some flack at the time, Daines' spokesperson laid out his position.

"The senator did not think that unemployment insurance should pay more than the job a person lost."

Giphy

Nevertheless, exercising some remarkably efficient short-term memory destruction, Daines appeared on a local television program in his home state of Montana to boast about the good work they've been up to, Huffington Post reports.

"This package that we passed will provide $600 a week on top of the Montana benefit if you're unemployed."
"That's very significant. It more than doubles what the state of Montana pays. That's taking care of those Montanans who've lost their jobs."

And Daines is not the only one.

Senator John Cornyn, a Republican from Texas, penned an enthusiastic op-ed in the Dallas Morning News.

"It also expands unemployment insurance eligibility, and provides an extra $600 a week in federal unemployment benefits. When it comes to covering bills and navigating this uncertainly, that money is a lifeline."

Suddenly, what was once a gross incentive to not work is now a "lifeline."

Twitter was not easily duped.



The internet remembers. Will these Senators' constituents remember too?

More from Trending

Nathan Lane
The Howard Stern Show/YouTube

Nathan Lane Opens Up About The Devastating Thing His Mom Said To Him When He Came Out As Gay

There are two types of people when it comes to first becoming acquainted with Nathan Lane: they either immediately assume that he's gay, or they assume he is a really good actor.

With some of his top achievements being The Birdcage, The Producers, Modern Family, and The Lion King, Nathan Lane is both. He's an incredible, immersive, and funny actor, but when it comes to his being gay, he's said in interview after interview that it's something he just assumes "everybody knows" about him.

Keep ReadingShow less
screenshot of Fox News interview with Karoline Leavitt before White House Correspondents Dinner
Fox News

Karoline Leavitt Made An Awkwardly Prescient Joke About The Correspondents' Dinner Before The Shooting

By now, most people are aware that a man reportedly armed with a shotgun, a handgun, and knives was able to gain access to the venue, the Washington Hilton hotel, where the White House Correspondents Dinner was taking place.

This was to be the first time MAGA Republican President Donald Trump was to ever attend the event as a sitting President. Trump had attended previously in 2011 and 2015 during Democratic President Barack Obama's presidency.

Keep ReadingShow less
Elizabeth Smart accepting an award
Frazer Harrison / Staff/Getty Images

Elizabeth Smart Reveals Her Pivot To Bodybuilding With Photo Of Her Ripped Body—And People Are Impressed

After enduring a truly horrific kidnapping experience that no one deserves to be put through, Elizabeth Smart has gone on to achieve several noteworthy accomplishments.

The child-safety activist has published numerous books, been honored with several awards, was the subject of an acclaimed Netflix documentary, and even competed on the short-lived Fox reality competition The Masked Dancer.

Keep ReadingShow less
AI-generated MAGA influencer Emily Hart
@emily_hart.nurse/Instagram

Man In India Reveals He Conned 'Super Dumb' MAGA Fans Into Paying For His Med School With Fake AI Influencer

There's a sucker born every minute, as the saying goes, and the AI revolution seems to have increased that rate exponentially—especially where MAGA is concerned.

A man in India recently shared with Wired that he's made so much money scamming MAGA devotees using AI that he now has enough to go to medical school.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump
Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

Trump's Dismissive Reaction To Concerns About Insider Trading Amid His War With Iran Speaks Infuriating Volumes

In an article for CounterPunch titled "Trump’s Casino Royale: The Iran War," Matthew Stevenson wrote:

"Given that Donald Trump conceives of the presidency as a casino—why else would he be trying to makeover the White House to look like the Bellagio?—it makes sense that his administration has turned the war with Iran into an insider-trading scheme."
"It used to be that wars were fought to make 'the world safe for democracy' or 'to end all wars' (a World War I expression), but now wars are fought so that Trump insiders can get rich quick in prediction markets or to help the president’s family (and its remittance men) corner the Persian Gulf oil market."

Pointing out who is profiting off inflating oil prices and creating false scarcity, Stevenson added:

Keep ReadingShow less