Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

The Jan. 6 Committee Has the Goods on Trump To Make a Criminal Referral–So Why Is It Hesitating?

The Jan. 6 Committee Has the Goods on Trump To Make a Criminal Referral–So Why Is It Hesitating?
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY), the vice-chair of the House Select Committee on January 6, expressed confidence that the former president and his associates committed crimes in connection with January 6. “It’s absolutely clear that what President Trump was doing, what a number of people around him were doing, that they knew it was unlawful. They did it anyway,” Cheney told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “State of the Union.” Based on this, she confirmed that the Committee does indeed have enough evidence to make a criminal referral to the Justice Department.

And yet. The New York Times also reported that the Committee at this point is uncertain—in its words, “split”—on whether they should go ahead with the referral. The idea that no criminal referral might be forthcoming set off howls among some critics of the former president. But a few complex considerations are likely guiding this curious hesitation, so let’s delve a bit deeper.


The Committee May Not Want to Politicize Its Findings

While the Committee’s primary task has been investigatory, it certainly has the power at the conclusion of its hearings, findings, and report to include a criminal referral of any number of people, including the former president, to the Justice Department. But that move could in theory undermine any case brought by the Department by giving opponents an easy way to label it a partisan prosecution.

While the Committee is technically bipartisan, within the House GOP its work only has the support of the two Republicans who already serve on it, Rep. Cheney and Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL), who are both staunch critics of the former president. Further, the move to criminally refer Trump may bear symbolic significance, but it carries no actual weight. The Justice Department is going to make up its own mind anyway based on the facts and evidence. So skeptics of the criminal referral wonder if it may wind up doing more harm than good.

Nonsense, say its proponents. The job of the Committee is to arrive at the truth, and if the truth is that the former president and his associates committed crimes, then the Committee has an obligation to make the referral, without regard to the political effect it might have. Besides, they argue, no matter what the Committee does, if the Justice Department brings charges it will be labeled by Trump and his allies as a partisan attack. Worse, if no criminal referral is made, the GOP may cite that as evidence that their case is weak.

There are merits to both sides of this argument, which makes the Committee’s decision both more difficult and more consequential.

A Federal Judge Has Already Found that Crimes Likely Were Committed

Weighing against referral, say some Committee members, is the fact that a federal judge already has ruled against Trump on the matter. That opinion will carry far more sway with the Justice Department than any referral from the Committee could, some argue, making such any referral just so much extra political baggage on an otherwise solid and tidy case.

Judge David Carter of the Central District of California ruled in a civil matter, based on the evidence presented by the January 6 Committee, that Trump and his erstwhile attorney John Eastman—the author of the infamous coup memo—likely committed two federal felonies in their attempt to overturn the results of the November 2020 election. While that ruling was made in connection to a dispute over whether claims of attorney-client privilege could be overcome under the “crime-fraud” exception to the privilege, it gave the Committee a unique opportunity to lay out its case, as best as it presently could, to show a neutral third party judge that there was fire behind the smoke after all.

The ruling of a federal judge is far more likely to be taken seriously by the public than a criminal referral by the Committee. Imagine, for example, Attorney General Garland giving a press conference and citing not the findings of the January 6 Committee but the ruling of a federal judge as grounds to launch a criminal case against the former president. The media take on such a pronouncement likely would be decidedly different.

Further, as I wrote about earlier, it appears that the Justice Department already is investigating members of Trump’s inner circle with respect to how the rally before the insurrection was funded and organized, and importantly how much they knew about plans to attempt to use violence. As the Justice Department makes its way up the ladder, albeit very slowly and methodically, it may not make sense to throw a bomb into that process by way of a criminal referral. Rep. Cheney directly referenced the continuing work of the Department in this regard, citing a recent plea agreement by Charles Donohoe of the Proud Boys, who admitted to conspiring to help organize a Trump supporter attack on Congress with the intention of stopping the electoral count proceedings. Rep. Cheney remarked that the evidence showed event organizers and planners “knew that they were going to attempt to use violence to stop the transfer of power.” If true, there would exist a direct connection between the Trump White House and the weaponization of the mob through knowing incitement of those assembled, followed by corrupt inaction to put a stop to them.

