Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Bernie Sanders Unloads On Starbucks CEO For 'Union Busting' In Epic Takedown During Senate Hearing

C-SPAN 3 screenshot of Bernie Sanders; C-SPAN 3 screenshot of Howard Schultz
C-SPAN 3

Sanders wasted no time during his opening statement of the Senate hearing to call out the coffee chain's CEO Howard Schultz for leading 'the most aggressive and illegal union-busting campaign in the modern history of our country.'

Howard Schultz, the billionaire former CEO and co-founder of Starbucks, was questioned in a Senate hearing on Wednesday about allegations of union-busting by the coffee chain.

The hearing was led by Vermont Independent Senator Bernie Sanders and Senate Democrats, who accused Starbucks of carrying out “the most aggressive and illegal union-busting campaign in the modern history of our country” over the past 18 months.


Schultz, who was present at the hearing, denied the allegations and dismissed recent rulings by administrative law judges that found otherwise. He also pushed back against being called a "billionaire" because he "grew up in federally subsidized housing."

You can hear what Sanders said in the video below.

Sanders said:

"Over the past 18 months, Starbucks has waged the most aggressive and illegal union-busting campaign in the modern history of our country. That union-busting campaign has been led by Howard Schultz, the multibillionaire founder and director of Starbucks, who is with us this morning only under the threat of subpoena."

He then went into more detail about the scale of Starbucks' union-busting efforts:

"Let us be clear about the nature of Starbucks’ vicious anti-union efforts. The National Labor Relations Board, NLRB, has filed over 80 complaints against Starbucks for violating federal labor law. There have been over 500 unfair labor practice charges lodged against the company."
"And judges have found that Starbucks broke the law 130 times across six states since workers began organizing in the fall of 2021. These violations include the illegal firing of more than a dozen Starbucks workers for “the crime” of exercising their right to form a union and to collectively bargain for better wages, benefits and working conditions."

And he noted that Starbucks "has refused to sign a single first contract with the union" since the first Starbucks union was certified over a year ago:

Since the first Starbucks union was certified more than 450 days ago in Buffalo, workers at more than 360 stores across 40 states have held union elections."
"Eighty-three percent of these elections have resulted in a union victory, and today nearly 300 Starbucks coffee shops, employing more than 7,000 workers, have a union — despite Starbucks’ aggressive anti-union efforts."
"Not a single one."

The National Labor Relations Board's general counsel has made numerous claims against Starbucks, accusing the company of violating labor laws over the past year and a half. These complaints include allegations of illegal employee firings, withholding of wages and benefits, store closures, and offering incentives to discourage workers from organizing.

Schultz was specifically implicated in charges of unfair labor practices, with accusations that he promised to improve pay and benefits if employees chose not to unionize.

Schultz was questioned regarding whether he had threatened or coerced workers to discourage them from unionizing. His response was cautious, stating that he had engaged in conversations that could have been misinterpreted.

At one point, Pennsylvania Democratic Senator Bob Casey claimed that Starbucks had spent significant funds on an anti-union law firm, to which Schultz objected, saying that he and Starbucks were not "union busters," resulting in laughter from some in the audience.

Many have criticized Schultz and expressed their support for Starbucks workers.


Baristas and their supporters waited for over an hour outside the hearing room, eager to see Schultz answer questions about how Starbucks had combated a union effort that had organized nearly 300 of the company's 9,000 corporate-owned stores since 2021.

Schultz maintained that Starbucks did not require a union, saying Starbucks doesn't "need" one. However, during the hearing, two witnesses, a current and a former Starbucks employee, disputed Schultz's claim that Starbucks had run a fair campaign.

More from News

Kyra Sedgwick and Kevin Bacon on accoustic guitar
@kevinbacon/TikTok

Kevin Bacon And Kyra Sedgwick Hilariously Admit Secrets To Each Other In Viral 'We Don't Judge' Video

Successful communication between spouses is when one listens first while the other shares a revelation.

Actors Kevin Bacon and Kyra Sedgwick, who've been married since 1988, demonstrated they had this in the bag while participating in the viral TikTok challenge, "We listen and we don't judge."

Keep ReadingShow less
Blue Ivy Carter
Axelle/Bauer-Griffin/FilmMagic/GettyImages

Fans Defend Blue Ivy After People Call Her Dress At 'Mufasa' Premiere 'Wildly Inappropriate'

Beyoncé and Jay-Z's 12-year-old daughter Blue Ivy drew backlash at the Mufasa premiere because she was attired in a "wildly inappropriate" dress for a pre-teen. But, fans quickly came to the young actor's defense.

In Mufasa, the sequel and prequel to the live-action 2019 remake of The Lion King, Ivy voiced Kiara, the granddaughter of Mufasa and daughter of Simba and Nala.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kyrsten Sinema; Joe Manchin
Mandel Ngan-Pool/Getty Images; Samuel Corum/Getty Images

Kyrsten Sinema And Joe Manchin Give Dems And Labor Unions The Middle Finger With Vote

Outgoing Independent senators Kyrsten Sinema (Arizona) and Joe Manchin (West Virginia) gave Democrats and labor unions the middle finger by siding with Republicans to oppose confirming President Joe Biden's renomination of Lauren McFerran for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which will let President-elect Donald Trump seize control of the board next year.

NLRB is the federal agency responsible for safeguarding employees’ workplace rights. Sinema and Manchin's decisive “no” votes doomed the nomination, as all Senate Republicans also opposed it. Only one of their votes was needed to secure McFerran’s confirmation.

Keep ReadingShow less
Vivek Ramaswamy
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Vivek Dragged After Claiming Federal Worker Told Him She'd Be Fine Being Fired

Billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy—fresh off being named the co-head of the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—was dragged after claiming on X that a federal worker came up to him praising DOGE and told him she'd be "OK" with being fired.

Ramaswamy claimed:

Keep ReadingShow less
United States of America flag in window behind wooden pane
Max Sulik on Unsplash

Culture Shocks Americans Faced Moving Home From Abroad

Culture shock is defined as "the feeling of disorientation experienced by someone who is suddenly subjected to an unfamiliar culture, way of life, or set of attitudes."

But what if the culture is the one you were born and raised in?

Keep ReadingShow less