Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

We Now Know How the Trump Administration Plans to Reunite Migrant Children With Their Families, and Yeah, They Have No Idea Who Their Parents Are

We Now Know How the Trump Administration Plans to Reunite Migrant Children With Their Families, and Yeah, They Have No Idea Who Their Parents Are
TOPSHOT - Watched by Vice President Mike Pence, US President Donald Trump shows an executive order on immigration which he just signed in the Oval Office of the White House on June 20, 2018 in Washington, DC. - US President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order aimed at putting an end to the controversial separation of migrant families at the border, reversing a harsh practice that had earned international scorn."It's about keeping families together," Trump said at the signing ceremony. "I did not like the sight of families being separated," he added. (Photo by Mandel Ngan / AFP) (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)

What could go wrong?

The U.S. government is performing DNA tests on children and parents in an attempt to reunite migrant families separated at the U.S.-Mexico border, according to Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar.

"It's important to remember that information from children can at times be unreliable," Azar said, noting that the agency is reviewing the cases of nearly 3,000 children, a number that is larger than the 2,047 he'd previously told a Senate panel still need to be reunited with their parents. Azar told reporters that the number is much larger "because a court order has required HHS to reunite all separated migrant children, even those taken from their parents before zero tolerance went into effect in early May."


Some children who are part of the nearly 3,000 in the agency's custody may not qualify for reunification, Azar noted, because the children became separated from their parents on their journey to the United States, and not by Border Patrol agents.

HHS will be conducting DNA tests by taking a cheek swab of every child before matching him or her with a parent.

"The safety and security is paramount, and it is not uncommon for children to be trafficked or smuggled by those claiming to be parents," an official with the agency said.

"To our knowledge, this is a cheek swab and is being done to expedite parental verification and ensuring reunification with verified parents due to child welfare concerns," the official added, though they did not clarify how long the practice has been taking place, if the testing requires consent or if the DNA is stored in a database.

The move comes after a federal judge in the Southern District of California ordered that the government must reunite parents separated from children younger than 5 by July 10 and children ages 5-17 by July 26. These deadlines are "extreme," said Azar, warning that the deadline would likely require the agency to be a bit laxer in its vetting procedures.

"We will comply even if those deadlines prevent us from conducting a standard or even a truncated vetting process," Azar said.

The news that the government is performing DNA tests in order to reunite families marred by the humanitarian crisis which erupted in the wake of President Donald Trump's "zero tolerance" family separations policy opened up the federal government to criticism from RAICES, a nonprofit in Texas that offers free and low-cost legal services to immigrants and refugees. The aid group raised concerns about potential surveillance.

This is a further demonstration of administration's incompetence and admission of guilt. This further drives home the point we've been saying: They never registered parents and children properly," RAICES communications director Jennifer K. Falcon said.

Falcon added that it's not possible for migrant children––including some who are as young as two months old––to consent to DNA testing. RAICES said "they'd never heard of conducting DNA tests to reunite families before and they don't," according to CNN.

The news also alarmed many who criticized the government's lack of preparedness to remedy the crisis.

The president has not offered solutions for the crisis––but has continued tweeting.

Earlier today, the president sent out tweets dealing with immigration.

"Congress must pass smart, fast and reasonable Immigration Laws now," he tweeted.

And the family separation saga is "likely to get worse," notes commentator Chris Cillizza.

What's even more striking is that Trump's solution to stop the family separations at the border -- an executive order that allows children to be detained with their parents -- is a stop-gap solution that is about to expire. Why? Because Trump's executive order did not override a Supreme Court decision from the early 1990s that says a child cannot be held in a detention facility for more than 20 days. Which means that on or around July 10 -- 20 days from Trump's signing of the EO on June 20 -- border enforcement officials will be required to start separating families currently being held in detention centers.

In short: The family separation crisis is likely to get worse -- and soon.

Trump's call for Congress to act is also hollow: Two comprehensive immigration bills failed in the last week. White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was excoriated last week after she claimed that the president wasn't lying when he claimed he "never pushed" House Republicans to vote on immigration legislation. A look through the president's tweets proved her words were false.

More from People/donald-trump

Elmo; New York Knicks
Paul Zimmerman/WireImage; Gregory Shamus/Getty Images

Elmo Hit With Hilarious Backlash From New Yorkers After Tweeting Well-Wishes To Both The Knicks And The Spurs

Sesame Street may be set on a fictional street in a Manhattan neighborhood, but only a select few characters have that New York attitude.

Lovable, cuddly little Elmo is definitely not one of them, and it recently got him in a bit of trouble with fans of the New York Knicks.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump
Samuel Corum/Getty Images

Trump Plans To Attend The NBA Finals In New York—And Knicks Fans Are Having None Of It

The New York Knicks lead the NBA finals best of seven series against the San Antonio Spurs 2-0 going into game three at Madison Square Garden (MSG) in New York City on Monday night.

It will be the first finals game played at the historic venue in 27 years. Should the Knicks prevail in the series, it will be the team's first championship since 1973.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Hillary Clinton in 2016; Donald Trump
C-SPAN; Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

Hillary Clinton's 2016 Speech Predicting How Trump Would Behave As President Just Resurfaced—And Wow

People can't help but nod their heads after one of former Secretary of State and then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's speeches from 2016 warning about how Donald Trump would act if elected president resurfaced and proved more relevant than ever.

The footage resurfaced as public sentiment has soured on the economy; recent surveys show that roughly two-thirds of Americans disapprove of Trump's economic stewardship, while a majority say their personal financial situation is deteriorating.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of James Talarico; Donald Trump; Ken Paxton
@jamestalarico/X; Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images; Ron Jenkins/Getty Images

James Talarico Epically Blasts Trump And Senate Opponent Over What It Means To Be A 'Real Man'

Texas Senate candidate James Talarico criticized his opponent in November's election, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, as well as President Donald Trump in a speech about what it means to be a "real man" after facing regular attacks on his masculinity.

Trump has described Talarico as “a weird—a weird—candidate,” a line that was quickly incorporated into an advertisement from Paxton, who argued that that Talarico is unfit to represent Texans partly because of his supposed veganism. Members of the right-wing have followed suit and described Talarico as an “effeminate, estrogenetic, catty, and totally embarrassing” candidate.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jennifer Aniston (right) and Lisa Kudrow (left) discuss a potential Friends spinoff.
Variety/YouTub

Jennifer Aniston And Lisa Kudrow's Idea For A 'Friends' Spinoff Is Going Viral For All The Wrong Reasons

For decades, critics have argued that Friends benefited from a television landscape that often overlooked Black-led sitcoms telling similar stories. So when Jennifer Aniston and Lisa Kudrow recently floated the idea of a Friends spinoff called Girlfriends, many viewers saw it as yet another example of Black television history being left out of the conversation.

During Variety's Actors on Actors, Aniston and Kudrow discussed what a potential Friends revival could look like more than 20 years after the sitcom ended its original run.

Keep ReadingShow less