Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

The Puzzle Pieces of Trump's Attempted Coup Are Falling Into Place

The Puzzle Pieces of Trump's Attempted Coup Are Falling Into Place
Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images
Make us preferred on Google

This past week brought to the fore new revelations of legal memos and Department of Justice communications surrounding the Trump White House's efforts to subvert the election, thanks to a waiver of executive privilege by the Biden White House. We now possess a clearer roadmap to how an inside group of plotters planned to seize power despite their candidate losing the election.

The behind-the-scenes maneuvering also sheds important light on some of the very public moves the former administration was making late last year. Back in December 2020, the Trump campaign made efforts to assemble slates of "alternate" electors in several key battleground states.


White House advisor Stephen Miller went on Fox & Friends to announce the move:

"As we speak today, an alternate slate of electors in the contested states is going to vote, and we're going to send those results up to Congress."

Doing so meant their "legal remedies remain open," he claimed, noting that Congress could validate the Trump electors if any of their lawsuits pan out. So-called "alternate slates" popped up in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Nevada and Michigan, where Republicans followed the White House's lead, making or discussing moves to form their own competing slates of pro-Trump electors.

Legal and election experts quickly dismissed these slates, however, with the New York Times declaring them "a theatrical effort with no legal pathway" because "Electoral College slates are tied to the winner of the popular vote in each state, and all five of those states have certified their results in favor of President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr." Other media outlets also quickly fact-checked and disproved the claim that alternate electors could change the outcome.

With hindsight, these quick dismissals betray a naïveté about the true threat. What the Times and other observers didn't grasp was that the legality of the alternate electors was unimportant, at least to the plotters inside the White House. The coup organizers understood that they only needed the appearance of process and the creation of sufficient doubt among the base to forward their plans.

As John Eastman advised in his now infamous memo—the very kind of "legal remedy" to which Stephen Miller likely was referring—Vice President Pence could simply declare that the Electoral Count Act was unconstitutional, that there were multiple slates of electors, and that therefore the votes of seven states were in dispute and could be disregarded. Vice President Pence would get the jump on the Democrats by simply naming Trump president based on the majority of undisputed votes, giving the White House all it needed by way of official imprimatur to stay in power.

We also learned from internal communications that we were also a hair's breadth away from the administration stepping into the election fraud claims with the full power of the Department of Justice. The proposed communication would have advised the Georgia legislature that the Department was investigating "various irregularities" in the 2020 election and had "significant concerns"—with the result that half of America would now have something official on which to hang their doubts. Worse yet, the proposed letter would state that the Department believed the Georgia governor or the Assembly could and should call the legislature into special session "for [t]he limited purpose of considering issues pertaining to the appointment of Presidential Electors." In other words, the White House was seeking a way to make alternate slates a reality using the power of a GOP-controlled state government, backed up by the prestige of the Department of Justice.

Had the plotters been successful in Georgia, the contagion could have quickly spread to GOP-controlled legislatures in Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan, creating the very kind of chaos that would have vindicated the illegal move by Vice President Pence. If the Vice President or the acting Attorney General had been any more compliant, the plot would have lurched forward, and we'd be in electoral chaos, facing an autocoup by the former president.

We also learned just this week that the Trump campaign actually knew that the allegations of election fraud, specifically around Dominion voting machines and that company's supposed connections to Venezuela and George Soros, were completely fabricated. Despite top communications directors of the campaign having vetted and disproven these claims, Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell went before cameras just days later and reiterated the false claims, doubling down on the Big Lie and spawning endless conspiracy theories while raking in donations.

This newest revelation proves what we already believed: This was never about fighting for an election they honestly believed they had won. Rather, it was only ever about doing everything to stay in power, including lying to and fleecing their base. To this day, a majority of Trump voters refuse to accept the fact that the election was not stolen from their candidate.

