Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

The Supreme Court Just Made It A Lot Easier For Companies To Evade Lawsuits By Employees

The Supreme Court Just Made It A Lot Easier For Companies To Evade Lawsuits By Employees
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The United States Supreme Court issued a ruling on Monday that greatly undermines the ability of workers to sue their employers for withholding pay or exercising discriminatory practices.


In a 5-4 ruling along party lines, the Court sided with employers who force employees to sign arbitration waivers, which eliminate the right for workers to mount class action lawsuits against companies for back pay and discriminatory damages. The ruling upholds existing workplace contracts which state that any disputes must be settled by private arbitrators.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, whom President Donald Trump appointed last year, wrote the deciding opinion, in which he said that National Labor Relations Act was not put in place to "displace" federal arbitration law.

"The policy may be debatable but the law is clear: Congress has instructed that arbitration agreements like those before us must be enforced as written."

Gorsuch's controversial appointment to the Supreme Court came after Senate Republicans blocked President Obama's effort in 2016 to nominate Merrick Garland after the unexpected death of conservative Justice Antonin Scalia. Republicans claimed that because it was an election year, any SCOTUS pick should be put on hold until after the American people had made their choice for president.

Workers challenged employers' enforcement of strict arbitration clauses in employment contracts, arguing before the Supreme Court that the NLRA guarantees workers "mutual aid and protection" in confronting employers over workplace abuses.

Liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, blasting the majority ruling as "egregiously wrong." Ginsburg argued that the NLRA exists to protect the rights of workers to collectively pursue litigation, which is enormously more difficult and financially burdensome for those who are forced to go it alone.

"Employees' rights to band together to meet their employers' superior strength would be worth precious little if employers could condition employment on workers signing away those rights."

When the case, National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc., was brought before SCOTUS last year, Ginsburg said, "there is strength in numbers," and that it's the Court's duty to "protect the individual worker from being in a situation where he can't protect his rights."

Sheila Hobson, a former Murphy Oil employee, sued the company over overtime work that she claimed herself and coworkers were forced to perform without compensation. After they banded together to launch a class action suit against Murphy Oil, their lawyer informed them that they had rescinded their right to sue when they signed their employment contracts, which included arbitration waivers.

Both The National Labor Relations Board and the Obama administration supported the plaintiffs' claims. The Obama White House even submitted a brief to the Supreme Court, urging the justices to side with workers. Officials within the Trump administration, however, sided with employers, in (as what would be considered then) a rare demonstration of policy reversal from a previous administration.

Last year, the Economic Policy Institute issued a report in which it stated that upwards of 25 million workers in the United States sign away their right to take their employer to court for withholding pay and other discriminatory practices. The EPI's report expressed concern that arbitration waivers would be "even more widespread practice" if the Supreme Court were to side against the collective bargaining power of laborers.

"Class-action lawsuits are often the most powerful way for employees to secure back pay when their minimum wage or overtime rights have been violated or to secure damages when their bosses run afoul of discrimination laws."

Employees now have little recourse in combating wage theft and instances of sexual harassment in the workplace. With the Court's ruling in place, American workers can likely expect abusive practices by employers to not only become more common, but that such misdoings will continue to go unchecked.

More from News

Pedro Pascal; JK Rowling
Toya Sarno Jordan/Getty Images for Disney; Dave J Hogan/Getty Images

Pedro Pascal Opens Up About Why He Called Transphobe JK Rowling A 'Heinous Loser'

Actor Pedro Pascal recently explained why he said Harry Potter author and anti-trans activist JK Rowling behaves like a "heinous loser," and suffice it to say he has absolutely no regrets.

The comment came in reference to Rowling gloating over the U.K. Supreme Court's recent decision to define what exactly constitutes a "woman" in the eyes of U.K. law, a decision that subjects trans people to violence, among other problems.

Keep ReadingShow less
JD Vance
Johannes Simon/Getty Images

Vance Dragged After Making Cringey Middle Finger Joke About 'Pink-Haired People' At GOP Dinner

Vice President JD Vance was criticized profusely after he attempted to make a joke mocking liberals during his appearance at the Ohio Republican Party dinner this week—only to have people calling out his lack of class for holding up his middle finger as he delivered the punchline.

Vance was in the middle of giving the event's keynote speech when he said the following:

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump
Beata Zawrzel/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Trump Ripped After Posting Disturbing Parody Music Video About His Attack On Iran

President Donald Trump is facing harsh criticism after he shared a music video featuring the 1980 song "Bomb Iran"—a parody of The Regents song "Barbara Ann" that is best known for being covered by the Beach Boys—amid a ceasefire between Israel and Iran that could further inflame tensions in the Middle East.

The controversial parody song by Vince Vance & the Valiants plays over footage of B-2 stealth bombers, the same aircraft used to drop 14 GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs on Iranian nuclear facilities, including the Fordow enrichment plant, Natanz complex, and Isfahan site.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump; Zohran Mamdani
Omar Havana/Getty Images; Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

Trump Just Tried To Slam Zohran Mamdani's Looks And Voice—And It Was Projection At Its Finest

President Donald Trump lashed out at Zohran Mamdani after the 33-year-old democratic socialist handily defeated former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary on Tuesday—only to be called out for projecting his own feelings of inadequacy onto the star candidate.

Mamdani ran a campaign centered around economic populism, arguing that the city, a global financial center, has grown unaffordable for everyday residents, citing soaring rents and grocery prices, and outlining policies aimed at reducing the cost of living.

Keep ReadingShow less
salad
Anna Pelzer on Unsplash

Doctors Explain Which Seemingly 'Healthy' Foods Aren't All That Good For Us

Every day it seems like some new health fad pops up.

Eat this, don't eat that.

Keep ReadingShow less