TikTok Defends Guy Who Didn't Give Up Final Spot On Formula 1 Test Drive Ride For Crying Kid

A video on TikTok has gone viral after the creator documented his refusal to let a crying child take the final spot on a Formula 1 test drive in his place... and viewers are defending him by the numbers.

The video - which has been viewed 10.5 million times already - is only six seconds long, but it has everything you need to know.

It begins with the creator @myrightmiddletoe standing in line for the F1 simulation car and displays the text, "When they say you're the last one able to ride today and you deny the little kid behind you asking to trade places."

The camera then panned to the line which consisted of two young children. He panned the camera back to the front of the line which had a sign that explained the exhibit closed at 4:55 and that patrons should "please consider this when joining the queue."

The video went back to the line which showed one of the children appearing to be crying to an adult male figure before it cut back to the creator who smiled from the test drive car, hands on the wheel.

@myrightmiddletoe captioned the video:

"As soon as this happened, this sound came to my mind to use."

The sound, which is the soundtrack to the video, is of a person laughing and then saying, "Girl, f**k them kids and f**k you, too."

You can watch the six-second creation below.

Many viewers of the TikTok supported his decision, many claiming they would have done the same.

@myrightmiddletoe/TikTok

@myrightmiddletoe/TikTok

Another even noticed the adult smiling at the situation.

@myrightmiddletoe/TikTok

Several noted that the child learned an important lesson about not always getting what she wants as well as about accepting undesirable outcomes of situations.

@myrightmiddletoe/TikTok

@myrightmiddletoe/TikTok

@myrightmiddletoe/TikTok

@myrightmiddletoe/TikTok

@myrightmiddletoe/TikTok

@myrightmiddletoe/TikTok

@myrightmiddletoe/TikTok

@myrightmiddletoe/TikTok

On his TikTok profile, @myrightmiddletoe's identity is "Loser," but we'd disagree in this case.