Which one was your favorite? via Did You Know


After calling on billionaires in general to donate their money, musician Billie Eilish has now set her sights on the richest billionaire of them all: the soon-to-be trillionaire Elon Musk.
And she did not mince words.
In an Instagram story, Eilish shared an infographic explaining all of the worldwide problems Musk could solve in one fell swoop and still come out a billionaire.
And she capped it off with an insult for the ages.

In the Stories she posted, Eilish pointed out what Musk could actually do with his potential upcoming trillion-dollar payday.
For instance, she posted a statistic claiming Musk could solve world hunger by 2030 if he donated $40 billion a year.
For reference, a trillion is one thousand billions. That expenditure of $200 billion would still leave him with $800 billion.
Or, as Eilish next pointed out, Musk could spend $1-$2 billion a year to save endangered species. He could do that for the rest of his life and still have hundreds of billions of dollars.
Or, for just a single payout of $70 billion, he could rebuild Gaza, and likely still die a trillionaire.
But Musk won't, of course, and in her Story Eilish explained why. It's because he is, in her words:
"fu*king pathetic pu*sy b*tch coward."
Whether she's right about that is subjective, of course, but she is almost certainly right that Musk won't bother to do anything beneficial with his money, because he has a track record on this issue.
In 2022, Musk quite infamously tweeted at the UN that he would donate $6 billion if they could prove it would solve world hunger.
When the UN issued a report just that three days later explaining how that $6 billion could provide an entire year's worth of food for the 42 million people most in danger of starvation worldwide, Musk of course reneged.
Instead, he donated the $6 billion to his own foundation, which, like most non-profits run by billionaires, appears to be nothing but an elaborate tax-dodge.
So "fu*king pathetic pu*sy b*tch coward," one could argue, definitely fits.
On social media, many people applauded Eilish for speaking plainly about Musk.
Of course, this being the golden era of a total lack of critical thinking, many also criticized Eilish for not doing enough herself.
But given that Eilish just weeks ago donated $11.5 million of her estimated $50 million net worth, the criticism doesn't really stand on its face, let alone in comparison to Musk.
That donation came after Eilish called out a whole roomful of billionaires that included Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates for being billionaires in the first place and not donating their money.
She then pledged $11.5 million of her tour proceeds to world hunger and climate change causes.
California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom focused his trolling of the administration of MAGA Republican President Donald Trump on Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, creating a fake dog obedience school ad for the self-professed puppy killer.
In her 2024 memoir, No Going Back: The Truth on What's Wrong with Politics and How We Move America Forward, Noem bragged about shooting and killing her 14-month-old Wire-haired Pointer puppy named Cricket after she failed to train it properly and without trying to rehome the dog to a competent trainer or a hunting dog rescue.
Noem claimed killing the puppy, and a goat she went home to get after shooting Cricket, proved her hard decision making capabilities. People—especially farmers, ranchers, and hunters—disagreed, saying Noem's actions proved her inability to weigh options and make the best choice, instead of lashing out in the fit of rage she described having in her book.
Since Noem made her puppy killing proclivity public, she's been repeatedly ridiculed and mocked for it, famously and hilariously by South Park.
Now Newsom's social media team, who have previously targeted Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Trump propaganda minister and puppeteer Stephen Miller, is using Noem's boast about killing a puppy to troll the controversial Trump cabinet member. Newsom's office previously dubbed Noem “Kosplay Kristi” over her frequent costumed photo ops.
On November 13, the Governor Newsom Press Office account posted a photo on X, captioned:
"Sign up today!"
The photo said:
"KRISTI NOEM’S DOG OBEDIENCE SCHOOL: She’ll Treat Them As Good As She Treats Brown People."
Noem used the official Department of Homeland Security account to lash out in response to the mockery.
A triggered Department of Homeland Security lashed out at Gavin Newsom after the California governor roasted Kristi Noem over her puppy-killing.
[image or embed]
— The Daily Beast (@thedailybeast.bsky.social) November 13, 2025 at 9:55 PM
Some people took exception to making a joke about Noem's animal cruelty.
But Newsom's office responded:
"dude, she’s a self-admitted puppy killer"
Others acknowledged Noem bragged about her animal cruelty.
just had to explain kristi noem dog thing and kid was like O_o “I SURE DO LOVE LIVING IN AMERICA.”
