Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Jeb Bush's PAC Response to Trump’s Lawsuit Threats Is Required Reading

Jeb Bush's PAC Response to Trump’s Lawsuit Threats Is Required Reading

Last week, David McCraw, vice president and assistant general counsel of the New York Times, slammed Donald Trump in a scathing letter after Trump threatened to sue the newspaper for libel for publishing the detailed accounts of two women who came forward to accuse Trump of sexual assault. The Times letter reminded us of this story.

In December 2015, Trump threatened Miami healthcare magnate Mike Fernandez––a top Jeb Bush political donor––with legal action over Miami Herald newspaper ads that slammed Trump as a "narcissistic BULLYionaire." Fernandez did not notify the Bush campaign of his plans. “You have no idea how furious I am with my friends in the Republican Party who have embraced this guy,” Fernandez, who planned to run similar ads in Des Moines and Las Vegas newspapers, said at the time. Trump's attorney, Alan Garten, also sent a letter to James Robinson, the treasurer of Jeb Bush's Right to Rise (RTR) leadership PAC. Shortly afterward, Charlie Spies, the D.C. based counsel to RTR, sent a response.


In his opening salvo, Spies noted that RTR "has never produced, and has no plans to produce, advertisements against your client, or any political candidate for that matter." He further asserted that RTR was established to support conservative candidates through direct monetary contributions, writing that, in fact, "RTR has made almost $300,000 in contributions since its creation in January 2015. Unlike your client, we only support conservative candidates." (According to a Politifact breakdown, Trump's "loyalties have not been exclusive to Republicans: Trump has given $584,000 over the past 26 years to Democrats and he gave over $961,000 to Republicans over that same time.)

"It is possible you are confusing RTR with any number of federal independent expenditure-only committees (i.e. "Super PACs") that have exercised their First Amendment rights to educate the public about your client's public statements and stances on important public policy issues," Spies continued. He suggested that Garten "consult the Federal Election Commission's ("FEC") website (www.fec.gov) to familiarize yourself about the differences between Leadership PACs and Super PACs, or perhaps skim through the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. FEC or the D.C. Circuit's decision in Speechnow.org v. FEC." (In both decisions, the courts held that freedom of speech prohibits the government from restricting corporations and labor unions from spending as much as they want to convince people to vote for or against a candidate.)

Spies also took Garten to task for what he called "litigious threats and bullying." Should Trump "actually be elected Commander-in-Chief, will you be the one writing the cease and desist letters to Vladimir Putin, or will that be handled by outside counsel?"

As a candidate for President, Spies continued, "your client is a public figure and his campaign should, and will, be fact-checked. The ability to criticize a candidate's record, policies and matters of public importance lies at the heart of the First Amendment, as courts have repeatedly recognized. If you have the time between bankruptcy filings and editing reality show contracts, we urge you to flip through the Supreme Court's decision in New York Times v. Sullivan." (In this decision, the Court held that the First Amendment "protects the publication of all statements, even false ones, about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with actual malice (with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity).")

"If your client is so thin-skinned that he cannot handle his critics' presentation of his own public statements, policies and record to the voting public, and if such communications hurts his feelings, he is welcome to purchase airtime to defend his record," Spies wrote. "After all, a wall can be built around many things, but not around the First Amendment."

Lastly, Spies pointed out that federal candidates are prohibited from using corporate resources for campaign purposes according to the Federal Election Campaign Act and the FEC's regulations. Although Trump "may think he is above the law and be accustomed to using lawsuits to bail out his failed business deals," he wrote, "the Federal Election Campaign Act and the FEC's Regulations nonetheless apply to him and his campaign. Perhaps the attached complaint, filed today, will serve as a reminder of your client's legal obligations under federal election laws. Just as your client is attempting to quickly learn the basics of foreign policy, we wish you personally the best in your attempts to learn election law."

More from People

Lady Gaga
David Jon/Getty Images for HBO

Lady Gaga Was Just Spotted In Paris—And Fans Think They Know Why

Lady Gaga recently fueled rumors regarding her potential performance at the 2024 Paris Olympics closing ceremony.

Speculation began on July 11 after French outlet Purepeople reported the news, and fans noticed that Thomas Jolly, the artistic director for the ceremonies, had followed Gaga on Instagram.

Keep ReadingShow less
Instagram screenshots of Tom Daley and cardboard bed
@tomdaley/Instagram

Diver Tom Daley Hilariously Tests Out 'Anti-Sex' Cardboard Beds For Paris Olympics Athletes

A couple of months ago, the internet was buzzing with news that "anti-sex" beds were installed at the Olympic village ahead of the 2024 summer games in Paris in an effort to keep competitors from... well, you know.

Thankfully for all of social media and, of course, the other athletes, British diver Tom Daley has arrived in Paris and conducted some field research on the beds, which are made from completely recyclable mattresses and cardboard frames.

Keep ReadingShow less
Chadwick Boseman; Kamala Harris
Sarah Morris/FilmMagic/Getty Images; Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Chadwick Boseman's Final Tweet Supporting Harris Resurfaces—And Fans Are Feeling Emotional

On Sunday, President Biden announced he would not be seeking a second term as president and pulled out of the presidential race.

Soon after, he endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Newt Gingrich discussing Jill Biden
Fox News

Newt Gingrich Ripped For Saying Jill Biden Shouldn't Attend Paris Olympics After Joe Dropped Out

Former GOP House Speaker Newt Gingrich was criticized after claiming that First Lady Dr. Jill Biden shouldn't "take taxpayer money" to attend the opening ceremony of the 2024 Olympic Games in Paris now that her husband, President Joe Biden, has dropped out of the race for reelection.

On Sunday, Biden announced he would drop out of the presidential race and readily endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris as his replacement. At 81, Biden faced increasing concerns within his party about his age and capacity to serve another term, along with fears of a potential loss to former President Donald Trump—who is 78—in November.

Keep ReadingShow less