Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Things Get Awkward When Trump Official Is Asked if Harris Can Overturn 2024 Election if Biden Loses

Things Get Awkward When Trump Official Is Asked if Harris Can Overturn 2024 Election if Biden Loses

Even before a mob of pro-Trump extremists stormed the United States Capitol in a deadly failed insurrection, January 6 of last year was to be a monumental day. For those who didn't fall for Trump's conspiracy theories about the 2020 election, it marked the end of a long, bitter campaign and increasingly unhinged lame duck period. The newly-sworn in 117th Congress, led by then-Vice President Mike Pence, would convene for a joint congressional session to count the certified electoral votes and nationally acknowledge President-elect Joe Biden's victory. The uninterrupted American tradition of a peaceful transfer of power would remain unblemished.


For Trump and his allies, it was the final opportunity to steal the presidency.

After court cases, audits, and pressure on election officials failed to secure Trump a second term, the administration hatched a new plan. Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, reportedly led Republicans in a number of swing states to baselessly declare themselves electors and send forged electoral certificates for Trump to the National Archives. As Trump lawyer John Eastman laid out in an infamous memo, Pence could then claim there were dueling slates of electors and therefore, those states' votes would be thrown out and new electors appointed by their GOP-controlled state legislatures who would appoint pro-Trump electors.

Thankfully, Pence—despite a public pressure campaign by Trump—didn't comply with the deranged plot. After news of his refusal broke, pro-Trump rioters stormed the Capitol and called for Pence's execution.

In the year since, Trump's scheme has led Congress to launch bipartisan efforts clarifying the Electoral Count Act, erasing any room for doubt that the Vice President cannot unilaterally decide the results of a presidential election.

But these reform efforts have now led Trump to lie that he was right all along. He continues to insist the Vice President can singularly cancel millions of votes, writing in a statement this past week:

"Mike Pence said he had no authority other than to send the votes forward to the Old Crow, Mitch McConnell. If so, why are the Dems and RINOs fighting so hard to make it impossible for a VP to do so in the future?"

So the obvious question is, if Trump and his allies think a Vice President can declare the winner, would they acquiesce to current Vice President Kamala Harris declaring a Biden victory after the 2024 election, even if the Democrats lose?

Trump's former trade advisor Peter Navarro, who has admitted to helping orchestrate the electoral scheme, was the unlucky Trump sycophant tasked with answering that question in a recent interview with MSNBC's Ari Melber.

Watch below.

When asked if the call would ultimately belong to Vice President Harris, regardless of the results, Navarro responded:

"See, you misconstrue the whole Green Bay Sweep plan. It's not for the Vice President to determine who wins, okay? The only thing that Pence had the authority to do is go back to the states and let the states look at the votes. It's the states in our Constitution who have the right to decide who won an election in the states."

The states had decided. Multiple times. First on election day, then again after audits of a substantial portion of those ballots, then again when the legitimate electors cast and certified their electoral ballots.

But under Navarro's plan, the electoral votes would be sent back to swing states that Trump lost but which had Republican-controlled legislatures. The state legislatures would steal the election by appointing pro-Trump electors, despite the will of the state's voters.

Melber continued to press Navarro on this plot, asking:

"Under your contention, Vice President Harris could take any states that her side lost and selectively send those back. That's your current contention?"

Navarro continued to stammer, but refused to deliver a yes or no answer.

The exchange got social media users talking.






People think they knew Navarro's real answer.



Oof.

More from News

Donald Trump holding photos of White House ballroom
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

CNN Just Used A Hilarious Poll To Show Just How Unpopular Trump's Ballroom Is—And We're Cackling

After President Donald Trump claimed that his new White House ballroom is "very popular" with the American public, CNN shared a hilariously shady poll that gets to the truth of the matter.

Last year, Trump ordered the demolition of the entire East Wing to make way for a 90,000 square-foot ballroom that will dwarf the size of the White House itself, sparking alarm from historical preservationists and the public alike.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @devynnehaddoxx's TikTok video
@devynnehaddoxx/TikTok

Woman In Labor Times How Long Her Husband Takes To Poop To See If She Can Push Their Baby Out Faster In Hilarious Viral Video

It's well-known across the internet that it takes forever for men to use the restroom. For dads especially, in the time it takes them to poop, when they return to the house, their kids will have aged seven years, and their baby will have learned to walk.

These are jokes, of course, but it's an internet consensus that men spend a really long time on the porcelain throne.

Keep ReadingShow less
David Letterman (left) has continued defending Stephen Colbert (right) as CBS faces backlash over canceling The Late Show.
Kevin Winter/Getty Images; Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images

David Letterman Rips 'Lying Weasels' At CBS For Claiming Colbert Was Canceled For Financial Reasons In Epic Takedown

David Letterman isn’t staying quiet about CBS canceling The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. As Colbert’s run comes to an end later this month, the former late-night host is publicly challenging the network’s claim that the decision was purely financial.

Letterman, who hosted The Late Show from 1993 until stepping down in 2015, addressed the controversy during a new interview with New York Times journalist Jason Zinoman.

Keep ReadingShow less
Antonia Eastwood; Gemma Monk
Antonia Eastwood/MSN; Cover Images

Woman Speaks Out After Prison Sentence To Reveal What Led Her To Hurl Black Paint At Sister-In-Law On Her Wedding Day

In early 2024, 49-year-old Antonia Eastwood married Ashley Monk after about five months of dating. During the ceremony, Antonia tripped while walking down the aisle.

Antonia and Ashley were both suspicious that she did not trip accidentally and that Ashley's sister, Gemma, actually tripped her. Gemma and Antonia were not close, and the couple also believed that Gemma might be jealous that they were marrying after five months, though she'd been with her childhood sweetheart for 20 years without tying the knot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Billie Eilish on 'Good Hang'
Good Hang with Amy Poehler/YouTube

Billie Eilish's Refreshingly Blunt Take On Aging And 'Botched' Plastic Surgery Has Fans Nodding Hard

You know what they say: the grass is greener on the other side. Most people want something that they don't have.

While many people right now are fixated on appearing younger than their age, Billie Eilish—who already looks younger than her age—is looking forward to what comes next.

Keep ReadingShow less