— maggie schreiter (pie wanter) (@squishythings.com) November 14, 2025 at 6:04 PM
and then Kristi Noem shot the dog
— Havenlore Cancer Fighter (@havenlore.bsky.social) November 13, 2025 at 1:05 PM
That look of betrayal..."Dad. I don't like this show" ~Doggo That dog is too young to be watching Hassan livestream.'Kristi Noem has entered the chat.' Kristi Noem is like a box of chocolates. All the good stuff was picked out ages ago & she absolutely will kill your dog.
[image or embed]
— murderedbybluesky.bsky.social (@murderedbybluesky.bsky.social) November 14, 2025 at 1:40 PM

If Donnie's the "dog that didn't bark" maybe we should introduce him to Noem as "untrainable"??And tell her he looks like a goat, too
— Just Dave (@dvcop.bsky.social) November 12, 2025 at 1:19 PM
In addition to her animal cruelty, Noem is also drawing criticism for her racially biased abductions of United States citizens, documented immigrants, and undocumented immigrants and for her extravagant lifestyle at taxpayers' expense, earning her the nickname "ICE Barbie."
President Donald Trump was called out for hypocrisy after he said during the signing of an executive order expanding resources for the foster care system that the Bible instructs society to care for "vulnerable children and orphans"—only for people to point out that he had denied Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to hungry children just days before.
The loss of SNAP is a result of the Trump administration's failure to spend contingency funds to feed people on the program, a decision that is resulting in a nationwide hunger crisis impacting millions of families.
Although SNAP benefits are administered by individual states, the program is funded by the federal government, which was shuttered until the government shutdown was finally resolved last week; the budget impasse kicked off after the GOP refused to negotiate with Democrats over Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies that were due to expire.
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration, granting its emergency request to temporarily halt a lower court order that required full funding of SNAP food assistance during the shutdown even as some states had already begun issuing the payments.
A federal judge had given the administration until Friday to deliver the full allotments through SNAP. But the White House appealed, asking that courts allow it to avoid spending beyond what remains in a limited contingency fund and to proceed instead with only partial SNAP disbursements for the month.
Despite all of these well-documented facts, Trump said:
"The Bible tells us that one of the measures of any society is how it cares for vulnerable children and orphans—so important and so big in the Bible. As we make America great again, we are going to protect American children in foster care."
You can hear what he said in the video below.
Trump's executive order, titled "Fostering the Future for American Children and Family," brings together federal agencies and public- and private-sector partners to expand opportunities for young people in, and aging out of, the foster care system.
It directs Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to modernize state child-welfare data systems and publish an annual scorecard evaluating how state foster care programs are performing.
Working with the Office of the First Lady, Kennedy must also launch a new “Fostering the Future” initiative. The program will partner with major companies, universities, and nonprofit organizations to create pathways to education and employment for current and former foster youth.
The initiative is additionally tasked with building an online platform to help foster youth locate local resources, expanding access to Education and Training Vouchers, and broadening educational opportunities overall.
All of that sounds nice on paper—but rings hollow in light of the facts.
Trump was harshly criticized.
Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said during a Thursday interview with Newsmax that the Trump administration will require millions of recipients to reapply for the SNAP benefits they were denied as part of an effort to crack down on “fraud."
Rollins said she plans to “have everyone reapply for their benefits, make sure that everyone that’s taking a taxpayer-funded benefit through ... food stamps, that they literally are vulnerable and they can’t survive without it.”
SNAP fraud can occur when participants intentionally misrepresent their eligibility, when retailers illegally exchange benefits for cash, or when criminals steal benefits by skimming EBT cards, according to USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service.
However, anti-hunger advocates say the problem is far smaller than the Trump administration suggests, noting that the average participant receives only about $6 a day in SNAP benefits.
President Donald Trump has been married three times, but his hypocrisy escaped him entirely when he attacked Kentucky Republican Representative Thomas Massie for getting remarried last month following the death of his first wife in 2024—prompting his own party to call him out for going too far.
Last week, Massie announced he'd married his wife, Carolyn Grace Moffa, in late October. His first wife and "high school sweetheart," Rhonda Howard Massie, died in June 2024.
Massie took to social media and wrote:
"Carolyn and I would like to announce our recent marriage! We were legally married in Kentucky on October 19th by the pastor of the church we have been attending for several months. This weekend we celebrated with close friends and family at a Christian wedding ceremony in Pennsylvania where Carolyn is from."
