Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Trump Just Claimed 'Absolute Immunity' In Jan 6 Lawsuit–And The Mockery Was Swift

Trump Just Claimed 'Absolute Immunity' In Jan 6 Lawsuit–And The Mockery Was Swift
Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

Former Republican President Donald Trump's legal team filed an official appeal in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, asking for immunity from civil lawsuits related to the January 6 insurrection a Trump rally and prior rhetoric incited.

Trump's attorneys made clear Trump seeks the reversal of United States District Judge Amit Mehta's February decision, which says Trump could be held civilly liable over the attack and rejected his request for immunity.


The court filing is Trump's latest attempt to evade accountability for his role in inciting the insurrection, which took place after a White nationalist lead mob of his supporters attacked the United States Capitol on the false premise the 2020 presidential election had been stolen.

The violence that erupted that day left at least five people dead and resulted in over 100 injuries to law enforcement as well as millions of dollars in damages.

You can read Trump's court filing by clicking on the link below.

Trump's attorneys contend that Trump already faced consequences over the attack when the "Democratic-controlled House" impeached him for it. Given that the Senate later acquitted Trump in a 57-43 vote, the legal team said that any further lawsuits would amount to harassment.

Decrying the "hyperbole of violence" in relation to January 6, the legal team claimed Trump "is shielded by absolute presidential immunity" and have requested that the constitutionality of presidential immunity be tested in court.

They wrote:

"President Trump is shielded by absolute presidential immunity because his statements were on matters of public concern and therefore well within the scope of the robust absolute immunity afforded all presidents."

Many have criticized this move as yet another attempt by Trump to obstruct proceedings and not face actual consequences for his role in the attack.



Trump has long suggested that he is protected by executive privilege, which gives Presidents the ability to assert confidentiality and withhold information in the public interest.

He has continued to refuse to comply with the House Select Committee tasked with investigating the insurrection—such as last year, when he declined to submit documentation regarding his mental stability—despite the fact that legal analysts have noted executive privilege does not extend to efforts to stop the certification of an election Democrat Joe Biden won.

Moreover, they have said that executive privilege specifically belongs to the officer-holder: Biden himself.

Last week, the House Select Committee tasked with investigating the insurrection used one hearing to present a cohesive timeline of what Trump did—and did not do—during a crucial 187-minute period while the attack was underway.

The committee said that Trump had shown "complete dereliction of duty" after witnesses testified that he ignored pleas to condemn the violence and call off the mob.

White House officials said that Trump did not make any calls to the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General or the Secretary of Homeland Security during the attack and that he sat in the dining room and watched the attack on television.

More from People/donald-trump

Barron Trump
Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images

Former 'South Park' Writer Leads Charge To Send Barron Trump To Fight In Iran With New Website

The hashtag #SendBarron is trending on social media thanks in part to a website created by former South Park writer Toby Morton.

Morton, a comedian, runs dozens of political parody sites, including TrumpKennedyCenter.org which he used to troll MAGA Republican President Donald Trump. The site opens to photos of Trump with registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of moments when Brian McGinnis was dragged out of a hearing by Capitol Police and Tim Sheehy
@alanhe/X

MAGA Senator Appears To Snap Arm Of Marine Vet Protesting Iran War In Alarming Video

Montana Republican Senator Tim Sheehy has alarmed critics after he reportedly broke the arm of Brian McGinnis, an anti-war U.S. Marine veteran and political candidate, while helping U.S. Capitol Police remove him from a Senate Armed Services Subcommittee hearing for protesting the war in Iran.

McGinnis is running as a Green Party candidate in North Carolina's Senate race. Roughly half an hour into the hearing on military readiness, proceedings were interrupted when a man identified as McGinnis began shouting from the room.

Keep ReadingShow less
Karoline Leavitt
Win McNamee/Getty Images

Karoline Leavitt Slammed After Suggesting Reports Of Deadly Strike On Iranian Girls' School Are Just 'Propaganda'

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was criticized after she rejected reports that the U.S. struck a girls' elementary school in Iran, killing 175 people, insisting in remarks to the press pool that it's just Iranian "propaganda" that they've "fallen" for.

Iranian state media and health officials said the strike occurred early Saturday morning in Minab, in the country’s southern Hormozgan Province. Journalists from international news organizations have not been granted access to independently verify the reported death toll or the circumstances surrounding the strike.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @madswellness's TikTok video
@madswellness/TikTok

Woman Sparks Debate With Her Viral Hot Take That We Should 'Normalize Not Liking Dogs'

We're all different people with different interests, and it's perfectly okay that we like different things.

But there are some people who passionately, even vehemently, draw the line at other people liking or disliking dogs.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @vanellimelli030's TikTok video
@vanellimelli030/TikTok

Model Accuses Fashion Brand Of Using AI To Recreate Her Looks For Ad Instead Of Hiring Her

There used to be laws in place for someone's likeness being used without their consent, and most certainly if their likeness was being used in an exploitative way for profit.

But now with the rise of AI-generated photographs, advertisements, and other digital products, the lines seem to have become muddied between the illegal stealing of someone's likeness and AI "inspiration."

Keep ReadingShow less