Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Trump's Own Intelligence Watchdog Debunks Trump's Latest Conspiracy Theory About the Whistleblower Complaint

Trump's Own Intelligence Watchdog Debunks Trump's Latest Conspiracy Theory About the Whistleblower Complaint
President Donald Trump speaks on the telephone in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on December 24, 2018. (Photo by Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images)

Nice try tho.

Since Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced a formal impeachment inquiry to be conducted by the House of Representatives, President Donald Trump, members of his administration and allies in Congress scrambled to subvert Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.

To that end, Senate Judiciary Committee member and fervent Trump supporter Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) claimed Sunday on Face the Nation that the regulations for federal whistleblowers changed recently making the President's actions eligible for the whistleblower to file a complaint. President Trump and those who spread his message online repeated Graham's claim.


Three more Republican Senator's contacted Inspector General for the Intelligence Community (IGIC) Michael Atkinson for clarification. Graham and Trump focused on first-hand versus second-hand knowledge as a requirement for a valid whistleblower complaint.

Unlike Graham, the Senators made no claim of regulation changes. Instead, GOP Senators Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Mike Lee of Utah and Ron Johnson stated no laws had changed and they were unaware of any requirements for first-hand knowledge by a whistleblower.

But Graham stated on Face the Nation:

"This is a sham as far as I am concerned. I want to know who told the whistleblower about the phone call. I want to know why they changed the rules about whistleblowers not—the hearsay rule was changed just a short period of time before the complaint was filed."

Graham's Sunday TV appearance led the President to tweet:

In his response to committee chairs Grassley, Lee and Johnson, IGIC Atkinson said:

"Although the form requests information about whether the Complainant possesses first-hand knowledge about the matter about which he or she is lodging the complaint, there is no such requirement set forth in the statute."

The official ICIG statement added:

"In fact, by law the Complainant–or any individual in the Intelligence Community who wants to report information with respect to an urgent concern to the congressional intelligence committees–need not possess first-hand information in order to file a complaint or information with respect to an urgent concern."

Since Senator Graham's false claims on Face the Nation, President Trump and his most dedicated followers used the defense that the whistleblower complaint was "fake" because it was a "second-hand description."

However as ICIG Atkinson pointed out, the whistleblower has both first and second-hand knowledge of the urgent national security concern—negating Graham's entire point. Both Trump and Graham focused on whether the whistleblower had the legal ability to file the complaint, not whether the complaint was true and accurate.

Online, people attempted to put Graham's false claims to rest by breaking it all down into easily digestible bites.

Still some people insisted that Graham's claim that three other GOP Senators also disputed as inaccurate was true as well as ignoring, again, that the whistleblower did have first-hand knowledge of some aspects of the complaint.

But why would the ICIG accept second-hand knowledge?

According to federal employee training–unless their first line supervisor is involved in the actions they are reporting–employees follow a chain of command for reporting urgent security concerns. Reports are filed up the chain of command until successful resolution or until a level fails to take appropriate action on the report.

Therefore, those with first-hand knowledge may report a credible urgent concern to their supervisor, then anyone within that chain can file a whistleblower complaint if appropriate actions are not taken by the agency or administration. This process necessitates allowing those with second-hand knowledge to file whistleblower complaints.

Whether President Trump, Senator Graham and the other Trump fans acknowledge or continue to cling to Graham's false claim as a means to exonerate Trump from impeachment remains to be seen.

The book The U.S. Constitution and Other Writings, available here, includes the Constitution and related documents as well as The Federalist Papers, the Articles of Confederacy and texts of important presidential speeches.

*****

Listen to the first season of George Takei's podcast, 'Oh Myyy Pod!' where we explore the racially charged videos that have taken the internet by storm.

Be sure to subscribe here and never miss an episode.

More from People/donald-trump

Screenshot of George Santos; Zohran Mamdani
@MrSantosNY/X; Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

George Santos Announced He's Leaving New York After Mamdani's Win—And The Responses Are Brutal

Disgraced former New York Republican Representative George Santos was widely mocked after he announced he will leave New York City now that Zohran Mamdani has won the mayoral election.

Mamdani has sent shockwaves around the world with his win; an unapologetic democratic socialist, he took on the establishment and won despite months of Islamophobic and racist attacks from the right-wing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of man collapsing and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. preparing to walk out
@atrupar/X

RFK Jr. Dragged For Bolting Out Of Oval Office The Moment A Man Collapsed During Press Briefing

Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was criticized after hurrying out of a press briefing in the Oval Office on Thursday after a man had a medical emergency and suddenly collapsed.

Kennedy was on hand alongside President Donald Trump, Dr. Mehmet Oz—the current Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services—and health aides for a press briefing announcing lower costs for weight loss drugs.

Keep ReadingShow less

Times People Saw Someone Almost Die Due To Their Own Actions

All actions have consequences, some more negative and severe than others.

But sometimes, someone will do something so extreme or stupid, it could almost cost them their life.

Keep ReadingShow less

Cancer Patients Explain Which Symptoms Ultimately Led Them To See A Doctor

Cancer has taken far too many lives and affected far too many people.

Where is a cure?

Keep ReadingShow less
Close-up shot of the number 30 painted on asphalt.
Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

People Over 30 Share Their Biggest Regrets In Life

Life goes by in a flash.

When we're young, we tend to laugh off that statement.

Keep ReadingShow less