Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Is Chuck Schumer Finally Playing Hardball?

Is Chuck Schumer Finally Playing Hardball?
Alex Wong/Getty Images

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) must thread two very fine political needles in the next few weeks. First, he has to keep the heat on a group of bipartisan senators whose compromise on a $1.2 trillion "hard" infrastructure bill is now stalled over how to pay for it and somehow guide them to a 60-vote, filibuster-proof consensus.

Second, he has to line up all 50 Senate Democrats behind a "soft" infrastructure bill three times the size of the hard bill and keep moderate and progressive Democrats from bolting over provisions or terms they dislike.


Add to this the problem that President Biden (along with Speaker Pelosi) has insisted that the two bills proceed in tandem without one being offered up in the absence of the other. What this means, effectively, is that whenever Schumer pushes for action on one, he is in effect pushing for action on both. This unprecedented juggling act—all balanced on what feels like a legislative tightrope—will demand his full attention well into August.

Schumer seems determined to press forward and crank the heat.

Just yesterday, the temperature shot higher as Schumer announced that he planned to press ahead for preliminary procedural votes on both bills sometime next week. Some centrist senators crafting the hard infrastructure bill are now worried that the mechanisms to fund the cost of the bill—including, most notably, increased enforcement by the IRS against tax cheats—could lead to harassment of deadbeat taxpayers by the IRS, particularly wealthier ones.

Appealing as that sounds, it doesn't sit well with many in the GOP, who mistrust anything that feels like government overreach. But so long as they are unwilling to raise any new taxes, they also know that "uncollected taxes" is about the only well that has any water left.

Senator Rob Portman (R-OH), who is part of the committee working on the infrastructure deal, apparently doesn't like the fuel Schumer has now added, brushing off the Majority Leader's threats by saying he won't vote to advance a bill that isn't ready.

"I'm not going to vote yes if we don't have a product ... We're going to get it right," Portman stated. But Schumer apparently wasn't having it either. "There is no reason why we can't start voting next Wednesday. That's what we're going to do," he told reporters. It's a game of political chicken, and we'll see which side swerves away first.

The threat of holding an early procedural vote also puts additional pressure on wayward Democratic senators to come forth with whatever real objections they might have to the $3.5 trillion soft infrastructure bill proceeding alongside the hard bill. Despite President Joe Biden receiving multiple standing ovations from Senate Democrats when he met with them about the bill, some later expressed concerns about its provisions.

One key skeptic is Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) who already has expressed his displeasure over the bill's treatment of fossil fuels, including coal which holds a special place in his home state's culture and history (even if it is no longer a big employer there). Manchin told CNN that he is "very, very disturbed" by provisions in the bill that he believes would eliminate fossil fuels.

He added:

"[I]f you're sticking your head in the sand, and saying that fossil [fuel] has to be eliminated in America, and they want to get rid of it, and thinking that's going to clean up the global climate, it won't clean it up all. If anything, it would be worse."

But removal of those climate provisions could doom the bill in the eyes of more progressive senators who have pressed for the need for dramatic action on the climate and don't want to let Manchin dictate the terms of their surrender.

Other progressives have indicated that any bill that doesn't address the needs of ordinary Americans won't pass muster. "The devil is still in the details," said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT). He added, however, that Biden "made a really compelling case for both packages." Majority Leader Schumer, presumably with the help of the White House, will need to placate all sides and keep support for the bill unwavering, knowing that a single departure could sink it.

Another test will come when it becomes clear that not a single GOP Senator will vote in favor of the larger bill, as Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has already indicated, but some may be so incensed—by, for example, the increase of taxes on corporations to 25 percent or the attempted addition of paths to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants—that they try to hold the hard infrastructure bill hostage. Without at least 10 moderate GOP senators backing it, the bill cannot survive a filibuster from the right.

But McConnell likely knows that the smaller bill could proceed anyway under the same budget reconciliation rules the Democrats are using for the larger one, and any attempted torpedoing of the bill by the GOP would give the Democrats the added political weapon of claiming the GOP once again did nothing to help America, not even fix its crumbling roads and clogged waterways.

Sen. Chuck Schumer will have all of this in mind as he puts his foot on the accelerator next week on both bills. It is clear, however, that he is now in the driver's seat and will need to show his true maneuvering skills.

More from News

Donald Trump
Alex Wong/Getty Images

Trump Just Tried To Claim He Spoke To A 'Former President' About Iran—But There's One Big Problem

MAGA Republican President Donald Trump isn't helping his handlers refute observations of his signs of dementia or overall cognitive decline.

According to the United Kingdom's The Independent, the POTUS told the press at least three times on Monday that one of his predecessors told him they wished they had launched an unprovoked attack on Iran just like Trump did.

Keep ReadingShow less
Candace Owens; Meghan McCain
Jason Davis/Getty Images; Roy Rochlin/Getty Images

Candace Owens Posts Screenshot Of Charlie Kirk's NSFW Dig At Meghan McCain—And Get Out The Popcorn

Conservative mouthpieces Candace Owens and Meghan McCain are feuding over the late far-right activist Charlie Kirk, and things got really messy after Owens shared one of Kirk's alleged text messages to her.

Kirk was assassinated in September while speaking at an event in Utah. In the months since, Owens has distanced herself from many figures on the far right, accusing them of exploiting his legacy—at times even sharing private communications she had with him.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Donald Trump; Joe Kent
@atrupar/X; Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Trump Just Responded To Top Counterterrorism Official's Damning Resignation Letter In Peak Trump Fashion

President Donald Trump was criticized for his response to the resignation of National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent over the war in Iran, saying the country "posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby."

Kent, a former Green Beret and political candidate with ties to right-wing extremists, was confirmed last July in a 52–44 vote to lead the National Counterterrorism Center, where he oversaw efforts to analyze and detect terrorist threats.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Jennifer Siebel Newsom; Donald Trump
@jennifersiebelnewsom/Instagram; Nathan Howard/Getty Images

Gavin Newsom's Wife Claps Back Hard In Viral Video After Trump Mocks Newsom's Learning Disability

Jennifer Siebel Newsom—the wife of California Governor Gavin Newsom—criticized President Donald Trump after he claimed her husband's dyslexia should disqualify him from being president, calling Trump's comments "extremely ignorant and offensive."

Newsom has frequently spoken about living with dyslexia, a common learning disability that can make reading more difficult and affect spelling and speech. He has said he prefers not to rely on teleprompters because of the condition, and wrote in a recent memoir that, when he was younger, he overcompensated by memorizing “pretentious words.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Sarah Michelle Gellar announced the news of Hulu's cancellation of the Buffy the Vampire Slayer revival.
XNY/Star Max/GC Images

Gellar reveals reason for Buffy reboot ax

Sarah Michelle Gellar is finally pulling back the curtain on why Buffy the Vampire Slayer’s planned return was abruptly shut down—and the explanation is raising eyebrows.

In a new interview with People, Gellar pointed to a single Hulu executive who, she claims, simply didn’t like the original series, effectively halting the planned continuation show Buffy: New Sunnydale in its tracks—an ending that feels less like a heroic finale and more like a stake through a vampire’s heart.

Keep ReadingShow less