Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Scientists Are Studying What Percentage of Cells in Our Bodies Are Not Human (Hint: It's Higher Than You Think)

Scientists Are Studying What Percentage of Cells in Our Bodies Are Not Human (Hint: It's Higher Than You Think)
Pinterest.

There's more to you than meets the eye.

Make us preferred on Google

The former band White Zombie is famous for its song “More Human Than Human,” but it appears that when it comes to how many cells in your body are actually human, "Less Human Than Human" might be more accurate.

Indeed, in both the pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries, one of the hot topics of research is the human “microbiome” or the communities of microbes that make up a significant portion of the human body. Although the microbiome is currently a popular area of scientific research, the notion that a major portion of our cellular composition is not human is not a recent idea.


Actually, the idea that we are composed largely of microbial cells at a ratio of 10:1 dates back several decades. In 1970, it was estimated that there were as many as 100 billion microbes living in one gram of human intestinal feces of which there are roughly 1000 grams per the average person, thus 100 trillion microbes per person. This approximate amount was proposed by American microbiologist Dr. T. D. Luckey in a 1970 article titled “Introduction to the Ecology of the Intestinal Flora” in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. This was then followed 7 years later by another paper written by Dr. Dwayne Savage, who took the purely speculative 100 trillion microbe count and combined it with a prediction that the human body contains 10 trillion of its own cells to then create the 10:1 ratio.

Forty-six years later, this 10:1 ratio was disputed by scientists as speculative at best, as reported in The Atlantic by science journalist Ed Yong.

Multiple scientists have commented that the 10:1 ratio between microbial and human cells has little scientific basis. Dr. Ron Milo suggested that we are more likely to be on equal footing with an approximate ratio of 1:1. His 2016 review article quips that with every defecation, the ratio is upended to favor human cells over bacterial cells. Dr. Milo’s research group tried to provide a more accurate estimate of just how many microbial and human cells are inside the body. From studies that attempted to measure the number of cells in each human organ, they suggested that there should be about 30 trillion human cells.

To determine the number of bacterial cells, they looked to studies of the number of microbes in stool samples, since bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract vastly outnumber the microbial populations found elsewhere in and on the human body. They arrived at an estimate of 39 trillion microbial cells, which produces a ratio of 1.3:1; very nearly 1:1.

There are certainly caveats to this new ratio. For example, red blood cells, which represent 90% of the cells in the human body, might not be relevant since they do not undergo cellular division and contain no DNA in the nucleus. Interestingly, if they are removed from the equation, the ratio shifts back to the original Luckey-Savage estimate of 10:1.

Ed Yong questions whether the cell numbers matter in the grand scheme of things. Regardless of precise numbers, microbes will continue to play critical roles in human digestion, immune responses, and our responsiveness to certain medicines. Indeed, focusing on bacteria overlooks other smaller microbes like viruses that also have a profound impact on human biology. Science blogger Carl Zimmer has remarked that it is notable that with all the advances in life sciences, we are still unable to precisely define how many human and bacterial cells are present in the average person.

So, why is the microbiome gaining interest among pharmaceutical and cosmetic scientists?

A considerable amount of recent research has demonstrated that the microbiomes of different parts of the human body can play significant roles in various aspects of our health and appearance. For example, the resident bacteria on your skin — the skin microbiome (of which there are around 1,000 different species) — can influence your susceptibility to a variety of skin disorders. For one, a species of bacteria known as Propionibacterium acnes has been shown to play a significant role in acne and skin inflammation. In an example of bacterial species providing a benefit to humans is Staphylococcus epidermidis that is resident on human skin and contributes to preventing incursions by the highly pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus. It does so through the production of a specific enzyme that hinders the ability of S. aureus to form biofilms on the skin that could lead to infections.

These are just a few examples of the bacterial species present on the skin, but consider that there are also fungi, viruses, and other parasites present that have an impact on our health.

Historically, the characterization of the human microbiome has been accomplished first by culturing methods, where samples were collected and grown in a lab. This approach had several implicit biases, mainly that the results were skewed towards microbial species unimpeded by artificial propagation methods. Later, standard DNA sequencing was applied that illuminated the great diversity of microbes on the skin and elsewhere, where there was no bias towards organisms adapted to artificial conditions.

With the advent of next-generation sequencing, an even wider array of microbes is likely to be detected. In light of these findings, perhaps, the cell count ratio is unimportant, but the measure of diversity is the key. It seems humans are incredible habitats for a broad collection of bacteria, fungi, viruses, and parasites. “Less human than human” indeed!

More from News

Amy Adams
Alan Chapman/Dave Benett/Apple TV/Getty Images

Amy Adams Reveals She Saved Stabbing Victim's Life Thanks To Skills She Learned On Short-Lived TV Medical Drama

We've all heard how important it is to be a lifelong learner and to try to learn something new every single day. And if you're Amy Adams, what you learn might save someone's life someday.

While on the SmartLess podcast, Adams reflected on some of her biggest roles, like Arrival, and that one time she was on a limited series on CBS, only for the channel to cancel the medical drama after five episodes, even though it was only set to run for ten. The remaining five episodes were never released.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bill Burr on The Big Podcast; Shaquille O'Neal on The Big Podcast
The Big Podcast with Shaq/YouTube

Bill Burr Epically Roasts Shaq For Claiming That The Earth Is Flat Due To His Experience On Planes

There is arguably no conspiracy theory more notorious than the idea that the Earth is flat rather than round.

Despite hard scientific evidence to prove otherwise, "flat Earthers" seem to be growing at a surprising rate.

Keep ReadingShow less
Dwayne Johnson
VCG/VCG via Getty Images

Dwayne Johnson Sparks Debate After His Comments About Why He Stays Out Of Politics Rub Some Fans The Wrong Way

Former football player turned professional wrestler turned actor Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson is facing fan backlash over recent comments he's made about remaining an apolitical public figure when most of his fellow performers have chosen to either speak out against injustice in fascism or wholly embrace it.

In an interview with Esquire, Johnson criticized his colleagues for sharing their political views with the public.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Elizabeth Warren
CNBC

CNBC Includes Hilarious Typo In Chyron During Elizabeth Warren Interview About AI—And We're Obsessed

After Massachusetts Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren appeared on CNBC to decry the lack of AI regulations in the United States, the network misquoted her in a chyron with a typo when she discussed AI's "funky, hinky bookkeeping."

Warren, who has been working with Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal, a fellow Democrat, on legislation to address this deficit, also pointed out that the Trump administration has no regulators to speak of.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Linda Luttrell; Donald Trump
MS NOW; Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

Ex-Trump Supporter Brutally Rips Trump For His Treatment Of Poor Americans In Viral Interview Clip

A former Trump supporter in rural Missouri has gone viral after speaking to MS NOW reporter Rosa Flores about the impact of President Donald Trump's second term on some of the nation's poorest communities.

Ahead of the interview, a news segment notes that Flores "is traveling Route 66 to talk to real Americans about their real lives" and recently spent time speaking with people in Missouri, reporting on their current reality with midterm elections just months away.

Keep ReadingShow less