Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Cute Aggression Study Explains Why We Just Want To Squeeze Adorable Little Animals So Hard 😁

Cute Aggression Study Explains Why We Just Want To Squeeze Adorable Little Animals So Hard 😁
Getty Images

Many of our social media feeds are inundated with pictures and videos of animals being cute. If you're anything like me, you purposely seek these adorable creatures out. However, sometimes their cuteness is almost too much to bear. That sensation is often called "cute aggression"


Sometimes we find a creature so darn cute that we want to squeeze it.

The idea of squeezing something that we love at first sight is a little off-putting and seems completely opposite to our feelings toward the creature.

Because of this confusion, scientists set out to find out just what happens in our brains when we experience "cute aggression", an urge they defined as:

"to squeeze, crush or bite cute things, albeit without any desire to cause harm."

The researchers from University of California, Riverside who wrote the paper on the study said,

"Most of the feelings for cute aggression can be viewed as contradictory, such as in the event of receiving a new puppy and simultaneously crying and smiling."

The study included 20 males participants and 34 female participants. The volunteers were shown numerous images of animals and babies of varying cuteness. As they viewed the images their brain signals were monitored and they were also extensively surveyed on their feelings of "cuteness".

The study showed that greater brain activity, especially the areas tied to emotion, was experienced when participants viewed cuter animals. Furthermore, the cuter a participant found an image, the more activity their brain had in its reward center.

One of the researchers, Katherine Stavropoulos, spoke about their findings.

"It's not just reward and it's not just emotion. Both systems in the brain are involved in this experience of cute aggression."

But why do we react with both reward and emotion?

According to Stavropoulos, it might be an evolutionary trait.

"[I]f you find yourself incapacitated by how cute a baby is—so much so that you simply can't take care of it—that baby is going to starve."

She continued to explain.

"Cute aggression may serve as a tempering mechanism that allows us to function and actually take care of something we might first perceive as overwhelmingly cute."

Many people are glad to know that their "cute aggression" is not a sign of something more disturbing.







Finally, people feel comfortable divulging their own "cute aggression".




Researchers are hoping that this study can lead to studies on how mental disorders, like postpartum depression, affect an individual's experience with "cute aggression".

More from Trending

Jasmine Crockett Calls Out Trump's Hypocrisy By Pointing Out How Melania Got Her Visa
Leigh Vogel/Getty Images for SiriusXM; Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images

Jasmine Crockett Calls Out Trump's Hypocrisy By Pointing Out How Melania Got Her Visa

Texas Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett pointed out President Donald Trump's hypocrisy on immigration considering how First Lady Melania Trump's pathway to citizenship was possible because she received an "Einstein visa," which is usually reserved for an individual with "some sort of significant achievement."

Speaking during a House Judiciary Committee hearing titled “Restoring Integrity and Security to the Visa Process,” Crockett noted that “the idea that Trump and my Republican colleagues want to restore integrity and security in the visa process is actually a joke," and harshly criticized the Trump administration's immigration crackdown and visa restrictions.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Jennifer Griffin and Pete Hegseth
The Hill

Fox Host Comes To Reporter's Defense After Pete Hegseth Berates Her At Pentagon Briefing

Fox News' chief political analyst Brit Hume came to the defense of Fox national security reporter Jennifer Griffin after their former colleague, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, criticized Griffin as the reporter "who misrepresents the most intentionally what the president says” in a Pentagon news conference.

Hegseth, a former Fox News anchor, had criticized media outlets—including his former network—for what he described as unpatriotic reporting. Hegseth took particular aim at early intelligence assessments suggesting that President Donald Trump's bombing of Iran may not have significantly crippled Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

Keep ReadingShow less

Teachers Share The Questions Students Asked In Class That Broke Their Hearts

Being a teacher is a calling.

It is not for the meek or weak of heart.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Emily Compagno
Fox News

Fox Host Slams Dem For Dropping An F-Bomb After Praising Trump For The Same Thing Just Minutes Earlier

Fox News host Emily Compagno was criticized after she praised Donald Trump's use of the "f-bomb" earlier this week before condemning Texas Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett's use of the same word—on the same episode of her show, no less.

Trump made headlines this week after admonishing Israel and Iran for violating a ceasefire agreement he'd announced on Truth Social. Although he claimed the ceasefire had been "agreed upon," Iran fired at least six missile barrages at Israel after it was supposed to take effect.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ken Jennings; Emily Croke
@Jeopardy/Instagram

Champ's Wild Final Jeopardy Connection

In a dramatic conclusion on last Monday’s Jeopardy!, a contestant revealed a surprising relationship to the final clue's answer. Hailing from Denver, Emily Croke made it to the final write-in portion of the game show with $12,200 in earnings.

In the category of “Collections,” host Ken Jennings read the clue:

Keep ReadingShow less