Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Bill Barr Throws Trump Under The Bus Over Pro-Trump Judge's Special Master Ruling

Bill Barr Throws Trump Under The Bus Over Pro-Trump Judge's Special Master Ruling
Fox News; Ed Jones/AFP via Getty Images

On Tuesday, former Trump administration Attorney General Bill Barr told Fox News he disagreed with a federal judge's ruling to appoint a special master to review records the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) seized in August from his former boss' Florida home turned resort.

Mar-a-Lago—former Republican President Donald Trump's current residence of record—was searched by the FBI in conjunction with a complaint filed with the Department of Justice (DoJ) by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).


In responce, Trump’s lawyers filed a motion asking for a special master to examine all documents seized by the FBI. The request came well after the documents were reviewed and inventoried.

You can hear Barr's view on the request and ruling below:

Barr said:

"The opinion, I think, was wrong, and I think the government should appeal it."
"It's deeply flawed in a number of ways."

Trump’s former Attorney General continued:

"I don't think the appointment of a special master is going to hold up, but even if it does, I don't see it fundamentally changing the trajectory."
"I think the fundamental dynamics of the case are set."
"Which is the government has very strong evidence of what it really needs to determine whether charges are appropriate, which is government tax documents were taken, classified information was taken and not handled appropriately."
"And they are looking into and there's some evidence to suggest that they were deceived."

Barr added:

"And none of that really relates to the content of documents."
"It relates to the fact that there were documents there and the fact that they were classified and the fact that they were subpoenaed and never delivered."
"But they don't have to show the content, you know, the specific advice given in a memo, for example, in order to prevail in this case."
"So I think it's not really going to change the decision."

While many concurred with Barr's take...







...they weren't ready to forget his enabling of Trump while he was AG.




Barr was the subject of heavy criticism while serving as Trump's Attorney General from 2019 until his resignation at the end of 2020.

The DoJ under Barr was accused of being complicit in unethical and potentially illegal activities by Trump and members of his administration and his family.

AG Barr's resignation came after Trump's loss of the popular and electoral vote to Democratic candidate Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election. Investigations into the January 6 Capitol riot found Trump was involved in discussions with members of Congress, his administration and right-wing organization leaders about ways to overturn Trump's election loss in December of 2020.

The weeks leading up to Barr's resignation were filled with public clashes between Trump and his AG. Many revolved around Barr's refusal to perpetuate or support Trump's Big Lie about his 2020 election loss.

Barr and his DoJ made several statements that there was no evidence of widespread voter fraud nor anything to support Trump being the rightful winner.

More from News

Kate Gosselin
Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images

Kate Gosselin Shares The 'Lasting Effects' Of Having Sextuplets On Her Body—And We Can Only Imagine

TLC programming was a major part of Millennial and Gen-X culture, particularly shows like Teen Mom, Catfish, Jon & Kate Plus 8, and Keeping Up with the Kardashians.

If you were ever curious for a closer glimpse of Kate Gosselin, mother of twins and then sextuplets, and her life, now is your chance!

Keep ReadingShow less
screenshot of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris presidential debate
CNN

Video Of Kamala Warning Trump About Putin's Agenda Goes Viral After Russian Drones Enter Polish Airspace

One year ago, pundits and the press were analyzing the performances of Democratic presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris and former President and MAGA Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in the first and only debate between the pair before the 2024 presidential election.

During that face-off, it was noted that Trump refused to answer if he wanted United States ally Ukraine to win the war Russia began by invading their neighbor.

Keep ReadingShow less
An 87-year-old Gramercy Park man and his wife fought off a pair of watch thieves in a scam gone wrong.
Eyewitness News ABC7NY/YouTube

87-Year-Old Foils Watch Thieves

Who needs another season of Mr. and Mrs. Smith when Gramercy Park’s own Larry Schwartz and Joanna Cuccia are already serving action-comedy gold? At 87, Schwartz casually knocks out 240 reps a day and chases off watch thieves as if it were just another warm-up set.

And Larry Schwartz wasn’t about to let some Rolex-swapping grifter make him the punchline of a TikTok crime wave.

Keep ReadingShow less
Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic
Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images; 20th Century Fox

Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic

If you've ever wondered if legendary Vogue Editor-in-Chief Anna Wintour has ever seen The Devil Wears Prada, the answer is yes, and she's finally shared her opinions on the film.

The movie, based on Lauren Weisberger's novel of the same name, centers around the trials and tribulations a young writer endures under a legendarily icy fashion editor named Miranda Priestley.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Colbert, and crowd giving standing ovation
CBS

Powerful Line From Sotomayor's Scathing Dissent After ICE Ruling Ignites Standing Ovation On 'Colbert'

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor received a standing ovation during her appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert after Colbert read a line from her powerful dissent following the Court's ruling that immigration agents can use racial profiling when conducting arrests.

The case was brought by several individuals detained during ICE raids. A federal district judge initially found the raids unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Keep ReadingShow less