Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Ted Cruz Dragged After His Campaign Spent $153k Buying Up Copies Of His Book To Boost Sales

Ted Cruz Dragged After His Campaign Spent $153k Buying Up Copies Of His Book To Boost Sales
Tom Williams-Pool/Getty Images

Does anyone actually want to buy Texas Republican Senator Ted Cruz's book?

That's one question being asked now that the Texas Republican Senator's financial disclosures are being reviewed.


Recently released findings from the Federal Election Commission (FEC) suggest Cruz's campaign spent $153,000 at Books-a-Million on copies of his book, One Vote Away: How a Single Supreme Court Seat Can Change History, for which he was paid a $320,000 advance by his publisher.

Although the FEC's findings do not explicitly state Cruz's campaign spent money on his book, the timing of the purchases is suspect.

Cruz's book was published on Sept. 29, 2020.

The Cruz committee's 2020 year-end report shows that two weeks later, on October 15, they spent $40,000 on "books." The next week, Cruz's book ranked #9 on the New York Times Bestseller list.

And on October 30, the campaign spent another $11,900 on "books" only for Cruz's book to again appear on the New York Times Bestseller List, this time ranked #5.

The campaign again spent money on "books" on December 1—to the tune of $111,900—but Cruz's book did not make the list that week given it was the same week former President Barack Obama, singer Dolly Parton and actor Michael J. Fox released memoirs.

Cruz reportedly has other ways of pocketing royalties related to the sale of his book .

His Senate website offers autographed copies of his book to anyone who donates $77 to his campaign. It is technically not illegal for United States Senators to buy their own books using campaign funds.

According to an FEC advisory on the matter, the royalties from those purchases must be given to charity:

"A campaign committee may incur costs to promote the candidate's book without violating the ban on personal use of campaign funds because the candidate will donate all royalties to charity."

A spokesman for Cruz said Cruz "has not received one cent of royalties," though they did not specify which books had been purchased.

The government watchdog group Citizens for Ethics in Washington (CREW) is not convinced.


Nor are the denizens of social media, who lambasted the Senator for what they say amounts to corruption.










This isn't the first time Cruz's book made national headlines regarding campaign finance rules.

In May, the Campaign Legal Center (CLC) accused Cruz of breaking the law by illegally promoting his book with campaign funds.

The organization said Cruz spent up to $18,000 in late 2020 on Facebook advertisements including links urging viewers to buy copies of his book from third-party online booksellers.

CLC also addressed Cruz's violations in a letter to the Senate Ethics Committee, arguing:

"when elected officials use campaign contributions to advance their personal bottom lines, they compromise the integrity of the political process and undermine the public's trust that their political contributions are being used legally—for campaign purposes or in connection with the officeholder's duties, not to line the officeholder's pockets."

It went on to say Cruz had "violated core principles of accountable government by using campaign funds to promote the sale of his book."

More from News

Kate Gosselin
Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images

Kate Gosselin Shares The 'Lasting Effects' Of Having Sextuplets On Her Body—And We Can Only Imagine

TLC programming was a major part of Millennial and Gen-X culture, particularly shows like Teen Mom, Catfish, Jon & Kate Plus 8, and Keeping Up with the Kardashians.

If you were ever curious for a closer glimpse of Kate Gosselin, mother of twins and then sextuplets, and her life, now is your chance!

Keep ReadingShow less
screenshot of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris presidential debate
CNN

Video Of Kamala Warning Trump About Putin's Agenda Goes Viral After Russian Drones Enter Polish Airspace

One year ago, pundits and the press were analyzing the performances of Democratic presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris and former President and MAGA Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in the first and only debate between the pair before the 2024 presidential election.

During that face-off, it was noted that Trump refused to answer if he wanted United States ally Ukraine to win the war Russia began by invading their neighbor.

Keep ReadingShow less
An 87-year-old Gramercy Park man and his wife fought off a pair of watch thieves in a scam gone wrong.
Eyewitness News ABC7NY/YouTube

87-Year-Old Foils Watch Thieves

Who needs another season of Mr. and Mrs. Smith when Gramercy Park’s own Larry Schwartz and Joanna Cuccia are already serving action-comedy gold? At 87, Schwartz casually knocks out 240 reps a day and chases off watch thieves as if it were just another warm-up set.

And Larry Schwartz wasn’t about to let some Rolex-swapping grifter make him the punchline of a TikTok crime wave.

Keep ReadingShow less
Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic
Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images; 20th Century Fox

Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic

If you've ever wondered if legendary Vogue Editor-in-Chief Anna Wintour has ever seen The Devil Wears Prada, the answer is yes, and she's finally shared her opinions on the film.

The movie, based on Lauren Weisberger's novel of the same name, centers around the trials and tribulations a young writer endures under a legendarily icy fashion editor named Miranda Priestley.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Colbert, and crowd giving standing ovation
CBS

Powerful Line From Sotomayor's Scathing Dissent After ICE Ruling Ignites Standing Ovation On 'Colbert'

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor received a standing ovation during her appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert after Colbert read a line from her powerful dissent following the Court's ruling that immigration agents can use racial profiling when conducting arrests.

The case was brought by several individuals detained during ICE raids. A federal district judge initially found the raids unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Keep ReadingShow less