A little magic can go a long way. via Nameless.tv

Actor Britt Lower had one of the biggest moments of the night at Sunday's Emmys with her big win for Apple TV's Severance, but the real moment for fans was blink-and-you-miss-it.
Lower won the Emmy for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series for the show, and during her speech she did the usual rounds of "thank yous" for her family, friends, and colleagues.
But eagle-eyed fans noticed something extra special written on the back of her speech: A reference to the show's trapped-in-office-hell concept.
On the back of her speech notes were written three words fans of the show will instantly know the meaning of: "Let me out."
In Severance, the characters exist in a world where they have the option of having their brains surgically altered so that they never remember anything that goes on at their stultifying corporate office jobs.
When they enter the building, they basically become a different person—called their "innie"—until they exit the building at the end of the day as their "outtie." The outtie's memories are effectively "severed" from the innie's so they have no recollection of having worked at Lumon Industries, and vice versa for the innies, who have no idea who they are outside the office.
Got it?
It allows them to cope with how miserable their existence is, either in the office or in their personal lives. But Lower's innie character decides she wants out, and writes "let me out" on her arms before leaving work in hopes her outtie will do just that.
Having it written on the back of her speech is a brilliant nod to this storyline and the show in general. While she was doing business as usual for an actress at an awards show, thanking her "heroic cast and crew," her work "innie" was issuing a cry for help, albeit a tongue-in-cheek one.
And online, fans of the show were absolutely here for Lower's brilliant Easter egg.
This is Lower's first Emmy. She has previously been seen in the series Unforgettable, Man Seeking Woman and American Horror Story.
President Donald Trump's senior counselor Peter Navarro was swiftly fact-checked after claiming during a CNBC interview that Democrats sent him to prison as a political attack, asserting that leftists went after him how "they got" Charlie Kirk, the far-right activist who was assassinated last week.
Navarro, who also served during Trump's first administration and participated in attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 general election, holds the distinction of being the first former White House official imprisoned on a contempt-of-Congress conviction.
Navarro faced charges of criminal contempt for failing to comply with congressional subpoenas, similar to former Trump ally Steve Bannon, who was convicted in a similar case and later appealed. Navarro previously claimed that the trials against him are "very expensive" and said they are an example of Democrats using "lawfare" to crush their political opponents.
He said the following to CNBC:
"There's a disturbing asymmetry between what the left is doing to us and what we're not doing to them. ... I was in the first administration all four years. Every single person I was in with suffered from some kind of lawfare. At minimum it was Dan Scavino, Mark Meadows ran up millions of dollars in legal bills."
"Bannon and I went to prison. We had the president trying to be put in prison by four different courts, two assassination attempts. Now they got Charlie."
Then one CNBC host chimed in:
"You went to prison for refusing... it was contempt of Congress that sent you there."
Navarro replied:
"I went to prison because it was my duty as presidential adviser to refuse the subpoena. That was the policy of the Department of Justice for more than 50 years. There was no dispute about that. They changed the policy to put me in."
You can hear what Navarro said in the video below.
- YouTube www.youtube.com
Navarro was quickly called out for twisting the facts behind his imprisonment.
Navarro's trial, presided over by District Judge Amit Mehta, had broad implications for congressional oversight and executive privilege.
Judge Mehta ruled against Navarro's assertion that his conversations with then-President Trump were protected under executive privilege, calling it "pretty weak sauce." Mehta stated that Navarro had not provided specific evidence to support his executive privilege claim, leading to the rejection of this defense.
Saturday Night Live turned 50 last year and a lot of former cast members and major celebrities joined in the season long celebration, but it's a new year and it's time to get back to business.
Which, with SNL, usually means some cast changes—out with the old (and sometimes not so old) and in with the new. Show creator and producer Lorne Michaels recently announced SNL would return on October 4 with a literal handful—five—cast changes.
Five members of the 50th season cast are departing and five new featured players are being added.
Over the summer, the departures of Heidi Gardner, Michael Longfellow, Emil Wakim, Devon Walker, and most recently Ego Nwodim became the largest cast turnover since 2022, when eight performers left.
Attending the Emmy Awards on Sunday, where the "SNL50" special picked up another statuette for Michaels' collection, the show's executive producer addressed the most recent cast shakeup.
- YouTubeyoutu.be
Michaels told Entertainment Tonight on the red carpet:
"The show has always brought people in from different ages and different generations and it’s how it revives itself."
"It’s always hard when people leave, but there’s a time for that and our audience has always stayed relatively young, and more so now with TikTok."
"Change is good. The people we’re bringing in, I’m really excited about."
SNL newbies are aghast, but people familiar with the show aren't surprised when cast changes are announced.
r/television/Reddit
r/television/Reddit
r/television/Reddit
r/television/Reddit
r/television/Reddit
r/television/Reddit
r/television/Reddit
r/television/Reddit
r/television/Reddit
r/television/Reddit
r/television/Reddit
Cast changes after every season have been a hallmark of SNL over the past 50 years.
Some performers left for film or other television work, which had gutted the original cast by 1980 when the last four original Not Ready for Prime Time Players—Jane Curtin, Garrett Morris, Laraine Newman and Gilda Radner (along with season two addition Bill Murray)—all left the show.
