Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Fox Guest Ripped For Heartless Response To Arizona Abortion Ruling: 'Not The Worst Thing In The World'

Screenshots of Mark Simone and Larry Kudlow
Fox News

Radio host Mark Simone sparked outrage after dismissing concerns about a new Arizona Supreme Court ruling that would almost completely prohibit abortion in the state.

Conservative radio host Mark Simone sparked outrage after dismissing concerns about a new Arizona Supreme Court ruling that would almost completely ban abortion in the state, saying it is "not the worst thing in the world" if women have to travel out of state for the procedure.

During the discussion, Simone addressed the Court's validation of an 1864 law criminalizing almost all abortions, which would override the state's existing 15-week abortion ban.


Asked by Fox Business host Larry Kudlow about the "tricky business" of prohibiting abortion given that Republicans and Democrats nationwide strongly support the procedure, Simone said:

"It hurts [former President Donald] Trump for a few days and then people start to realize this not the worst thing in the world."

Kudlow pressed further:

"He may come out -- he'll come out against it -- oh no, maybe he won't. Remember his point was the legislature, Mark. He didn't mention the courts, so this is tricky. State supreme court, does that qualify as a state decision?"

To this, Simone responded:

"Yeah, it is to be pro-choice, states can decide. If you had to travel to another state to get an abortion, it's not the worst thing in the world. Hopefully this is a very rare occurrence in your life, once in your life, maybe you would do it."
"Buying a bus ticket to go somewhere to get it is not worst thing in the world."

You can watch their interaction in the video below.

Simone's callous remarks were harshly criticized as many pointed out the obstacles faced by women who are forced to travel out of state for reproductive healthcare.


Arizona's Supreme Court decision, which effectively bans nearly all abortions without exceptions for rape or incest, has ignited widespread debate about reproductive rights and women's healthcare access.

The ruling, put on hold temporarily pending further legal arguments, is expected to have far-reaching implications for the state and potentially influence the upcoming November election. While several polls show Trump currently a few points ahead of President Joe Biden in the state, he and Republicans have faced significant electoral losses since Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022.

While Simone highlighted the option for individuals to travel across state lines to access abortion services, he fails to understand the practical difficulties, including financial burdens and logistical challenges.

The cost of the procedure itself, coupled with additional expenses such as transportation and accommodation, not to mention time off work and childcare, renders this option unfeasible for many individuals, particularly those already facing financial hardship.

This ruling comes as abortion rights groups approach the requisite number of signatures to get a ballot initiative on the November ballot that would enshrine abortion rights into the state constitution, something that is widely seen as a vote driver for Democrats.

More from News

Kate Gosselin
Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images

Kate Gosselin Shares The 'Lasting Effects' Of Having Sextuplets On Her Body—And We Can Only Imagine

TLC programming was a major part of Millennial and Gen-X culture, particularly shows like Teen Mom, Catfish, Jon & Kate Plus 8, and Keeping Up with the Kardashians.

If you were ever curious for a closer glimpse of Kate Gosselin, mother of twins and then sextuplets, and her life, now is your chance!

Keep ReadingShow less
screenshot of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris presidential debate
CNN

Video Of Kamala Warning Trump About Putin's Agenda Goes Viral After Russian Drones Enter Polish Airspace

One year ago, pundits and the press were analyzing the performances of Democratic presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris and former President and MAGA Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in the first and only debate between the pair before the 2024 presidential election.

During that face-off, it was noted that Trump refused to answer if he wanted United States ally Ukraine to win the war Russia began by invading their neighbor.

Keep ReadingShow less
An 87-year-old Gramercy Park man and his wife fought off a pair of watch thieves in a scam gone wrong.
Eyewitness News ABC7NY/YouTube

87-Year-Old Foils Watch Thieves

Who needs another season of Mr. and Mrs. Smith when Gramercy Park’s own Larry Schwartz and Joanna Cuccia are already serving action-comedy gold? At 87, Schwartz casually knocks out 240 reps a day and chases off watch thieves as if it were just another warm-up set.

And Larry Schwartz wasn’t about to let some Rolex-swapping grifter make him the punchline of a TikTok crime wave.

Keep ReadingShow less
Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic
Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images; 20th Century Fox

Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic

If you've ever wondered if legendary Vogue Editor-in-Chief Anna Wintour has ever seen The Devil Wears Prada, the answer is yes, and she's finally shared her opinions on the film.

The movie, based on Lauren Weisberger's novel of the same name, centers around the trials and tribulations a young writer endures under a legendarily icy fashion editor named Miranda Priestley.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Colbert, and crowd giving standing ovation
CBS

Powerful Line From Sotomayor's Scathing Dissent After ICE Ruling Ignites Standing Ovation On 'Colbert'

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor received a standing ovation during her appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert after Colbert read a line from her powerful dissent following the Court's ruling that immigration agents can use racial profiling when conducting arrests.

The case was brought by several individuals detained during ICE raids. A federal district judge initially found the raids unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Keep ReadingShow less