Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Judge Threatens To 'Imprison' Trump For Blatantly Defying Gag Order

Arthur Engoron; Donald Trump
Andrew Kelly/Pool/Getty Images; Spencer Platt/Getty Images

After Trump defied Judge Engoron's limited gag order prohibiting him from posting about officers of his court, Judge Engoron suggested 'serious sanctions, including financial and/or possibly imprisoning him.'

After former President Donald Trump defied Justice Arthur Engoron's limited gag order prohibiting him from posting about officers of his court, Engoron suggested "serious sanctions, including financial and/or possibly imprisoning him."

Engoron, who presides over Trump's civil bank fraud trial in New York, stated that inflammatory comments have, in some cases, led to severe "physical harm and worse." The judge insisted that Trump's legal team needed to provide an explanation for this direct violation of the gag order, and why it should not result in substantial sanctions.


He said:

“In the current overheated climate, incendiary comments can and in some cases already has, led to serious physical harm and worse. I will now allow the defendants to explain why this blatant violation of the gag order would not result in serious sanctions, including financial sanctions and/or possibly imprisoning him."

Trump's defense lawyer, Christopher Kise, promptly apologized for Trump's actions. Kise attributed the violation to the expansive "campaign machinery" of the 2024 Republican presidential candidate. He claimed that it was an oversight that they had failed to remove a webpage that mirrored a Truth Social post, which Trump had previously deleted.

The post in question had indeed been deleted but remained up on Trump's official website, DonaldJTrump.com. In it, he attacked Engoron's principal law clerk, whom he accused of being the "girlfriend" of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and "running this case against me."

He added:

"How disgraceful! This case should be dismissed immediately!!"

You can see the post below.

Screenshot of Donald Trump's Truth Social post, featured on DonaldJTrump.comDonaldJTrump.com

However, the judge was not quick to accept this explanation, reminding them that Trump remains ultimately responsible for his extensive operations.

Engoron recounted the events leading up to the reprimand, emphasizing the "untrue disparaging and personally-identifying post about my principal law clerk." He disclosed his off-the-record conversation with the defendants, in which he ordered the removal of the post.

Trump assured him that the post had been taken down. However, Engoron later discovered that the offending content had remained on Trump's website for over two weeks, which had been brought to light by reporting by Meidas Touch.

It was only removed, Engoron noted, following an email from the court.

Engoron said:

“I spoke to defendants on and off the record. Off the record, I ordered Donald Trump to remove the post immediately. Approximately 10 minutes later, Donald Trump represented to me that he had taken down the offending post."
“I then, on the record, imposed on all parties to his action a very limited gag order forbidding ‘all parties from posting, emailing or speaking publicly about any members of my staff,’ emphasizing quite clearly that ‘personal attacks on members of my court staff are unacceptable, inappropriate and I will not tolerate them under any circumstances."

Many seconded the judge's suggestion that Trump be imprisoned.







Judges overseeing Trump's trials have attempted to curb Trump's verbal attacks.

Trump was widely mocked after he said he is "willing to go a jail" after U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan imposed a gag order on him for repeatedly attacking her and federal prosecutors and falsely accusing them of working at President Joe Biden's behest.

Previously, Trump had said on his social media platform Truth Social that he would “appeal” the gag order ruling, referring to it as a "witch hunt." He made this claim in spite of analysis from legal experts who've said his efforts would prove unsuccessful.

Chutkan's order stressed that "First Amendment protections yield to the administration of justice and to the protection of witnesses" and said Trump's status as a 2024 presidential candidate "does not give him carte blanche to vilify … public servants who are simply doing their job.”

Her order raises the possibility that Trump might encounter consequences, including limitations on his use of social media, and even the potential for pretrial detention if he persists in launching public criticisms against Special Counsel Jack Smith and his legal team, or probable witnesses expected to appear in his trial scheduled for March.

Judge Engoron's final ruling on sanctions against Trump were expected Friday afternoon.

UPDATE: Judge Engoron has fined Trump $5,000 with potentially harsher sanctions to come for future violations of the gag order.

More from People/donald-trump

Kate Gosselin
Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images

Kate Gosselin Shares The 'Lasting Effects' Of Having Sextuplets On Her Body—And We Can Only Imagine

TLC programming was a major part of Millennial and Gen-X culture, particularly shows like Teen Mom, Catfish, Jon & Kate Plus 8, and Keeping Up with the Kardashians.

If you were ever curious for a closer glimpse of Kate Gosselin, mother of twins and then sextuplets, and her life, now is your chance!

Keep ReadingShow less
screenshot of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris presidential debate
CNN

Video Of Kamala Warning Trump About Putin's Agenda Goes Viral After Russian Drones Enter Polish Airspace

One year ago, pundits and the press were analyzing the performances of Democratic presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris and former President and MAGA Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in the first and only debate between the pair before the 2024 presidential election.

During that face-off, it was noted that Trump refused to answer if he wanted United States ally Ukraine to win the war Russia began by invading their neighbor.

Keep ReadingShow less
An 87-year-old Gramercy Park man and his wife fought off a pair of watch thieves in a scam gone wrong.
Eyewitness News ABC7NY/YouTube

87-Year-Old Foils Watch Thieves

Who needs another season of Mr. and Mrs. Smith when Gramercy Park’s own Larry Schwartz and Joanna Cuccia are already serving action-comedy gold? At 87, Schwartz casually knocks out 240 reps a day and chases off watch thieves as if it were just another warm-up set.

And Larry Schwartz wasn’t about to let some Rolex-swapping grifter make him the punchline of a TikTok crime wave.

Keep ReadingShow less
Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic
Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images; 20th Century Fox

Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic

If you've ever wondered if legendary Vogue Editor-in-Chief Anna Wintour has ever seen The Devil Wears Prada, the answer is yes, and she's finally shared her opinions on the film.

The movie, based on Lauren Weisberger's novel of the same name, centers around the trials and tribulations a young writer endures under a legendarily icy fashion editor named Miranda Priestley.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Colbert, and crowd giving standing ovation
CBS

Powerful Line From Sotomayor's Scathing Dissent After ICE Ruling Ignites Standing Ovation On 'Colbert'

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor received a standing ovation during her appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert after Colbert read a line from her powerful dissent following the Court's ruling that immigration agents can use racial profiling when conducting arrests.

The case was brought by several individuals detained during ICE raids. A federal district judge initially found the raids unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Keep ReadingShow less