And so we are not out of the woods. The Trump forces within the GOP are actively working to subvert upcoming elections by placing MAGA cronies in key election-related positions, from county election commissioners to Secretaries of State. In Georgia, for example, a former Congressman and Trump loyalist who voted to subvert the electoral college count is now running for Secretary of State with Trump's backing, hoping to unseat Brad Raffensperger, who insisted after three audits that Georgia's election was free and fair and that Trump had lost. It would not take much by way of "officials" in key states like Georgia casting doubts upon an election to cause whole sets of electors to be suspect or disqualified in 2024. And should the GOP regain control of the House and Senate, a simple majority vote by both chambers would be enough to sustain an objection to those electors, throwing the election to the Republican nominee who might very likely be Donald Trump.

It is therefore no stretch to say that the 2022 midterms are a pivotal moment for our nation and system of governance, which is under serious attack from within. A majority of elected GOP House members have demonstrated a willingness to destroy democratic principles in order to gain or retain power, in much the way the former Confederate Democrats did some 150 years ago.

The people ultimately voted the anti-democratic Confederates out of power. Democrats must do no less than the same today with the GOP.





More from People/donald-trump

Zohran Mamdani
Kyle Mazza/Anadolu via Getty Images

Mamdani Speaks Out After Releasing 9/11 Records That Reveal NYC Officials Knew Air Around Ground Zero Was 'Toxic'

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani spoke out after releasing more than 170,000 pages of undisclosed city records to the public ahead of the 25th anniversary of the September 11 terror attacks that prove city officials knew that the air was "toxic" around Ground Zero during recovery efforts.

Documents reviewed by the New York Times before their release indicate that asbestos concentrations in dust collected throughout the area exceeded hazardous thresholds in the days after the World Trade Center collapsed. Testing also found asbestos and other contaminants in the air and dust at levels considered unsafe.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump
Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

Trump Was Just Spotted With A Bizarre New Brunette Hair Color—And Here Come The Jokes

President Donald Trump was widely mocked after he was recently spotted departing Air Force One sporting what appeared to be a much darker shade of hair color than the blonde that we're used to seeing.

Trump has for years sported his signature combover, and he has previously spoken about having a significant bald spot on his head. However, he denies wearing a wig.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Donald Trump
Fox News

Trump Slammed After Jokingly Lamenting That 9/11 Hero Is 'More Famous' Than He Is In Tone-Deaf Speech

After speaking during the “Steel Across America” event put on by the Tunnel to Towers Foundation, President Donald Trump was criticized for lamenting that one hero of the September 11 terror attacks is "more famous" than him.

Trump was referring to Welles Crowther, an equities trader at Sandler O’Neill & Partners who was working in the South Tower on Sept. 11, 2001. Crowther, who became known for wearing a red bandana, helped evacuate people from the building and is credited with saving at least 18 lives before the tower collapsed.

Keep ReadingShow less
Robert Pattinson (left) responds to Chris Hansen’s (right) criticism of Primetime.
Marilla Sicilia/Archivio Marilla Sicilia/Mondadori Portfolio via Getty Images; Mireya Acierto/FilmMagic

Robert Pattinson Reacts To 'To Catch A Predator' Star Chris Hansen's Criticism Of His Portrayal In New Film

It’s probably not every day Robert Pattinson gets publicly critiqued by Chris Hansen, but here we are. The actor addressed the former To Catch a Predator host’s concerns about Primetime at the Venice International Film Festival, offering a gracious response to the man whose television career helped inspire the film.

At the panel, Pattinson addressed Hansen’s concerns directly:

Keep ReadingShow less
Amanda Hirsch (left) apologized after facing backlash over a Polymarket post tied to the Lindsay Clancy (right) trial.
Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for TIME; Greg Derr / POOL / AFP via Getty Images

Podcaster Apologizes After 'Insensitive' Post About Betting On Lindsay Clancy Trial Sparks Backlash

Amanda Hirsch is walking back a promotional post that encouraged followers to wager on the verdict in the Lindsay Clancy trial. The Not Skinny But Not Fat creator and host found herself in hot water after her partnership with Polymarket drew backlash online.

Clancy, a former labor and delivery nurse from Duxbury, Massachusetts, was charged with killing her three young children in January 2023. Her case has since fueled debate over maternal mental health, the healthcare system, and the legal definition of insanity.

Keep ReadingShow less