Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

We Now Know How to Teach an AI to Be a Psychopath, and the Results Are Creepy AF

We all go a little mad sometimes.

In television and movies, there's been no shortage of stories depicting a dystopian future controlled by artificial intelligence. It’s a popular entertainment trope—artificially intelligent robots turn evil and chaos ensues. The recurring plot device is seen in movies and television shows everywhere, ranging from the Terminator to Blade Runner.

Now, in a eerily similar plot twist, researchers have encouraged an actual A.I. algorithm to embrace evil. The scientists are training the A.I., called Norman, to become a legitimate, verifiable psychopath with the help of Reddit. Norman is named after Anthony Perkins’ character in Psycho.


The scientists, from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, bombarded the artificial intelligence with violent and disturbing images originally found on Reddit. Norman was then given Rorschach inkblot tests, to determine how the images had impacted its development. The results demonstrated that Norman had become a downright, verifiable psychopath.

Norman was presented with a series of images, used in many standard iterations of the Rorschach tests. Norman’s interpretations of the ink blots were compared with those from another A.I.—one that had not been exposed to violent images. In one test, the standard A.I. saw a vase, whereas Norman saw a man shot dead. When the standard A.I. reported seeing a man holding an umbrella, Norman saw a man being shot dead in front of his wife. When the standard A.I. saw a couple standing together, Norman saw a pregnant woman falling to her death off a building.

According to the researchers, the constant onslaught of disturbing images damaged Norman’s ability to engage with empathy and logic.

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that machine learning is significantly influenced by its method of input. In other words, artificial intelligence can be trained to develop biases based on the kind of data being fed to it.

“When people say that A.I. algorithms can be biased and unfair, the culprit is often not the algorithm itself, but the biased data that was fed to it,” the researchers write.

The trend toward machine learning being tainted by human social prejudices has only increased in recent years. Social bias has now developed into algorithm bias. Those algorithms now exist as mirrors that reflect the prejudices, behaviors and biases of society as a whole.

"2017, perhaps, was a watershed year, and I predict that in the next year or two the issue is only going to continue to increase in importance," said Arvind Narayanan, an assistant professor of computer science at Princeton and data privacy expert. "What has changed is the realization that these aren't specific exceptions of racial and gender bias. It's almost definitional that machine learning is going to pick up and perhaps amplify existing human biases. The issues are inescapable."

Currently, Google is one company that is attempting to steer the use of artificial intelligence towards good. In a statement released to the public, CEO Sundar Pichai, it is clear that Google intends to “do no evil” in its use and further development of artificial intelligence.

“Beyond our products, we're using A.I. to help people tackle urgent problems. A pair of high school students are building A.I.-powered sensors to predict the risk of wildfires. Farmers are using it to monitor the health of their herds. Doctors are starting to use A.I. to help diagnose cancer and prevent blindness. These clear benefits are why Google invests heavily in A.I. research and development, and makes A.I. technologies widely available to others via our tools and open-source code.”

Essentially, whether an A.I. turns out to be a psychopath is largely due to the biased information that it receives from its human creators. After all, psychopathy is a legitimate possibility of the human condition. Whether or not an artificial intelligence turns out to be good or evil depends heavily on the humans who created it.

More from News

Donald Trump holding photos of White House ballroom
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

CNN Just Used A Hilarious Poll To Show Just How Unpopular Trump's Ballroom Is—And We're Cackling

After President Donald Trump claimed that his new White House ballroom is "very popular" with the American public, CNN shared a hilariously shady poll that gets to the truth of the matter.

Last year, Trump ordered the demolition of the entire East Wing to make way for a 90,000 square-foot ballroom that will dwarf the size of the White House itself, sparking alarm from historical preservationists and the public alike.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @devynnehaddoxx's TikTok video
@devynnehaddoxx/TikTok

Woman In Labor Times How Long Her Husband Takes To Poop To See If She Can Push Their Baby Out Faster In Hilarious Viral Video

It's well-known across the internet that it takes forever for men to use the restroom. For dads especially, in the time it takes them to poop, when they return to the house, their kids will have aged seven years, and their baby will have learned to walk.

These are jokes, of course, but it's an internet consensus that men spend a really long time on the porcelain throne.

Keep ReadingShow less
David Letterman (left) has continued defending Stephen Colbert (right) as CBS faces backlash over canceling The Late Show.
Kevin Winter/Getty Images; Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images

David Letterman Rips 'Lying Weasels' At CBS For Claiming Colbert Was Canceled For Financial Reasons In Epic Takedown

David Letterman isn’t staying quiet about CBS canceling The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. As Colbert’s run comes to an end later this month, the former late-night host is publicly challenging the network’s claim that the decision was purely financial.

Letterman, who hosted The Late Show from 1993 until stepping down in 2015, addressed the controversy during a new interview with New York Times journalist Jason Zinoman.

Keep ReadingShow less
Antonia Eastwood; Gemma Monk
Antonia Eastwood/MSN; Cover Images

Woman Speaks Out After Prison Sentence To Reveal What Led Her To Hurl Black Paint At Sister-In-Law On Her Wedding Day

In early 2024, 49-year-old Antonia Eastwood married Ashley Monk after about five months of dating. During the ceremony, Antonia tripped while walking down the aisle.

Antonia and Ashley were both suspicious that she did not trip accidentally and that Ashley's sister, Gemma, actually tripped her. Gemma and Antonia were not close, and the couple also believed that Gemma might be jealous that they were marrying after five months, though she'd been with her childhood sweetheart for 20 years without tying the knot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Billie Eilish on 'Good Hang'
Good Hang with Amy Poehler/YouTube

Billie Eilish's Refreshingly Blunt Take On Aging And 'Botched' Plastic Surgery Has Fans Nodding Hard

You know what they say: the grass is greener on the other side. Most people want something that they don't have.

While many people right now are fixated on appearing younger than their age, Billie Eilish—who already looks younger than her age—is looking forward to what comes next.

Keep ReadingShow less