Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Pete Buttigieg Expertly Exposes Amy Coney Barrett's Opening Statement For Condoning 'Judicial Activism'

Pete Buttigieg Expertly Exposes Amy Coney Barrett's Opening Statement For Condoning 'Judicial Activism'
Bruce Glikas/WireImage/Getty Images; Patrick Semansky - Pool/Getty Images

One of the Republican Party's most common attacks against the left is to accuse it and the Democratic party of nominating "activist judges" and having an agenda of "packing" the judiciary with far-left radicals should Joe Biden win the presidential election.

But the GOP has a long history of doing exactly what it accuses the left of plotting, and former presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg expertly demonstrated this during a recent appearance on MSNBC. Buttigieg used Coney Barrett's own opening statement from her Supreme Court confirmation hearing to expose her and the Right's designs on "judicial activism."


Buttigieg's comments begin at approximately the 2:14 mark.

Pete Buttigieg Responds To Amy Coney Barrett's Opening Statement | AM Joy | MSNBCyoutu.be

In her opening statement, Coney Barrett quoted her mentor, the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who asserted that it was not the Court's place to facilitate social change or legislation.

"A judge must apply the law as written, not as the judge wishes it were. Sometimes that approach meant reaching results that he did not like. But as he put it in one of his best-known opinions, that is what it means to say we have a government of laws, not of men."

In other words, the Constitution says what it says, and the time in which it was written is immaterial.

Many have interpreted Coney Barrett's citation of Scalia to be a direct reference to Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court case that resulted in the legalization of same-sex marriage in 2015, which, along with Roe v. Wade, many conservatives consider the most egregious examples of so-called "judicial activism" by the left.

But the notion that the Constitution should not be open to interpretation is difficult to justify. Slavery would still be the law of the land in 2020 in that case, to name just one such egregious outcome of Constitutional originalism.

In his comments, Buttigieg astutely made this point using Coney Barrett's and many other Republicans' words against them, and in so doing made plain the judicial activism readily apparent in Barrett Coney's words.
"At the end of the day, rights in this country have been expanded because courts have understood what the true meaning of the letter of the law and the spirit of the constitution is. That is not about time-traveling yourself back to the 18th century and subjecting yourself to the same prejudices and limitations as the people who write these words."
"The constitution is a living document because the English language is a living language. And you need to have some readiness to understand that in order to serve on the court in a way that will actually make life better."

Buttigieg went on to quote one of Conservatives' most beloved Founding Fathers, Thomas Jefferson, who made precisely this point at the time of the Constitution's drafting.

"It was actually Thomas Jefferson himself who said that 'We might as well ask a man to still wear the coat which fitted him when he was a boy as expect future generations to live under' — what he called — 'the regime of their barbarous ancestors.'"
"So even the founders that these kind of deadhand originalists claim fidelity to understood better than their ideological descendants — today's judicial so-called conservatives — the importance of keeping with the times. And we deserve judges and justices who understand that."

On Twitter, many people applauded Buttigieg's words.











This is but the latest viral television appearances in which Buttigieg has clearly underline the hypocrisies apparent in many of the GOP's positions, including appearances on Fox News last week that many believe will succeed in bringing Republican voters to Joe Biden's side in the election.

More from Trending

Donald Trump; Thomas Massie
Robert Schmidt/Getty Images; Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Conservatives Slam Trump After His Attack On GOP Rep's Marriage Is A Low Blow Even For Him

President Donald Trump has been married three times, but his hypocrisy escaped him entirely when he attacked Kentucky Republican Representative Thomas Massie for getting remarried last month following the death of his first wife in 2024—prompting his own party to call him out for going too far.

Last week, Massie announced he'd married his wife, Carolyn Grace Moffa, in late October. His first wife and "high school sweetheart," Rhonda Howard Massie, died in June 2024.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pete Hegseth
Patrick T. Fallon/Getty Images

Video Of Pete Hegseth Screwing 'Department Of War' Sign Onto Building Gets Brutally Mocked

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth was widely mocked after the Department of Defense—or shall we say the self-proclaimed "Department of War"—debuted its new plaque by publishing a video showing Hegseth tightening the screws on the new plaque with the words "Department of War" at the Defense Department's River Entrance.

The Pentagon’s rapid response account shared the clip on X along with the following caption:

Keep ReadingShow less

People Explain The Dumbest Reasons They Had To Call 911

We've all made mistakes from time to time, and some of them have probably been pretty cringy and stupid.

But most of us can take comfort in the fact that we didn't do something so stupid that we had to call 9-1-1 to get us out of trouble.

Keep ReadingShow less
Meghan Trainor
Entertainment Tonight/YouTube

Meghan Trainor Slams Backlash Over Her Weight Loss—And Reveals She 'Didn't Believe' Body-Positive Message In 'All About That Bass'

It may have been “all about that bass” in 2014, but in 2025, it’s apparently all about Meghan Trainor’s weight loss, or so the internet has decided.

Once again, Trainor has been shoved into Hollywood’s worst recurring storyline: unsolicited opinions about a woman’s body.

Keep ReadingShow less
James Van Der Beek
Tommaso Boddi/Getty Images for Prime Video

James Van Der Beek Selling 'Dawson's Creek' Mementos To Pay For Cancer Treatment—And Fans Are Heartbroken

Fortunately or unfortunately, fans of Dawson’s Creek are poised to soon have a chance to own pieces of TV history, as actor James Van Der Beek will be auctioning off items from his time on the hit show in order to pay for cancer treatments.

Proceeds from the items will go directly to Van Der Beek to help cover costs associated with his treatment for stage 3 colorectal cancer. A father of six, he revealed his diagnosis last year.

Keep ReadingShow less