Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

The President's Twitter Threat to Bomb Syria Is Trumpian Hypocrisy at Its Finest

The President's Twitter Threat to Bomb Syria Is Trumpian Hypocrisy at Its Finest
Chris Kleponis-Pool/Getty Images

As usual, we have the receipts.

President Donald Trump's tweets about President Obama's handling of ISIS and Syria are coming back to haunt him.


As Trump mulls his options over how to respond to Saturday's chemical weapon attack in Ghouta, Syria, his proposed threats of missile strikes are exactly what he said Obama shouldn't do. In a single tweet early Wednesday morning, Trump threatened to hit Syria with "nice and new and 'Smart!!'" missiles while simultaneously goading Russia, who threatened to shoot down any American missiles and hit back at their points of origin.

On Saturday, more than 40 people were killed and hundreds more injured when poison gas was released in Ghouta, a suburb east of Damascus. Syrian officials have denied involvement in the attack, and have invited the United Nation's investigative team to look into the incident. Iran and Russia, both of whom are allies of the war-torn country, called allegations of Syrian involvement "ridiculous."

"Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria. Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and "smart!" You shouldn't be partners with a Gas Killing Animal who kills his people and enjoys it!"

The president's provocative language aside, announcing his potential military response is a direct contradiction to what he accused Obama of doing in 2014. Trump said that when a "country tells the enemy" what they intend to do, the "element of surprise" disappears. In this case, "the enemy" to which Trump was referring was ISIS.

"What other country tells the enemy when we are going to attack like Obama is doing with ISIS. Whatever happened to the element of surprise?"

Twenty days later, Trump reiterated his stance, asking why Obama won't "just be quiet" about how he planned on handling Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad's use of chemical weapons against his people. In 2013, Obama said the use of chemical weapons was a "red line."

"Why do we keep broadcasting when we are going to attack Syria. Why can't we just be quiet and, if we attack at all, catch them by surprise?"

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump refused to share his strategy for defeating ISIS, claiming that he didn't want his ideas to fall into the hands of enemies of the U.S. or his political opponents. He shared similar sentiment about his plans for dealing with North Korea. "I don't want to be one of these guys that say, yes, here's what we're going to do. I don't have to do that. I don't have to tell you what I'm going to do in North Korea," Trump told a reporter last year.

Russian and Syrian armed forces have begun mobilizing in the event of a U.S. attack, which carries the risk of escalating into all out war with Russia.

Twitter was quick to pounce on Trump's hypocrisy, which is now bordering on recklessness as his personal legal battles continue to mount.






More from People/donald-trump

dog and cat snuggling together
Krista Mangulsone on Unsplash

Times Pet Owners 'Severely Underestimated' Their Pets' Intelligence

I've lived with cats—because no one owns a feline—most of my life. Some have been very clever creatures while others were real dingbats.

Family members have owned dogs whose talents also ran the gamut.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scott Bessent
Meet the Press/NBC News

Scott Bessent Blasted Over His Bonkers Suggestion For How To Bring Your Own Inflation Rate Down

Continuing to follow the example of MAGA Republican President Donald Trump, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent appeared on Meet the Press Sunday to blame Democratic President Joe Biden for the financial downturn caused by Trump's tariff fiasco, then lied repeatedly about the state of the economy.

Meet the Press host Kristen Welker played a clip of MAGA Republican Vice President JD Vance telling a conservative audience at a Breitbart News event that Americans owe the Trump administration "a little bit of patience"—apparently while they figure out what tariffs are and how they work since they're rolling back more of them to lower consumer prices despite claiming Trump's tariffs don't affect consumer prices.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lindsay Lohan attends the men's final during day fifteen of the 2025 US Open Tennis Championships at USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center.
Elsa/Getty Images

Lindsay Lohan Is Now Sporting A New Accent—And Fans Aren't Sure What To Make Of It

In a twist freakier than a sequel to Freaky Friday, Lindsay Lohan has debuted yet another new accent—this time at the Fashion Trust Arabia Awards in Doha, Qatar.

Draped in a maroon, jewel-trimmed gown by The New Arrivals Ilkyaz Ozel and accompanied by her husband, Bader Shammas, and their 2-year-old son, Luai, the actress looked serene, elegant, and completely unbothered by the collective whiplash she was about to inflict on the internet.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jameela Jamil
Gilbert Flores/Variety/Getty Images

Jameela Jamil Speaks Out Against The Rise Of The 'Aesthetic Of Emaciation' Among Women In Hollywood

Content Warning: eating disorders, thinness as an aesthetic, emaciation in Hollywood

There's no denying that we've been gifted with some incredible music, television shows, and films this year.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump; Screenshot of Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker in "Rush Hour 2"
Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images; New Line Cinema

Trump Is Now Using His Presidential Sway To Pressure Studio Into Making 'Rush Hour 4'—And, Huh?

President Trump has reportedly pressured Paramount head Larry Ellison to make another sequel to Rush Hour, his favorite buddy-cop movie, as the company looks to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery.

The first Rush Hour film, starring Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker, was released in 1998, received positive reviews, and made $245 million worldwide. Chan and Tucker returned for two sequels released in 2001 and 2007 respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less