Others fell victim to budget cuts, just weren't a good fit for the show, or were casualties of the decision to regroup and rebrand again, and they exited SNL earlier than they wanted.
In the Michaels' biography, Lorne: The Man Who Invented Saturday Night Live, Susan Morrison wrote:
"The cryptic hiring protocols extend to staying hired. Cast and writers are supposed to be notified by July about whether they are being asked back. (Michaels has a rule about not making big decisions in June, when he is sick of everyone, and exhausted.)"
"That date often slips by, with people not knowing their fates until Labor Day, a month before the season premiere."
The season 11 premiere in 1985 saw an entirely new cast, but the next season began with most of that cast pruned.
Among those let go in 1986 were Joan Cusack, Robert Downey Jr., Anthony Michael Hall, Randy Quaid, Terry Sweeney—the show's first openly LGBTQ+ cast member, and Damon Wayans. Clearly there's life, and a career, after getting the SNL axe.
Since SNL's debut in 1975, there have been 172 cast members.
Considering the internet and apps didn't exist when the show premiered, casting has evolved over time as well. The new additions for season 51—Ben Marshall, Tommy Brennan, Kam Patterson, Veronika Slowikowska, and Jeremy Culhane—are from the SNL writers room, the stand-up stage, and... TikTok.
Speaking during a memorial service for far-right activist Charlie Kirk at the Kennedy Center, failed Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake—now the Trump administration's Senior Advisor for the U.S. Agency for Global Media—called U.S. colleges “indoctrination camps” and urged parents not to send their children.
Lake ignored the fact that Kirk was killed while speaking at a college, in this case Utah Valley University (UVU), the largest university by enrollment in Utah.
Lake herself graduated from college, receiving a BA in communications and journalism from the University of Iowa, though she conveniently left that part out when she railed against institutions of higher learning.
She said:
"We've got to stop this, folks. We can't let this go on. This violence has got to stop. It's got to stop and I'm not going to say our side is perfect but damn it, this is coming from the other side."
"How does a 22-year-old [Kirk's killer] become so filled with hate? Five years earlier, I was told, he was a Trump supporter and we sent our kids off to college and they brainwashed them."
“I am making a plea to mothers out there. Do not send your children into these indoctrination camps. Don’t do it. Do not do it.”
You can hear what she said in the video below.
Many have called out Lake over her remarks.
Conservatives have argued for years that college degrees no longer guarantee bright futures, and criticized what they perceive as an emphasis on "social justice" and "indoctrination."
Overall, their opposition to what they've termed "woke colleges" reflects an anti-intellectual stance and an aversion to examining systemic power dynamics.
Moreover, Lake's remarks betrayed a singular unawareness that even conservative-leaning institutions such as Liberty University and Brigham Young University offer programs and courses that may be considered "indoctination camps" by her own standards.
Vice President JD Vance served as host of the late far-right activist Charlie Kirk's podcast this week and was called out after claiming Kirk "never uttered" words about the "brain processing power" of Black women—even though Kirk said as much in 2023.
Vance made the claim after Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah—a Black woman—said she was dismissed from the paper following social media posts on gun control and race after Kirk’s assassination.
Attiah said the Post fired her after 11 years for “speaking out against political violence, racial double standards, and America’s apathy toward guns." In a Substack post, she said:
"[The Post] accused “my measured Bluesky posts of being ‘unacceptable,' ‘gross misconduct’ and of endangering the physical safety of colleagues – charges without evidence, which I reject completely as false."
“They rushed to fire me without even a conversation. This was not only a hasty overreach, but a violation of the very standards of journalistic fairness and rigor the Post claims to uphold.”
One of Kirk's remarks that Attiah highlighted was one he made on a July 2023 episode of The Charlie Kirk Show:
"If we would have said that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would have been called racists."
"Now they’re coming out and they’re saying it for us … You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously."
But Vance denied Kirk ever said that during an appearance discussing Attiah's dismissal:
"The writer accuses Charlie of saying, and I quote, 'Black women do not have brain processing power to be taken seriously.' But if you go and watch the clip, the very clip she links to, you realize he never said anything like that."
"He never uttered those words."
You can hear what Vance said and hear Kirk's remarks on record in the video below.
Vance was swiftly called out.
Attiah’s position was seen as vulnerable after disputes with Post opinion editor Adam O’Neal, who has reportedly offered buyouts to writers whose work doesn’t align with the paper’s editorial direction under billionaire owner Jeff Bezos.
Bezos’s company, Amazon, donated $1 million to President Donald Trump’s second inauguration fund, and the Post opted not to endorse a candidate in the November election Trump ultimately won, despite its editorial board having earlier voted to back Democratic nominee Kamala Harris.
Attiah said she “was the last remaining Black full-time opinion columnist” at the Post, adding that Washington, D.C., "one of the nation’s most diverse regions…no longer has a paper that reflects the people it serves." She said her firing is “part of a broader purge of Black voices from academia, business, government, and media."
The Washington Post guild said that in firing Attiah, the paper "not only flagrantly disregarded standard disciplinary processes, it also undermined its own mandate to be a champion of free speech."