Christina Ricci is speaking out against the film Academy's decision to review Andrea Riseborough's Best Actress nomination.
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced they would be reviewing Riseborough's nomination for her performance in the indie film To Leslie after the British actress' grassroots campaigning–which led to the nomination–raised concerns.
The Yellowjackets actress ripped the "elitist" Academy on Instagram but later deleted the comment.
"Seems hilarious that the 'surprise nomination' (meaning tons of money wasn't spent to position this actress) of a legitimately brilliant performance is being met with an investigation."
"So it's only the films and actors that can afford the campaigns that deserve recognition?"
"Feels elitist and exclusive and frankly very backward to me. And I'm sure [Riseborough] had nothing to do with the campaigning."
Ricci finished:
"These things aren't controlled or decided by the actors themselves and yet now her nomination will be tainted by this. And if it's taken away shame on them."
\u201cHow do we feel about Christina Ricci\u2019s take on this #AndreaRiseborough controversy?\u201d— not lindsay lohan (@not lindsay lohan) 1674865745
To Leslie received an outpouring of recognition on social media from A-listers such as Kate Winslet, Cate Blanchett, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Edward Norton, effectively promoting Riseborough's performance and subsequently scoring her a nomination, which starkly contrasted with studios' traditional campaign efforts (i.e. word of mouth versus $$).
At the top of her Critics Choice speech, Cate Blanchett shouts out TO LESLIE star Andrea Riseborough… pic.twitter.com/Wrdm13mEv4
— Kyle Buchanan (@kylebuchanan) January 16, 2023
\u201cAmazing performance by Andrea Riseborough in #ToLeslie. Such authentic, moment-to-moment work I thought that was who she is! \nDirector Michael Morris made a great character-driven film #ToLeslieFilm #ShotOnFilm\n#AndreaRiseborough\n#BestActress\nW/ @AllisonBJanney @marcmaron\u201d— Frances Fisher (@Frances Fisher) 1672436527
Several on social media agreed with Ricci: campaigning is campaigning regardless of funds and/or the people doing the promoting.
I don’t really see the issue cause what’s the difference between campaigning for yourself vs having a studio campaign for you. It’s all the same thing.
— 🌹🚀 (@blackoutalbum) January 28, 2023
I totally agree with her. I think it’s very unfortunate that two black actresses with more precursor support were left out of the lineup but I don’t see why Andrea is to blame for taking a chance on a different approach to campaigning.
— Deedee Megadoodoo (@meryl_strap) January 28, 2023
that’s exactly what I’ve been thinking
— white wendy williams (@poIishdoll) January 28, 2023
\u201cChristina Ricci\u2019s statement on the whole Andrea Riseborough Oscar Nomination \u201ccontroversy\u201d nails it \ud83d\udcaf End of story!\u201d— Cha Cha Gabor (@Cha Cha Gabor) 1674931480
I agree with her. How elitist to allow only women who have big money studios back them and not a grass roots campaign. If they take it away… it’ll be vile and evil
— Timmy Shimmy (@bossman8521) January 28, 2023
Many, however, stand with the Academy amidst allegations that Riseborough's social media praise from Hollywood icons may have developed far from organically.
According to Matthew Belloni, actor Mary McCormack, who is also the wife of To Leslie's director, personally reached out to celebrities asking them to watch the film and publicly share their positive reviews.
And many expressed their anger that two actors of color whom many considered deserving of a nomination–Viola Davis and Danielle Deadwyler–were overlooked in favor of Riseborough.
this has exposed a reality, influential actors favoring a colleague. Andrea's professionalism is not questioned, but rather the shameless way to influence his nomination. If that's not corruption, i don't know what is. That leaves a big question mark over the nomination process
— Alex Mendives (@nvidiashield_) January 28, 2023
\u201cthe way Andrea Riseborough can just start campaigning in January with all her powerful friends and still get a nomination. while incredible performances by Viola Davis and Danielle Deadwyler were snubbed... rich white women really have it so easy\u201d— #StreamHateMyHeart \ud83d\udc94 (@#StreamHateMyHeart \ud83d\udc94) 1674583115
I don’t see how Viola Davis and Danielle Deadwyler getting snubbed qualifies as a pushback against elitism and exclusion. It’s the opposite of that, actually.
— Lisa Bee (@leebee4life) January 28, 2023
If she's allowed to keep it, also shame on them.
— June Cleaver 2.0🐘🐘 (@JuneCleaver20) January 28, 2023
Ricci is clueless. It's the fact that CAA threw money behind her and these elitist A-listers mounted a campaign for her and at the last minute VOILA...she was nominated. I'm not an Academy lover by any stretch, but something smells here. It says Academy votes can be bought.
— Sydney Chandler (@syds180turn) January 30, 2023
@TheatreofZen/Twitter
\u201cYep. I had a feeling that the groundswell for Andrea Riseborough would kick out Deadwyler and Viola Davis. \n\nWhich isn\u2019t an anti-Risenorough tweet. But Black women quite literally never get that campaign. And are always harmed.\u201d— Robert Daniels (@Robert Daniels) 1674569626
Without naming Riseborough directly, the Academy made a statement regarding the investigation.
"We are committed to ensuring an inclusive awards process."
"We are conducting a review of the campaign procedures around this year's nominees, to ensure that no guidelines were violated, and to inform us whether changes to the guidelines may be needed in a new era of social media and digital communication."
"We have confidence in the integrity of our nomination and voting procedures, and support genuine grassroots campaigns for outstanding performances."
\u201cThe Academy has issued a statement saying they \u201care conducting a\u00a0review of the campaign procedures around this year\u2019s [Oscar] nominees, to ensure that no guidelines were violated, and to inform us whether changes to the guidelines may be needed in a new era of social media.\u201d\u201d— Film Updates (@Film Updates) 1674859367
The Academy's board of governors is set to meet this week to address the controversy.