"Carolyn Grace Moffa and I first met professionally over a decade ago when she worked for Senator Rand Paul. As Senator Paul’s Ag policy staffer until 2016, Carolyn was a very early proponent and practitioner of Making America Healthy Again. She even visited me and my late wife Rhonda on our grass-fed cattle farm several years ago. Carolyn has not previously been married."
"I have four adult children, who are all married to wonderful people, and three grandchildren from my blessed 31 year marriage to Rhonda who I still miss every day. We will reside on the farm in Kentucky where Carolyn recently helped me re-establish ducks and chickens to go with the beef cattle. We plan to travel back-and-forth to DC and throughout Kentucky as my congressional responsibilities require."
"Fun facts about our wedding: Of course we served raw milk with the wedding cake and margaritas made with frozen peaches from our farm! Senator Rand Paul and Representatives Jim Jordan, Warren Davidson, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Victoria Spartz attended, however the real VIPs were my three grandkids. My oldest grandson was the ring bearer."
"I proposed to Carolyn on the steps of the Library of Congress which was the location of our first date. Please pray for us as Carolyn steps into the arena with me. With her support, I look forward to continuing my fight for freedom for the great people of Kentucky!
You can see his post below.
Shortly afterward, Trump posted the following message on Truth Social:
“Did Thomas Massie, sometimes referred to as Rand Paul Jr., because of the fact that he always votes against the Republican Party, get married already??? Boy, that was quick!”
"No wonder the Polls have him at less than an 8% chance of winning the Election. Anyway, have a great life Thomas and (?). His wife will soon find out that she's stuck with a LOSER!"
You can see Trump's post below.

Trump's post came after he and Massie spent recent days trading barbs over documents tied to the late financier, pedophile, and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. Trump blasted “stupid” Republicans for backing a petition that would force a vote on making the files public.
Notably, Massie sponsored a House discharge petition that would force the release of the Epstein files—so Trump, whose administration has declined to release the files despite promising to for months, has plenty of reason to be angry at Massie.
But there was no doubt Trump's behavior was petty and nasty.
He was swiftly called out by his own party.
In an interview on ABC, Massie said his wife joked that Trump is "mad he didn't get an invitation" to their recent wedding, saying Trump is "being a bully or trying to be a bully."
He added:
"They're trying to beat me here in Kentucky. The people financing this campaign consist of three billionaires and they're all in the Epstein class. In fact, one of them is named in Epstein's phone book. Not the secret files the FBI is keeping but in Epstein's phone book."
"It's a small world. Dogs don't bark at parked cars."
This week, Trump said he will ask Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate Epstein’s ties to other prominent figures, including some of his own political opponents.
Massie cautioned that the Justice Department's investigation of Epstein's ties to Democrats could interfere with Congress’ effort to mandate the full release of the files. He noted that “if they have ongoing investigations in certain areas, those documents can’t be released.”
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth was widely mocked after the Department of Defense—or shall we say the self-proclaimed "Department of War"—debuted its new plaque by publishing a video showing Hegseth tightening the screws on the new plaque with the words "Department of War" at the Defense Department's River Entrance.
The Pentagon’s rapid response account shared the clip on X along with the following caption:
"Welcome to the War Department."
You can see the video below.
Despite what Hegseth and his associates might claim, news outlets previously reported that the "Department of War" rebrand is merely a "secondary title" for the Department of Defense and not a legal name change.
The department is only being given alternate labels, which is a symbolic rebrand more than anything substantive. The official name will remain the same unless Congress passes a law to change it.
Performative, huh?
Hegseth was mocked in response.
Inside the Pentagon, the rebrand has sparked frustration and bewilderment, with many officials criticizing it as an expensive cosmetic shift that would potentially cost billions and that does little to address urgent issues like confronting the growing strength of authoritarian powers.
The White House even said in an official release that President Donald Trump's order "authorizes the Secretary of Defense, the Department of Defense and subordinate officials to use secondary titles such as 'Secretary of War,' 'Department of War,' and 'Deputy Secretary of War' in official correspondence, public communications, ceremonial contexts, and non-statutory documents within the executive branch."
Hegseth has said the name change is important because the country has lost its "warrior ethos" and that the country's founders "wanted an empowered military—the handcuffs were taken off—to fight to win, and then bring those troops home."
He went further, claiming the founders "didn't want endless foreign entanglements" and "didn't want endless contingencies and deployments."