Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

The Library of Congress Just Changed Its Twitter Archiving Policy and We Can't Say We Blame Them

The Library of Congress Just Changed Its Twitter Archiving Policy and We Can't Say We Blame Them
Jurgen Vogt/Getty Images

Library of Congress declines to continue archiving all tweets.

If you haven’t gotten around to setting up your Twitter account yet, you might have missed your chance to have your tweets immortalized in the Library of Congress. The Library announced that beginning January 1, 2018, it will no longer archive every public tweet posted to Twitter.

In 2010, the Library of Congress announced its acquisition of a groundbreaking gift from Twitter—the entire archive of public tweets, beginning with the first tweets of 2006 through 2010.


For your trivia night pursuits, the very first tweet was on March 21, 2006, from Twitter’s C.E.O. Jack Dorsey. The text: “just setting up my twttr.”

[embed]

[/embed]

Since that initial tweet, the site has grown exponentially and overwhelmingly. The library does not say how many tweets it currently has in its collection, but in 2013 it said it had already collected and archived 170 billion tweets, at a rate of about 500,000 tweets per day. Today, there are about 6,000 public tweets posted every second. While the library does not include private and deleted tweets, or images and embedded videos, that is still a lot of tweets.

So many that it became just too much for the library. It became more and more difficult for the library to archive the amount of data, and it became increasingly wary of the utility of the collection of text-only tweets as the medium became increasingly visual. “[T]he social media landscape has changed significantly” since 2010, the library wrote in a press release, “with new platforms, an explosion in use, terms of service and functionality shifting frequently and lessons learned about privacy and other concerns.”

The library took a decidedly “it’s not you, it’s me” approach to the decision to end the wholesale archive of tweets. “The Twitter Archive may prove to be one of this generation’s most significant legacies to future generations. Future generations will learn much about this rich period in our history, the information flows, and social and political forces that help define the current generation.”

And yet, the library is decidedly “quitting Twitter”: “Effective January 1, 2018, the Library will acquire tweets on a selective basis—similar to our collection of web sites,” the library wrote.

The last 12 years of tweets will continue to be preserved, although the library still has not figured out how to make the archive public.

The tweets collected and archived will be “thematic and event-based, including events such as elections, or themes of ongoing national interest, e.g., public policy.”

Does that mean that the collection will continue to be representative of what Twitter, for all its information flow and generation-defining forces, actually is? Under the library’s selective curation process, would the most retweeted tweet of 2017, a plea for retweets to secure a year’s worth of chicken nuggets, ever make it into the library’s collection?  

[embed]

[/embed]

And if it doesn’t, is that necessarily a bad thing?

More from News

Screenshots from @mike.ali32's TikTok video
@mike.ali32/TikTok

TikToker Goes Viral For Yelling Out Fast Food Slogans After Buying Their Food—And The Reactions Are Priceless

We're supposed to go through life loving the people that we love so loudly that they can never doubt how much we love them. Maybe that's how we should approach the things and companies we love, too.

At least, that seems to be the approach that TikToker @mike.ali32 is taking.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @withethanlap's TikTok video
@withethanlap/TikTok

Guy Turns His Pregnant Wife's Extreme Text Messages Into A Hilariously Perfect Pop Punk Song—And It's A Banger

Anyone who has gone through pregnancy or is close to someone who has knows that the symptoms are truly no joke, and going from one day to the next can feel like an absolute rollercoaster.

Comedian and TikToker Ethan Lapierre's wife shared with him some of her symptoms, sometimes texting him that she was hungry but couldn't eat, and other times feeling like she was dying.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @missyhalleonig's TikTok video
@missyhalleonig/TikTok

A New Parenting Hack For Getting Toddlers To Stop Their Tantrums Has People In Disbelief That It Actually Kinda Works

Parents might not want to admit it, but when their toddlers are tantruming, there's nothing quite like finding a way to hilariously redirect or confuse them to help stop the tears.

In a hilarious parenting hack that's taking over TikTok, videos are appearing that all mysteriously star a woman named "Jessica," though no one can seem to find her.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @legallyswifite13's TikTok video
@legallyswifite13/TikTok

Woman Sparks Debate After Accusing Frontier Airlines Of Kicking Her Off Flight For Being Deaf

Let this Frontier Airlines saga be a reminder to all of us that not all disabilities and needs are visible, so when a person requests accommodations, it's better to believe them.

TikToker @legallyswiftie13 posted in 2024 that, though she was in her early twenties, she discovered that she would be rapidly losing her hearing, which was discovered at a routine medical check-up. Though she could still speak and hear, it would become increasingly difficult for her to hear, especially when there were competing noises in the area.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ben Sasse
60 Minutes/CBS News

Former GOP Senator Gets Brutal Wakeup Call After Criticizing People For Playing 'Candy Crush' Instead Of 'Making Babies'

Ben Sasse represented Nebraska in the United States Senate from 2015 to 2023. As a Midwestern moderate, the sometimes controversial Sasse was often critical of MAGA Republican President Donald Trump on social media and on the Senate floor.

At one point, the Nebraska GOP censured him because of his criticism of Trump. But Sasse, like Maine Republican Senator Susan Collins, would still vote with the majority of his party when his vote was needed to back Trump's agenda.

Keep ReadingShow less