Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

John Oliver Just Offered Clarence Thomas A Great Deal To 'Get The F**k Off' The Supreme Court

Screenshot of John Oliver; Clarence Thomas
HBO; Alex Wong/Getty Images

The late night host is going viral after offering Clarence Thomas $1 million a year along with a luxury mobile home if he'll leave the Supreme Court.

Last Week Tonight host John Oliver made a bold and unconventional offer to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, saying he would personally provide Thomas with a million dollars a year, along with a $2.4 million motor coach, if he agrees to resign from the Supreme Court immediately.

Oliver's offer, made on his program, is valid for the next 30 days.


Oliver clarified that the offer is not a joke and emphasized its sincerity. He urged Justice Thomas to consider the proposition, stating:

“Lot on your plate right now. From stripping away women’s rights, to hearing Jan. 6 cases you definitely shouldn’t be hearing, to potentially helping rollback decades of federal regulations."
"So that's the offer. A million dollars a year and a brand new condo on wheels, and all you have to do in return is sign the contract and get the f**k off the Supreme Court."

The comedian's offer is not made without context, saying he spoke to legal experts who told him his offer is "somehow legal" and "there are no rules in place" to stop him from offering Thomas a financial incentive to leave the Supreme Court:

"Let me be clear. HBO is not putting up the money for this. I am personally on the hook. You can make me really regret this. I could be doing standup tours to pay for your retirement for years."

You can hear what Oliver said in the video below.

Oliver's offer sparked significant online commentary.



Associate Justices on the Supreme Court earn an annual salary of $298,500 and hold lifetime appointments, and Oliver's unique proposal aims to address Thomas's reported dissatisfaction with the job.

Oliver referenced Thomas's past statement in 2001, where he mentioned that being a Supreme Court Justice was "not worth doing for what they pay."

Last year, a bombshell report published by ProPublica revealed Thomas has been accepting luxury trips from GOP megadonor Harlan Crow for more than 20 years without disclosing them, a possible violation of federal law.

According to the report, Thomas has taken these trips every year yet failed to report them, as required by law, raising concerns about potential corruption and lawbreaking. These undisclosed ties to a conservative donor have sparked outrage among influential Democrats and judicial advocates, who are now calling for action.

Thomas has faced previous ethical controversies, including his failure to recuse himself in a case brought by former President Donald Trump to prevent the House Select Committee from accessing White House documents related to the January 6 insurrection.

It is worth noting that Thomas' wife—conservative activist Ginni Thomas— was involved in efforts to overturn the 2020 election with Trump supporters.

Thomas later responded to ProPublica's report by insisting that the "personal hospitality" of his friends was not "reportable." He added that he has personally "always sought to comply with the disclosure guidelines.”

More from Trending

Kate Gosselin
Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images

Kate Gosselin Shares The 'Lasting Effects' Of Having Sextuplets On Her Body—And We Can Only Imagine

TLC programming was a major part of Millennial and Gen-X culture, particularly shows like Teen Mom, Catfish, Jon & Kate Plus 8, and Keeping Up with the Kardashians.

If you were ever curious for a closer glimpse of Kate Gosselin, mother of twins and then sextuplets, and her life, now is your chance!

Keep ReadingShow less
screenshot of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris presidential debate
CNN

Video Of Kamala Warning Trump About Putin's Agenda Goes Viral After Russian Drones Enter Polish Airspace

One year ago, pundits and the press were analyzing the performances of Democratic presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris and former President and MAGA Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in the first and only debate between the pair before the 2024 presidential election.

During that face-off, it was noted that Trump refused to answer if he wanted United States ally Ukraine to win the war Russia began by invading their neighbor.

Keep ReadingShow less
An 87-year-old Gramercy Park man and his wife fought off a pair of watch thieves in a scam gone wrong.
Eyewitness News ABC7NY/YouTube

87-Year-Old Foils Watch Thieves

Who needs another season of Mr. and Mrs. Smith when Gramercy Park’s own Larry Schwartz and Joanna Cuccia are already serving action-comedy gold? At 87, Schwartz casually knocks out 240 reps a day and chases off watch thieves as if it were just another warm-up set.

And Larry Schwartz wasn’t about to let some Rolex-swapping grifter make him the punchline of a TikTok crime wave.

Keep ReadingShow less
Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic
Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images; 20th Century Fox

Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic

If you've ever wondered if legendary Vogue Editor-in-Chief Anna Wintour has ever seen The Devil Wears Prada, the answer is yes, and she's finally shared her opinions on the film.

The movie, based on Lauren Weisberger's novel of the same name, centers around the trials and tribulations a young writer endures under a legendarily icy fashion editor named Miranda Priestley.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Colbert, and crowd giving standing ovation
CBS

Powerful Line From Sotomayor's Scathing Dissent After ICE Ruling Ignites Standing Ovation On 'Colbert'

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor received a standing ovation during her appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert after Colbert read a line from her powerful dissent following the Court's ruling that immigration agents can use racial profiling when conducting arrests.

The case was brought by several individuals detained during ICE raids. A federal district judge initially found the raids unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Keep ReadingShow less