Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

This New Agreement Between 23andMe and GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Is Causing Major Concern Among Privacy Advocates

This New Agreement Between 23andMe and GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Is Causing Major Concern Among Privacy Advocates

The future that TED Talks have long promised is one step closer to reality.

The future that TED Talkshavelongpromised is one step closer to reality, thanks to a new deal between pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and home DNA-testing kit service 23andMe.

The four-year agreement will grant GSK exclusive access to 23andMe’s database of genetic information, with the goal of developing new, targeted drugs and therapies. This isn’t the first time that 23andMe has offered its customers’ data to another organization for research, but those partnerships have previously been transparent. What does this new deal mean for genetic privacy and who will benefit from the partnership?


To privacy advocates,there’s little more alarming than the sale of genetic information. The data could be used by insurance companies to identify certain genetic markers as high-risk, leading to increased premiumseven decades after the test is performed. Law enforcement could subpoena the data from 23andMe (or any other genetic testing company) without informing the customers and without their consent. Thelaw surrounding questions of genetic privacy and ownership are in their infancy. And no genetic testing company canensure that your genetic information remains private.

But in this case, the most serious issue seems to be profit. 23andMe’s estimated 5 million customers can choose to opt out of having their DNA used in research. Those who don’t opt out have essentially donated their genome to science. But that munificence is one-sided: whatever drugs or treatments are developed using the customers’ genetic information will be sold by GSK or 23andMe for profit.

And there’s certainly profit to be made. Separate from this deal, GSK has invested $300 million in 23andMe. It’s a relative bargain for GSK, because 23andMe’s database is up to 10 times larger than other available databases, and its customers have already paid for partial sequencing — typically a major expense.

For its part, GSK is confident that the partnership will produce effective treatments, which will benefit patients across the world. To begin, they’re focusing on treatments for Parkinson’s disease based on a gene called LRRK2 that is mutated in some Parkinson’s patients.

“When you get a genetically validated target and you pursue it, it’s twice as likely to end up being a medicine,” said GSK chief science officer Hal Barron.

Previously, 23andMe had been carrying out some genetic research itself, in partnership with the National Institutes of Health (NIH)  and University of California, Los Angeles and University of Southern California.In those cases, customers could see a clear benefit in allowing research to be carried out on their genome. Just by allowing the company to use the material that the customer had already given, they felt like part of a larger solution.

“It’s one thing for NIH to ask people to donate their genome sequences for the higher good,” Peter Pitts, president of the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest, told NBC News. “But when two for-profit companies enter into an agreement where the jewel in the crown is your gene sequence and you are actually paying for the privilege of participating, I think that’s upside-down.”

More from News

Piers Morgan; Ye
Piers Morgan Uncensored/YouTube

Piers Morgan Rips Ye For Storming Out Of Interview Over Misstated Number Of X Followers

On Monday, British media personality Piers Morgan posted a 17-minute video of a remote interview he did with rapper, producer, and fashion designer Ye and Sneako on his Piers Morgan Uncensored YouTube channel.

It was clear from the title—"'COWARD!' Kanye West/Ye WALKS OUT On Piers Morgan Interview'—that things didn't go well.

Keep ReadingShow less
Harriet Hageman
@Acyn/X

MAGA Rep. Gets Epic Geography Lesson After Making Inane Claim About 'Gulf Of America'

On Monday during a meeting of the House Rules Committee, Wyoming MAGA Republican Representative Harriet Hageman tried to make points with MAGA Republican President Donald Trump by endorsing his executive order to rename the Gulf of Mexico.

She claimed Trump's move was justified because Mexico "has been fouling our waters for decades upon decades." Hageman added the United States needed to "claim ownership of this area."

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of JD Vance and Donald Trump
C-SPAN

Vance Ripped After Making Cringey Joke About Deporting 2026 World Cup Attendees

Vice President JD Vance was soundly criticized after he made a deportation joke while remarking how the 2026 World Cup will see visitors "from close to 100 countries" enter the U.S.

The moment occurred during an announcement naming Andrew Giuliani—son of former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani—as the head of a new task force for the 2026 World Cup, which is set to be hosted jointly by the United States, Canada, and Mexico next year.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Stephen Miller
Fox News

Trump Adviser's Chess Analogy After Trump's Meeting With Canadian Prime Minister Is Epic Self-Own

President Donald Trump's adviser Stephen Miller was mocked online after he used a chess reference to heap praise onto Trump after his Oval office meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.

Canadian voters returned the Liberal Party to power for a fourth consecutive term after Trump repeatedly threatened Canadian sovereignty amid an ongoing trade war. Carney made defending Canada’s sovereignty a cornerstone of his campaign, pushing back forcefully against Trump’s threats to annex the country as “the 51st state.”

Keep ReadingShow less
older couple walking on path
micheile henderson on Unsplash

People In Long-Term Relationships Explain What Love Feels Like To Them Now

While some people wax nostalgic about the "good old days" when everyone stayed married, the reality is that there were almost no options for divorced women. There were very few for widows either.

Longevity in relationships was more about necessity and no other choices than devotion. Now that divorce is easily accessible, longterm relationships are more likely to be a choice.

Reddit user wildpickledradish asked:

Keep ReadingShow less