Moreover, the Justice Department has already signaled that it does not jump on command with respect to criminal referrals from Congress. To date, it has only moved forward with one referred case by charging former Trump aide Steve Bannon with criminal contempt of Congress. With respect to others who have been referred, including former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and now former aides Peter Navarro and Dan Scavino, the Department has remained silent. Indeed, it has been well over two months since it received the referral on Meadows. The Department’s reasons for slow walking or ignoring the contempt referrals remain a mystery, but they could have to do with a strong desire not to be seen as beholden to Democrats in Congress.

Ultimately, the Committee will act based on how its chair, vice-chair and the majority of its members, who have the closest eye on the facts and the investigation, wish to proceed. Rep. Cheney pushed back on the idea that the Committee was at all “split” over the issue. “There’s not really a dispute on the Committee,” she said. “The Committee is working in a really collaborative way to discuss these issues, as we are with all of the issues we’re addressing, and we’ll continue to work together to do so.”

For more political analysis, check out the Status Kuo newsletter.

More from News

X screenshot of guy smashing guitar; Taylor Swift
@TONYxTWO/X; Doug Peters/PA Images via Getty Images

Turns Out The Guitar A Texas Man Bid $4k On And Smashed Wasn't Even Signed By Taylor Swift

A couple of days ago, a man in Waxahachie, Texas, went viral on social media for bidding $4000 on a guitar signed by Taylor Swift at an event called Ellis County Wild Game Dinner—and immediately beating it with a hammer.

And though the guy definitely did not prove whatever kind of point he was trying to make in the first place, it just got better.

Keep ReadingShow less
Rudy Giuliani; Caroline Rose Giuliani and Kamala Harris
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images; @carolinerosegiu/Instagram

Rudy Giuliani's Daughter Implores People To Vote For Harris In Emotional Essay Slamming Trump

Caroline Rose Giuliani, the daughter of former New York City Mayor Giuliani, penned a heartbreaking essay for Vanity Fair about "watching my dad’s life crumble" since he joined forces with former President Donald Trump.

In it, she implored Americans to vote for Vice President Kamala Harris on Election Day, saying "it would be naive for us to ignore the fact that many of those closest to Trump have descended into catastrophic downward spirals" and that "If we let Trump back into the driver's seat this fall, our country will be no exception."

Keep ReadingShow less
Joe Biden and Jimmy Carter
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Biden Pays Poignant Tribute To 'Beloved Friend' Jimmy Carter As He Celebrates His 100th Birthday

President Joe Biden praised former President Jimmy Carter for his 100th birthday on Tuesday in a video released by CBS, calling Carter "one of the most influential statesmen in our history."

When Carter entered hospice care at his home last year, his family and friends feared he had only days left. Yet, more than 19 months later, he marks a historic milestone, becoming the first U.S. president to reach 100 years of age.

Keep ReadingShow less
Woman looking out window
xandtor/Unsplash

People Describe The Strangest Things Their Neighbors Have Ever Done

How well do you know your neighbors?

Depending on your view, whether it's through an apartment window or over the backyard fence, you might have the best seat at witnessing the crazy things your neighbors do.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kaitlan Collins and Donald Trump Jr.
CNN

Kaitlan Collins Hits Don Jr. With Mic Drop Reminder After He Blames Media For Calling Trump 'Hitler'

After Donald Trump Jr. tried to blame the media for exacerbating threats against his father, former President Donald Trump, by calling him "literally Hitler," CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins gave him a brutal reminder about something Trump's own running mate J.D. Vance himself had said.

Speaking to Collins in the spin room after Vance's debate with Vice President Kamala Harris's running mate Tim Walz, Trump Jr. said that the media is responsible for the heightened political tensions nationwide, implying that news reporters have stoked an environment that resulted in two failed attempts on his father's life.

Keep ReadingShow less